Larry Hall cygwin.com> writes:
> OK, let's start here:
>
> >Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
>
I'll manage to follow it.
> My WAG based on information so far is that your Cygwin installation isn't
> current. You should make sure it is. A good indication that you're ou
Igor Pechtchanski cs.nyu.edu> writes:
>
> On Sat, 30 Jul 2005, Jason FU wrote:
>
> > tsfu Zeus ~
> > $ ps -e
> > PIDPPIDPGID WINPID TTY UIDSTIME COMMAND
> > 396 1 396396? 18 15:10:03 /usr/bin/cygrunsrv
> > 812 1 8128
On Sat, 30 Jul 2005, Jason FU wrote:
> Jason FU hkucs.org> writes:
>
> "net start| less" shows that the cygwin services start.
>
> These Windows services are started:
> [snip all but Cygwin services]
>CYGWIN cygserver
>Cygwin portmap
>CYGWIN sshd
>
> But below shows not:
Huh?
> [EMA
At 03:46 AM 7/30/2005, you wrote:
>Jason FU hkucs.org> writes:
>
>"net start| less" shows that the cygwin services start.
>
>These Windows services are started:
>
> Automatic Updates
> COM+ Event System
> Computer Browser
> Cryptographic Services
> CYGWIN cygserver
> Cygwin portmap
>
Jason FU hkucs.org> writes:
"net start| less" shows that the cygwin services start.
These Windows services are started:
Automatic Updates
COM+ Event System
Computer Browser
Cryptographic Services
CYGWIN cygserver
Cygwin portmap
CYGWIN sshd
DHCP Client
Distributed File
Jason FU hkucs.org> writes:
There are still many differences in the dlls
Files /bin/cygORBit-2-0.dll and /tmp/dll/cygORBit-2-0.dll differ
Files /bin/cygORBit-imodule-2-0.dll and /tmp/dll/cygORBit-imodule-2-0.dll
differ
Files /bin/cygORBitCosNaming-2-0.dll and /tmp/dll/cygORBitCosNaming-2-0
.dll
Jason FU hkucs.org> writes:
I've re-installed all packages but all cygwin services still don't go up. I'm
now checking to see if the DLL is still different.
Jason
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documenta
Igor Pechtchanski cs.nyu.edu> writes:
> Yes, running setup, selecting the "Keep" strategy, then switching to the
> "Up-to-date" view and choosing to reinstall the packages that contain
> corrupt DLLs is probably the best option at the moment.
> Igor
> P.S. You say you used ncftp's "auto" mo
On Sat, 30 Jul 2005, Jason FU wrote:
> Igor Pechtchanski cs.nyu.edu> writes:
>
> > Ugh, I hope that's not true... [Checks] Yep, md5sum defaults to binary
> > (as it should). The OP probably used some weird non-binary-mode way of
> > transferring the files (e.g., FTP in text mode). So the diffe
Igor Pechtchanski cs.nyu.edu> writes:
>
> Ugh, I hope that's not true... [Checks] Yep, md5sum defaults to binary
> (as it should). The OP probably used some weird non-binary-mode way of
> transferring the files (e.g., FTP in text mode). So the different md5sums
> are legit, and are an indicat
Igor Pechtchanski cs.nyu.edu> writes:
>
> On Fri, 29 Jul 2005, Mark Paulus wrote:
> Ugh, I hope that's not true... [Checks] Yep, md5sum defaults to binary
> (as it should). The OP probably used some weird non-binary-mode way of
> transferring the files (e.g., FTP in text mode). So the differ
On Fri, 29 Jul 2005, Mark Paulus wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 16:18:37 + (UTC), Jason FU wrote:
>
> >Dave Korn artimi.com> writes:
> >
> >> Original Message
> >> >From: Jason FU
> >> >Sent: 29 July 2005 16:15
> >>
> >> > I just checked by dll's by "md5sum /bin/*.dll". I really wonder
Original Message
>From: Jason FU
>Sent: 29 July 2005 17:19
> Dave Korn artimi.com> writes:
>
>>
>> Original Message
>>> From: Jason FU
>>> Sent: 29 July 2005 16:15
>>
>>> I just checked by dll's by "md5sum /bin/*.dll". I really wonder why the
>>> MD5's of all files are not the
On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 16:18:37 + (UTC), Jason FU wrote:
>Dave Korn artimi.com> writes:
>
>>
>> Original Message
>> >From: Jason FU
>> >Sent: 29 July 2005 16:15
>>
>> > I just checked by dll's by "md5sum /bin/*.dll". I really wonder why the
>> > MD5's of all files are n
Dave Korn artimi.com> writes:
>
> Original Message
> >From: Jason FU
> >Sent: 29 July 2005 16:15
>
> > I just checked by dll's by "md5sum /bin/*.dll". I really wonder why the
> > MD5's of all files are not the same since they're of the same "ages".
>
> MD5 is the
Original Message
>From: Jason FU
>Sent: 29 July 2005 16:15
> I just checked by dll's by "md5sum /bin/*.dll". I really wonder why the
> MD5's of all files are not the same since they're of the same "ages".
MD5 is the hash of a file, not the timestamp. RTFM!
cheers,
DaveK
--
I just checked by dll's by "md5sum /bin/*.dll". I really wonder why the MD5's of
all files are not the same since they're of the same "ages".
Thanks.
Jason
217d403d20d82abe32c42b9a73407aca */bin/cygGraphicsMagick++-0.dll
5e82782c2b071097406b059e114b0e07 */bin/cygGraphicsMagick-0.dll
8bbb42f0e
17 matches
Mail list logo
