On Dec 25 22:33, Brian Dessent wrote:
> --- du.c.orig 2004-12-25 22:08:55.138687500 -0800
> +++ du.c2004-12-25 22:09:16.966812500 -0800
> @@ -382,7 +382,7 @@ process_file (FTS *fts, FTSENT *ent)
> {
>size = (apparent_size
> ? sb->st_size
> - : ST_NBL
Ross Boulet wrote:
> I do not have POSIXLY_CORRECT set. I tried the -b and -k
> options. The -b option reports correctly, but the -k still
> seems to report half.
>
> $ ls -l a*
> -rw-r--r-- 1 rossboulet None2 Dec 25 17:24 a
> -rw-r--r-- 1 rossboulet None 3740 Dec 25 10:58 aaa
>
> $ du -
> Ross Boulet wrote:
> >
> > I saw some old items in the archives (circa 2001) but
there
> > was not much there about this problem. The most recent
> > version of coreutils seems to have broken du. The
listing
> > below illustrates my point:
>
> If you have POSIXLY_CORRECT set in your environme
Ross Boulet wrote:
>
> I saw some old items in the archives (circa 2001) but there
> was not much there about this problem. The most recent
> version of coreutils seems to have broken du. The listing
> below illustrates my point:
If you have POSIXLY_CORRECT set in your environment then the defa
I saw some old items in the archives (circa 2001) but there
was not much there about this problem. The most recent
version of coreutils seems to have broken du. The listing
below illustrates my point:
$ ls -l a*
-rw-r--r-- 1 rossboulet None2 Dec 25 17:24 a
-rw-r--r-- 1 rossboulet None 3740
5 matches
Mail list logo
