===
- Original Message -
From: "Charles Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Charles Wilson wrote:
>
> > I have already been given a patch to do this, but I am a little
> > concerned about implementation. It makes sense to me, to defer to
the
> > -devel version, but I am concerned about rippl
Charles Wilson wrote:
> I have already been given a patch to do this, but I am a little
> concerned about implementation. It makes sense to me, to defer to the
> -devel version, but I am concerned about ripple effects...
>
> IMO, if you are libtoolizing (autoconf'ing, automake'ing) a new
> d
Eric Blake wrote:
> With the automake, autoconf, and libtool wrapper scripts presently in
> cygwin, the scripts do not gracefully handle --version and --help from
> an empty directory (that is, a directory with no configure.in):
>
> $ cd /tmp
> $ autoconf --version
> autoconf: no input file
> $
With the automake, autoconf, and libtool wrapper scripts presently in
cygwin, the scripts do not gracefully handle --version and --help from
an empty directory (that is, a directory with no configure.in):
$ cd /tmp
$ autoconf --version
autoconf: no input file
$ automake --version
automake: Couldn
4 matches
Mail list logo