Re: Date of first Cygwin release / 25th Anniversary

On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 2:51 PM Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Sep 23 19:53, Kevin Schnitzius via Cygwin wrote: > > On Wednesday, September 23, 2020, 02:33:13 PM EDT, David Eisner via > Cygwin wrote: > > > > > In any case, happy 25th anniversary, Cygwin! Thanks to everybody who > made it and conti

RE: Date of first Cygwin release / 25th Anniversary

> -Original Message- > From: Cygwin On Behalf Of Corinna > Vinschen > Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2020 2:51 PM > To: cygwin@cygwin.com > Subject: Re: Date of first Cygwin release / 25th Anniversary > > On Sep 23 19:53, Kevin Schnitzius via Cygwin wrote: > > On

Re: Date of first Cygwin release / 25th Anniversary

On Sep 23 19:53, Kevin Schnitzius via Cygwin wrote: > On Wednesday, September 23, 2020, 02:33:13 PM EDT, David Eisner via Cygwin > wrote: > > > In any case, happy 25th anniversary, Cygwin! Thanks to everybody who made > > it and continues to make it possible. > I purchased the 1.0 release CD i

Re: Date of first Cygwin release / 25th Anniversary

On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 9:45 AM Brian Inglis wrote: > > > On 2020-09-23 13:16, Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID) [E] via Cygwin wrote: > > On Wednesday, September 23, 2020 2:33 PM, David Eisner wrote: > >> Cygwin started in 1995.[1] Does anybody know the date of the first release? > >> I recognize that

Re: Date of first Cygwin release / 25th Anniversary

On 2020-09-23 13:16, Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID) [E] via Cygwin wrote: > On Wednesday, September 23, 2020 2:33 PM, David Eisner wrote: >> Cygwin started in 1995.[1] Does anybody know the date of the first release? >> I recognize that there may be no definitive answer, depending on how one >> def

Re: Date of first Cygwin release / 25th Anniversary

On Wed, 23 Sep 2020 at 21:17, Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID) [E] via Cygwin wrote: > > > -Original Message- > > From: David Eisner via Cygwin ... > > Cygwin started in 1995. [1] Does anybody know the date of the first > > release? I recognize that there may be no definitive answer, depend

Re: Date of first Cygwin release / 25th Anniversary

On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 3:18 PM Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID) [E] via Cygwin wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: David Eisner via Cygwin > > Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2020 2:33 PM > > To: cygwin@cygwin.com > > Subject: Date of first Cyg

Re: Date of first Cygwin release / 25th Anniversary

On Wednesday, September 23, 2020, 02:33:13 PM EDT, David Eisner via Cygwin wrote: > In any case, happy 25th anniversary, Cygwin! Thanks to everybody who made it > and continues to make it possible. I purchased the 1.0 release CD in 1999: https://imgur.com/2UnLDhk Cygwin has been my developmen

RE: Date of first Cygwin release / 25th Anniversary

> -Original Message- > From: David Eisner via Cygwin > Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2020 2:33 PM > To: cygwin@cygwin.com > Subject: Date of first Cygwin release / 25th Anniversary > > Cygwin started in 1995. [1] Does anybody know the date of the first release

Date of first Cygwin release / 25th Anniversary

Cygwin started in 1995. [1] Does anybody know the date of the first release? I recognize that there may be no definitive answer, depending on how one defines "release." In any case, happy 25th anniversary, Cygwin! Thanks to everybody who made it and continues to make it possible. -David [1] http

Re: assert creates unusable core dump on current stable Cygwin release

On 2019-10-13 10:27, Jon Turney wrote: > On 10/10/2019 23:20, Brian Inglis wrote: >> On 2019-10-10 14:57, Csaba Raduly wrote: >>> On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 9:19 PM Jon Turney  wrote: (and I guess this patch is not acceptable as-is, as it looks like it would break x86) >>> That was my reacti

Re: assert creates unusable core dump on current stable Cygwin release

On 10/10/2019 23:20, Brian Inglis wrote: On 2019-10-10 14:57, Csaba Raduly wrote: On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 9:19 PM Jon Turney wrote: (and I guess this patch is not acceptable as-is, as it looks like it would break x86) That was my reaction too. Obviously there would have to be some arch depe

Re: assert creates unusable core dump on current stable Cygwin release

On 2019-10-10 14:57, Csaba Raduly wrote: > On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 9:19 PM Jon Turney wrote: >> (and I guess this patch is not acceptable as-is, as it looks like it >> would break x86) > That was my reaction too. Obviously there would have to be some arch dependent conditional changes, but I was

Re: assert creates unusable core dump on current stable Cygwin release

On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 9:19 PM Jon Turney wrote: > (and I guess this patch is not acceptable as-is, as it looks like it > would break x86) That was my reaction too. Csaba -- You can get very substantial performance improvements by not doing the right thing. - Scott Meyers, An Effective C++11/

Re: assert creates unusable core dump on current stable Cygwin release

On 09/10/2019 22:28, Brian Inglis wrote: On 2019-10-09 11:10, Jon Turney wrote: On 09/10/2019 16:31, Brian Inglis wrote: On 2019-10-09 01:14, Biswapriyo Nath wrote: * mintty version: mintty 3.0.6 (x86_64-pc-cygwin) * cygwin version: 3.1.0-0.6 * code: #include int main() { int x = 1; assert(

Re: assert creates unusable core dump on current stable Cygwin release

On 2019-10-09 11:10, Jon Turney wrote: > On 09/10/2019 16:31, Brian Inglis wrote: >> On 2019-10-09 01:14, Biswapriyo Nath wrote: >>> * mintty version: mintty 3.0.6 (x86_64-pc-cygwin) * cygwin version: >>> 3.1.0-0.6 * code: >>> >>> #include >>> >>> int main() { int x = 1; assert(x == 0); } >>> >

Re: assert creates unusable core dump on current stable Cygwin release

On 09/10/2019 16:31, Brian Inglis wrote: On 2019-10-09 01:14, Biswapriyo Nath wrote: * mintty version: mintty 3.0.6 (x86_64-pc-cygwin) * cygwin version: 3.1.0-0.6 * code: #include int main() { int x = 1; assert(x == 0); } * Expected result: The terminal should show this message which a

Re: assert creates unusable core dump on current stable Cygwin release

On 2019-10-09 01:14, Biswapriyo Nath wrote: > * mintty version: mintty 3.0.6 (x86_64-pc-cygwin) > * cygwin version: 3.1.0-0.6 > * code: > > #include > > int main() { > int x = 1; > assert(x == 0); > } > > * Expected result: The terminal should show this message which appers > in latest stab

Re: Cross build of newlib-cygwin release tag cygwin-2_11_1-release.

On 10/30/2018 5:24 PM, cyg Simple wrote: > > > On 10/30/2018 4:32 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >> On Oct 30 16:01, Earnest Boyd wrote: >>> On 10/30/2018 3:31 PM, cyg Simple wrote: On 10/30/2018 11:03 AM, cyg Simple wrote: > PING... Does no one have an idea? > > On 10/29/2018 12

Re: Cross build of newlib-cygwin release tag cygwin-2_11_1-release.

On 10/30/2018 4:32 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Oct 30 16:01, Earnest Boyd wrote: >> On 10/30/2018 3:31 PM, cyg Simple wrote: >>> On 10/30/2018 11:03 AM, cyg Simple wrote: PING... Does no one have an idea? On 10/29/2018 12:09 PM, cyg Simple wrote: > I'm trying to cross bui

Re: Cross build of newlib-cygwin release tag cygwin-2_11_1-release.

On Oct 30 16:01, Earnest Boyd wrote: > On 10/30/2018 3:31 PM, cyg Simple wrote: > > On 10/30/2018 11:03 AM, cyg Simple wrote: > >> PING... Does no one have an idea? > >> > >> On 10/29/2018 12:09 PM, cyg Simple wrote: > >>> I'm trying to cross build the Cygwin source on a VirtualBox Arch Linux > >>>

Re: Cross build of newlib-cygwin release tag cygwin-2_11_1-release.

On 10/30/2018 3:31 PM, cyg Simple wrote: > On 10/30/2018 11:03 AM, cyg Simple wrote: >> PING... Does no one have an idea? >> >> On 10/29/2018 12:09 PM, cyg Simple wrote: >>> I'm trying to cross build the Cygwin source on a VirtualBox Arch Linux >>> with GCC-7.3.0 and Binutils 2.31. The process I am

Re: Cross build of newlib-cygwin release tag cygwin-2_11_1-release.

On 10/30/2018 11:03 AM, cyg Simple wrote: > PING... Does no one have an idea? > > On 10/29/2018 12:09 PM, cyg Simple wrote: >> I'm trying to cross build the Cygwin source on a VirtualBox Arch Linux >> with GCC-7.3.0 and Binutils 2.31. The process I am using clones the >> master repository and then

Re: Cross build of newlib-cygwin release tag cygwin-2_11_1-release.

PING... Does no one have an idea? On 10/29/2018 12:09 PM, cyg Simple wrote: > I'm trying to cross build the Cygwin source on a VirtualBox Arch Linux > with GCC-7.3.0 and Binutils 2.31. The process I am using clones the > master repository and then does a checkout of the release tag. Here is > the

Cross build of newlib-cygwin release tag cygwin-2_11_1-release.

I'm trying to cross build the Cygwin source on a VirtualBox Arch Linux with GCC-7.3.0 and Binutils 2.31. The process I am using clones the master repository and then does a checkout of the release tag. Here is the configure command from the head of the config.log. ``` $ head /home/cygsimple/src/s

Re: New Cygwin release

On 5/25/2012 1:30 PM, Earnie Boyd wrote: On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Karl M wrote: Hi All... With all of the recent bug fixes, could we have a new release once all the dust settles. WAUWOIDB (What a useless waste of internet data bits). The CRT (Cygwin release team) will DIWTGATI (Do

Re: New Cygwin release

On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Karl M wrote: > > Hi All... > > With all of the recent bug fixes, could we have a new release once all the > dust settles. WAUWOIDB (What a useless waste of internet data bits). The CRT (Cygwin release team) will DIWTGATI (Do it when they g

New Cygwin release

Hi All... With all of the recent bug fixes, could we have a new release once all the dust settles. Thanks, ...Karl -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://c

Re: src/winsup cygwin/release/1.7.10 doc/ChangeLog ...

On Jan 29 18:48, Denis Excoffier wrote: > > On 2012-01-29 10:41, corinna wrote: > > > CVSROOT:/cvs/src > > Module name:src > > Changes by: corinna at sourceware.org 2012-01-29 09:41:06 > > > > Modified files: > > wins

Re: src/winsup cygwin/release/1.7.10 doc/ChangeLog ...

On 2012-01-29 10:41, corinna wrote: > CVSROOT: /cvs/src > Module name: src > Changes by: corinna at sourceware.org 2012-01-29 09:41:06 > > Modified files: > winsup/cygwin/release: 1.7.10 > winsup/doc : ChangeLog new-features.sgml

Re: New Cygwin release

On Mar 9 08:51, Andy Koppe wrote: > On 9 March 2011 02:54, Karl M wrote: > > > >> From: BBuchbinder > >> Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 18:49:29 -0500 > >> Subject: RE: New Cygwin release > >> > >> Karl M sent the following at Tuesday, March 08, 20

Re: New Cygwin release

On 9 March 2011 02:54, Karl M wrote: > >> From: BBuchbinder >> Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 18:49:29 -0500 >> Subject: RE: New Cygwin release >> >> Karl M sent the following at Tuesday, March 08, 2011 4:57 PM >> >Is another Cygwin release planned for after the c

Re: New Cygwin release

On 2011-03-09 03:54, Karl M wrote: From: BBuchbinder Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 18:49:29 -0500 Subject: RE: New Cygwin release Karl M sent the following at Tuesday, March 08, 2011 4:57 PM Is another Cygwin release planned for after the current round of bug fixes settles down and before

RE: New Cygwin release

> From: BBuchbinder > Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 18:49:29 -0500 > Subject: RE: New Cygwin release > > Karl M sent the following at Tuesday, March 08, 2011 4:57 PM > >Is another Cygwin release planned for after the current round of bug > >fixes settles down and before signifi

RE: New Cygwin release

Karl M sent the following at Tuesday, March 08, 2011 4:57 PM >Is another Cygwin release planned for after the current round of bug >fixes settles down and before significant new development starts again? As of last Monday: http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2011-02/msg00583.html - Barry Disc

New Cygwin release

Hi All... Is another Cygwin release planned for after the current round of bug fixes settles down and before significant new development starts again? Thanks, ...Karl -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ

Patch on an old doc http://mirror.mcs.anl.gov/pub/cygwin/release/README

http://mirror.mcs.anl.gov/pub/cygwin/release/README -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- - - - Jason Pyeron PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us - - Principal Consultant 10 West

Re: Latest Cygwin Release 5 month old...

On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 02:31:38PM -0600, Warren Young wrote: >Linda Walsh wrote: >>Really? a 6 y/o, 800MHz Celeron w/512M, & 4MB video taken out of main >>memory? You have alot more patience than me. > >That's well over VMWare's recommended minimum configuration. I'm >pretty sure the first mach

Re: Latest Cygwin Release 5 month old...

Linda Walsh wrote: Really? a 6 y/o, 800MHz Celeron w/512M, & 4MB video taken out of main memory? You have alot more patience than me. That's well over VMWare's recommended minimum configuration. I'm pretty sure the first machine I used VMware on was in roughly that same class. I was using

Re: Latest Cygwin Release 5 month old...

Really? a 6 y/o, 800MHz Celeron w/512M, & 4MB video taken out of main memory? You have alot more patience than me. -l Jim Drash wrote: I run VMWare on on just such a configuration. On 6/22/06, Linda Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Perhaps, but you are assuming one's primary Windows machine

Re: Latest Cygwin Release 5 month old...

I run VMWare on on just such a configuration. On 6/22/06, Linda Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Perhaps, but you are assuming one's primary Windows machine is capable of being "virtually subdivided". I run windows on a laptop (external keyb, mouse, screen). While it was a good laptop new, it

Re: Latest Cygwin Release 5 month old...

Perhaps, but you are assuming one's primary Windows machine is capable of being "virtually subdivided". I run windows on a laptop (external keyb, mouse, screen). While it was a good laptop new, it's a bit long in tooth. Jim Drash wrote: Not everyone has a spare test machine. I can never re

Re: Latest Cygwin Release 5 month old...

On Wednesday, June 21, 2006 4:14 PM [EST], Charli Li wrote: VMWare player is only for *PLAYING* VMWare files. In order to set a VM up you gotta get VMWare Desktop or VMWare Server, like I have here on my box. Plus, VMs are much, much slower than normal boxes so it's not really a red herring if

RE: Latest Cygwin Release 5 month old...

-Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 4:04 PM > To: cygwin@cygwin.com > Subject: Re: Latest Cygwin Release 5 month old... > > >> Not everyone has a spare test machine. > > I can never remember if we are supposed to top

Re: Latest Cygwin Release 5 month old...

Not everyone has a spare test machine. I can never remember if we are supposed to top-quote or not. But here goes: If you need a spare test machine you should look into the VMWare Player. It is free and allows you to run a Virtual Machine on your desktop. Saying: "I don't have a spare machine"

Re: Latest Cygwin Release 5 month old... (gold star alert)

On Tue, 20 Jun 2006, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 03:24:04PM -0700, Brian Dessent wrote: > >Linda Walsh wrote: > > > >> Nobody like to hear "oh, it's fixed in the latest build, but > >> not in the released product." > > > >Whether they like it or not doesn't change the s

Re: Latest Cygwin Release 5 month old... (gold star alert)

On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 03:24:04PM -0700, Brian Dessent wrote: >Linda Walsh wrote: > >> Nobody like to hear "oh, it's fixed in the latest build, but >> not in the released product." > >Whether they like it or not doesn't change the situation at all. The >fact remains that very often reported p

Re: Latest Cygwin Release 5 month old...

Linda Walsh wrote: > Nobody like to hear "oh, it's fixed in the latest build, but > not in the released product." Whether they like it or not doesn't change the situation at all. The fact remains that very often reported problems are fixed in snapshots, so saying "try a snapshot first" is a

Re: Latest Cygwin Release 5 month old...

Brian Dessent wrote: The last release of Cygwin was 1.5.19-4 on 2006-01-20, so unless you have a time machine, a fix made on 2006-05-17 will not be included. Besides, using the latest snapshot should always be the first thing you try when encountering a problem before reporting it to the list.

Re: Mirror, Mirroring, Download, Downloading Cygwin Release Using rsync

Brian Dessent wrote: L Anderson wrote: Initially I used --exclude but decided it was safer to ask for what I want rather than for everything but what I don't want. If a subdirectory that I don't want is added to the mirror, it gets downloaded until I discover it and change the --exclude to exclude

Re: Mirror, Mirroring, Download, Downloading Cygwin Release Using rsync

L Anderson wrote: > Initially I used --exclude but decided it was safer to ask for what I > want rather than for everything but what I don't want. If a subdirectory > that I don't want is added to the mirror, it gets downloaded until I > discover it and change the --exclude to exclude it. The mirr

Re: Mirror, Mirroring, Download, Downloading Cygwin Release Using rsync

Brian Dessent wrote: L Anderson wrote: I use rsync to maintain a local Cygwin release mirror so I can use Setup to locally install anything from Cygwin release on a number of PCs on my network. I do too but without the script part. I just have a line in my crontab: 00 10,22 * * * rsync -rlt

Re: Mirror, Mirroring, Download, Downloading Cygwin Release Using rsync

L Anderson wrote: > I use rsync to maintain a local Cygwin release mirror so I can use Setup > to locally install anything from Cygwin release on a number of PCs on my > network. I do too but without the script part. I just have a line in my crontab: 00 10,22 * * * rsync -rlt --exc

Mirror, Mirroring, Download, Downloading Cygwin Release Using rsync

script below. I use rsync to maintain a local Cygwin release mirror so I can use Setup to locally install anything from Cygwin release on a number of PCs on my network. I have been doing this for several years with virtually no problems--except for the occasional rsync mirror that comes or g

Re: Request for a version/ revision/ release number for the whole cygwin release/ distribution

On Oct 6 11:09, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 02:47:15PM +0200, Reini Urban wrote: > >Go with the Redhat scheme and use "Cygwin 1.6.0". > > Please don't do this. Red Hat is using the even numbers. I don't know > if there is already a 1.6.0 [...] There is. Corinna -- Co

Re: Request for a version/ revision/ release number for the whole cygwin release/ distribution

th the Redhat scheme and use "Cygwin 1.6.0". Please don't do this. Red Hat is using the even numbers. I don't know if there is already a 1.6.0 or not but there's certainly no reason to irritate the organization which is providing the network bandwidth for the cygwin release.

Re: Request for a version/ revision/ release number for the whole cygwin release/ distribution

On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 10:19:29PM -0700, Karl M wrote: >Hi All... > >What about calling it B21? ":> It's as good a name for vaporware as any. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http

Re: Request for a version/ revision/ release number for the whole Cygwin release/ distribution

Karl M schrieb: What about calling it B21? ":> As already discussed on cygwin-talk and as officially described on the webpage, "B" stood for Beta that times (up to 1998). We are already stable since a few years, though we use uneven version numbers, marking it as developer releases. So we coul

Re: Request for a version/ revision/ release number for the whole Cygwin release/ distribution

On Oct 5 22:19, Karl M wrote: > Hi All... > > What about calling it B21? ":> *cough* Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Red Hat, Inc. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#un

Re: Request for a version/ revision/ release number for the whole Cygwin release/ distribution

n/ release number for the whole Cygwin release/ distribution Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2004 21:00:37 -0700 On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 22:31:26 -0700, David Christensen wrote: > Per the Cygwin FAQ (http://cygwin.com/faq.html): > > "If you are looking for the version number for the whole Cygwin

Re: Request for a version/ revision/ release number for the whole Cygwin release/ distribution

On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 22:31:26 -0700, David Christensen wrote: > Per the Cygwin FAQ (http://cygwin.com/faq.html): > > "If you are looking for the version number for the whole Cygwin > release, there is none. Each package in the Cygwin release has its own > version. Th

Re: Bugzilla (was: whole cygwin release/ distribution issues)

Dave Korn wrote: > Hey! I found a bug in b19! I wanna report it! Dude, upgrade to B20. It has no defects whatsoever. It even has toast and coffee waiting for me every morning. Brian -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com

RE: Bugzilla (was: whole cygwin release/ distribution issues)

> -Original Message- > From: Jörg Schaible > Sent: 05 October 2004 10:26 > To: Dave Korn; cygwin > Subject: RE: Bugzilla (was: whole cygwin release/ distribution issues) > > Dave Korn wrote on Tuesday, October 05, 2004 11:14 AM: > > > Hey! I found a

RE: Bugzilla (was: whole cygwin release/ distribution issues)

Dave Korn wrote on Tuesday, October 05, 2004 11:14 AM: > Hey! I found a bug in b19! I wanna report it! Forget it! Was fixed in B20 and that one had no bugs EVER! - Jörg -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html

RE: Bugzilla (was: whole cygwin release/ distribution issues)

> -Original Message- > From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Corinna Vinschen > Sent: 05 October 2004 09:33 > > > Version: > > 1.0 (official) > > 1.3.x > > Do we really need the old versions? > > > 1.5.10 > > 1.5.11 > > snapshot Hey! I found a bug in b

Re: Bugzilla (was: whole cygwin release/ distribution issues)

On Oct 4 23:15, Reini Urban wrote: > Reini Urban schrieb: > >Product: add "Cygwin" > > long description: Corinna? What's the question? > >Version: > > Should probably be based on the cygwin dll versions: > > 1.3.x > > 1.5.10 > > 1.5.11 > > latest snapshot > > T

Re: whole cygwin release/ distribution issues

On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 11:56:28PM +0200, Reini Urban wrote: >Brian Dessent schrieb: >>Reini Urban wrote: >>>Ok. Just an additional entry in the "Product" list >>>at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/ >> >>Surely you mean and it >>looks like a few c

Re: whole Cygwin release/ distribution issues

Gerrit P. Haase schrieb: Hallo Reini, Am Montag, 4. Oktober 2004 um 21:06 schriebst du: * perl layout (better upgrade convenience) will be changed in the next update, I promise;) So we'll need another full recompile of all our extensions? :) No problem, if it stays then until perl6 or another xs A

Re: whole cygwin release/ distribution issues

Brian Dessent schrieb: Reini Urban wrote: Ok. Just an additional entry in the "Product" list at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/ Surely you mean and it looks like a few categories are already there. I don't think the Redhat project cares about ou

Re: whole Cygwin release/ distribution issues

Hallo Reini, Am Montag, 4. Oktober 2004 um 21:06 schriebst du: > Gerrit P. Haase schrieb: >>>gcc-core > 3.3.3 >>> needs libtool-devel-1.5.10 (still in test) for >>> libtoolized packages: .rdata bug >> >> Not a bug, a feature? > ?? I don't know if it is a bug or a feature, it may well be

Bugzilla (was: whole cygwin release/ distribution issues)

Reini Urban schrieb: Product: add "Cygwin" long description: Corinna? Version: Should probably be based on the cygwin dll versions: 1.3.x 1.5.10 1.5.11 latest snapshot Then there is the remaining problem with existing Redhat support for the official Cygwin ver

Re: whole cygwin release/ distribution issues

Reini Urban wrote: > Ok. Just an additional entry in the "Product" list > at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/ Surely you mean and it looks like a few categories are already there. I don't think the Redhat project cares about our bugs. :-) Bri

Re: whole cygwin release/ distribution issues

On Mon, 4 Oct 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote: > Actually, I think that one of the 3+ developers even volunteered to > help maintain bugzilla when I mentioned this on cygwin-developers. I'm feeling rather +'ish today ;-). Well, the original offer and conditions still stand: "I volunteer to share

Re: whole cygwin release/ distribution issues

Christopher Faylor schrieb: On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 10:16:51PM +0200, Reini Urban wrote: Ah, I see. You meant something different. Just a bugzilla or mantis "Know issues" site. A bugtracker. Couldn't ITP's be tracked also then? Hmm, I'll think of it. I'd need shell access to sourceware then. Y

RE: whole Cygwin release/ distribution issues

Reini Urban wrote: > Expected problems: > * freshly added gif support in libgd > * libungif pending and problematic X dependencies for libtool. > * sysbash package pending (to test service problems) > * ExplorerHere package pending (often requested feature) Eh? Just out of curiosity; is this any

Re: whole cygwin release/ distribution issues

On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 10:16:51PM +0200, Reini Urban wrote: >Ah, I see. You meant something different. Just a bugzilla or mantis >"Know issues" site. A bugtracker. Couldn't ITP's be tracked also >then? > >Hmm, I'll think of it. I'd need shell access to sourceware then. You wouldn't need shel

Re: whole cygwin release/ distribution issues

Christopher Faylor schrieb: On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 09:11:15PM +0200, Reini Urban wrote: Christopher Faylor schrieb: Would you like to volunteer to maintain a "known issues" type of list which could be sent here periodically? Taking over from Igor? Did Igor volunteer somewhere? I did an archive se

Re: whole cygwin release/ distribution issues

On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 09:11:15PM +0200, Reini Urban wrote: >Christopher Faylor schrieb: >>Reini, >>Would you like to volunteer to maintain a "known issues" type of list >>which could be sent here periodically? > >Taking over from Igor? Did Igor volunteer somewhere? I did an archive search and o

Re: whole cygwin release/ distribution issues

Christopher Faylor schrieb: Reini, Would you like to volunteer to maintain a "known issues" type of list which could be sent here periodically? Taking over from Igor? Sorry, not enough time right now, maybe later. When time permits I can send reminders. I already sent a private reminder to busy Ja

Re: whole Cygwin release/ distribution issues

Gerrit P. Haase schrieb: gcc-core > 3.3.3 needs libtool-devel-1.5.10 (still in test) for libtoolized packages: .rdata bug Not a bug, a feature? ?? same as the new libtool strictness which we don't quite like. (pass_all) old-style dlltool/dllwrap works just fine for me. postgreql-7.4.5 pgper

RE: Request for a version/ revision/ release number for the whole Cygwin release/ distribution

> It would seem that bin #1 is consuming the majority of the effort. I > think that by changing priorities and re-allocating people and > resources, it should be possible to create integration tests and a > "stable" distribution. Such would increase Cygwin's acceptance and > usage for potentially

RE: Request for a version/ revision/ release number for the whole Cygwin release/ distribution

> -Original Message- > From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Andrew DeFaria > Sent: 04 October 2004 19:19 > Gary R. Van Sickle wrote: > > >> How many people have heard The Two Rules of Customer Service? > >> > >> 1. The customer is always right. > > > The customer is indeed *NOT* always right b

Re: Request for a version/ revision/ release number for the whole Cygwin release/ distribution

Gary R. Van Sickle wrote: How many people have heard The Two Rules of Customer Service? 1. The customer is always right. The customer is indeed *NOT* always right but the trick is usually to make them *think* there always right. 2. When the customer is wrong, refer to rule #1. Everybody. How man

RE: Request for a version/ revision/ release number for the whole Cygwin release/ distribution

On Sat, 2 Oct 2004, David Christensen wrote: > I disagree. Assume for a moment that all Cygwin project member > development efforts can be put into the following bins: > > 1. Code development. > > 2. Design documentation. > > 3. Test suite development. > > 4. Test suite documentation. > > 5.

Re: whole cygwin release/ distribution issues (need new squid maintainer)

On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 07:28:05PM +0200, Dr. Volker Zell wrote: >squid needs a recompile: > > o http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2003-10/msg00554.html Actually, the issue is that we need a squid maintainer, AFAIK. Any volunteers? cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscri

Re: whole Cygwin release/ distribution issues

> Reini Urban writes: > Maybe just start with issues for the binary packages: > Issues known to me so far: > ITP moratorium / SC (Steering Committee) idea? >http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2004-03/msg00036.html > coreutils >missing (required) >http://c

Re: whole cygwin release/ distribution issues

On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 06:45:20PM +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: >Hello Reini, > >> gcc-core > 3.3.3 >>needs libtool-devel-1.5.10 (still in test) for >> libtoolized packages: .rdata bug > >Not a bug, a feature? > >> postgreql-7.4.5 >>pgperl fails > >Why? > > >> gnome2 >>stable? >>

Re: whole Cygwin release/ distribution issues

Hello Reini, > gcc-core > 3.3.3 >needs libtool-devel-1.5.10 (still in test) for > libtoolized packages: .rdata bug Not a bug, a feature? > postgreql-7.4.5 >pgperl fails Why? > gnome2 >stable? >some packages missing. far away from stable... > * perl layout (better upgra

whole Cygwin release/ distribution issues

Dave Korn schrieb: -Original Message- From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of David Christensen Sent: 03 October 2004 03:15 Would you be interested in mentoring a willing volunteer? Certainly. Just stand still right here for just one minute KER-SQUELCH-SPLAT-SMACK [sou

RE: Fixing quoting in Outlook (Was RE: Request for a version/ rev ision/ release number for the whole Cygwin release/ distribution)

Brian Dessent wrote: > Fred Kulack wrote: > >> Yeah, I use Outlook Express or Lotus Notes. >> I never know what the hell you all are talking about WRT this >> topic... >> >> You mean you can display messages other than time (or another >> column) ordered? Hmmm... Interesting... > > Good god, ho

Re: Fixing quoting in Outlook (Was RE: Request for a version/ rev ision/ release number for the whole Cygwin release/ distribution)

Fred Kulack wrote: > Yeah, I use Outlook Express or Lotus Notes. > I never know what the hell you all are talking about WRT this topic... > > You mean you can display messages other than time (or another column) > ordered? > Hmmm... Interesting... Good god, how do you get anything done without t

Re: Request for a version/ revision/ release number for the whole cygwin release/ distribution

On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 08:24:35AM -0700, Steven E. Harris wrote: >Christopher Faylor writes: >>The total number of unique subscribers to cygwin, cygwin-apps, >>cygwin-talk, cygwin-xfree is 2542. > >That count may fall short by not taking into account those who read, >say, gmane.os.cygwin, but do n

RE: Fixing quoting in Outlook (Was RE: Request for a version/ rev ision/ release number for the whole Cygwin release/ distribution)

On 10/04/2004 at 04:17:53 AM, cygwin-owner wrote: 2) I start to forget that real mail clients thread properly. --- end of excerpt --- Yeah, I use Outlook Express or Lotus Notes. I never know what the hell you all are talking about WRT this topic... You mean you can display messages other than t

RE:[OT] Request for a version/ revision/ release number for the whole Cygwin release/ distribution

On Mon, 4 Oct 2004, Hughes, Bill wrote: > Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > > On Mon, 4 Oct 2004, Dave Korn wrote: > ..snip.. > >> Certainly. Just stand still right here for just one minute > >> > >>KER-SQUELCH-SPLAT-SMACK > >> [sound of massive slap round face with a very

Re: Request for a version/ revision/ release number for the whole cygwin release/ distribution

Christopher Faylor writes: > The total number of unique subscribers to cygwin, cygwin-apps, > cygwin-talk, cygwin-xfree is 2542. That count may fall short by not taking into account those who read, say, gmane.os.cygwin, but do not subscribe to the cygwin list. -- Steven E. Harris -- Unsubscri

RE: Request for a version/ revision/ release number for the whole Cygwin release/ distribution

> -Original Message- > From: Igor Pechtchanski > Sent: 04 October 2004 15:31 > I just felt that this sums up the whole volunteering bit > nicely. Though perhaps it's time to TITTTL... Seconded! cheers, DaveK -- Can't think of a witty .sigline today -- Unsubscribe

RE:[OT] Request for a version/ revision/ release number for the w hole Cygwin release/ distribution

Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > On Mon, 4 Oct 2004, Dave Korn wrote: ..snip.. >> Certainly. Just stand still right here for just one minute >> >>KER-SQUELCH-SPLAT-SMACK >> [sound of massive slap round face with a very wet kipper] >> >> That'll learn 'im! Ha, I've never

RE: Request for a version/ revision/ release number for the whole Cygwin release/ distribution

On Mon, 4 Oct 2004, Dave Korn wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of David Christensen > > Sent: 03 October 2004 03:15 > > > Would you be interested in mentoring a willing volunteer? > > > Certainly. Just stand still right here for just one minute > >

RE: Request for a version/ revision/ release number for the whole Cygwin release/ distribution

> -Original Message- > From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of David Christensen > Sent: 03 October 2004 03:15 > Would you be interested in mentoring a willing volunteer? Certainly. Just stand still right here for just one minute KER-SQUELCH-SPLAT-SMACK [sound of

Re: Request for a version/ revision/ release number for the whole Cygwin release/ distribution

Mike Kenny - BCX - Infrastructure Services wrote: -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of David Christensen Sent: Sunday, October 03, 2004 4:15 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Request for a version/ revision/ release number for the whole Cygwin

  1   2   >