RE: (now OT) cygwin processes and system'ed processes using 100% CPU

On Wed, 28 Jan 2004, Hughes, Bill wrote: > I'll have to check the rfcs about mailing list protocols sometime. This may be a starting place: http://search.cpan.org/~mstevens/Mail-ListDetector-0.29/MANIFEST -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: ht

RE: (now OT) cygwin processes and system'ed processes using 100% CPU

On Wed, 28 Jan 2004, Dave Korn wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Dave Korn > > I mis-spoke and must correct myself, despite the massive o-t-ness of this > thread : > > > In doing so, he completely ignores the *third* option, > > "Reply to just the list"

RE: (now OT) cygwin processes and system'ed processes using 100% CPU

On Wed, 28 Jan 2004, Dave Korn wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Brian Dessent > > > *sigh* No, that's how mailing lists are supposed to work. > > Lists where the ML software forces the Reply-To to the list > > address are broken. See > >

RE: (now OT) cygwin processes and system'ed processes using 100% CPU

It may be Bad Form to respond to oneself but : > Sent: 28 January 2004 13:44 From: Hughes, Bill > > > Sent: 28 January 2004 13:18 From: Dave Korn ..snip.. > > 3>It limits a subscriber's freedom to choose how he or she > > will direct a > > response. > > > > Again, I'll agree that munging sh

RE: (now OT) cygwin processes and system'ed processes using 100% CPU

> Sent: 28 January 2004 13:18 From: Dave Korn > > From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Brian Dessent > > > *sigh* No, that's how mailing lists are supposed to work. > > Lists where the ML software forces the Reply-To to the list > > address are broken. See > >

RE: (now OT) cygwin processes and system'ed processes using 100% CPU

> -Original Message- > From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Dave Korn I mis-spoke and must correct myself, despite the massive o-t-ness of this thread : > In doing so, he completely ignores the *third* option, > "Reply to just the list" - in fact, such an option is not > mentioned onc

RE: (now OT) cygwin processes and system'ed processes using 100% CPU

> -Original Message- > From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Brian Dessent > *sigh* No, that's how mailing lists are supposed to work. > Lists where the ML software forces the Reply-To to the list > address are broken. See > Without hav

Re: (now OT) cygwin processes and system'ed processes using 100% CPU

Steven Hartland wrote: > > Brian Dessent wrote: > > *sigh* No, that's how mailing lists are supposed to work. Lists where > > the ML software forces the Reply-To to the list address are broken. See > > In fact, you'll find > > that the mailing l

RE: (waaay OT and getting further with every passing moment!) cygwin processes and system'ed processes using 100% CPU

> -Original Message- > From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Brian Dessent > What Chris didn't explicitly say in that message was that > "set the Reply-To header" means "set the Reply-To header to > the list address." > So if you follow the directions, your posts will have a "Reply-To: > [

Re: (now OT) cygwin processes and system'ed processes using 100% CPU

Brian Dessent wrote: > *sigh* No, that's how mailing lists are supposed to work. Lists where > the ML software forces the Reply-To to the list address are broken. See > In fact, you'll find > that the mailing list software used here does nothing

Re: cygwin processes and system'ed processes using 100% CPU

Dave Korn wrote: > > http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2003-12/msg00652.html > > I've read that message a dozen times, and I can't make head or tail of it. > > It seems to be saying that you can post to the list in a special way that > adds a "Reply-To" header to your post with your own email

Re: (now OT) cygwin processes and system'ed processes using 100% CPU

Steven Hartland wrote: > That's one for the notes for the future. A totally new subject and > new content tends to indicate a new thread to my mail reader > but I suppose all are not created even. Real email programs use the "In-Reply-To" and/or "References" headers to determine which message an

Re: cygwin processes and system'ed processes using 100% CPU

On Tue, 27 Jan 2004, Steven Hartland wrote: > Thanks for that but doesn't seem like strace -p works > it just returns to the command line instantly no errors no > nothing. > Your usage is correct. Let me guess, this is strace from 1.5.5. It was broken in this regard. Please use the strace and D

RE: cygwin processes and system'ed processes using 100% CPU

On Tue, 27 Jan 2004, Dave Korn wrote: > > From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Brian Ford > Try it, it works. Notice the above :). > Brian Ford wrote: > > http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2003-12/msg00652.html > > > I've read that message a dozen times, and I can't make head or tail of it. > > It

Re: cygwin processes and system'ed processes using 100% CPU

Thanks for that but doesn't seem like strace -p works it just returns to the command line instantly no errors no nothing. using: strace -o test.txt -p 1676 I just get an empty file then strace quits. Cant see anything stupid Im missing were ps -al gives: PIDPPIDPGID WINPID TTY UID

RE: cygwin processes and system'ed processes using 100% CPU

> -Original Message- > From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Brian Ford > > Does appear the list software needs a bit of an update though. > > The issue with it setting personal address as the reply to > field could > > do with being fixed at the very least would save a lot of hassle. > > >

Re: cygwin processes and system'ed processes using 100% CPU

On Tue, 27 Jan 2004, Steven Hartland wrote: > That's one for the notes for the future. A totally new subject and > new content tends to indicate a new thread to my mail reader > but I suppose all are not created even. > Use a better reader :). > Does appear the list software needs a bit of an up

Re: cygwin processes and system'ed processes using 100% CPU

From: "Brian Ford" Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2004 5:05 PM Subject: Re: cygwin processes and system'ed processes using 100% CPU > On Tue, 27 Jan 2004, Steven Hartland wrote: > > > Sorry did I miss something where was the new issue? > > > My mailer and the

RE: cygwin processes and system'ed processes using 100% CPU

> -Original Message- > From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Steven Hartland > Sent: 27 January 2004 16:49 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: cygwin processes and system'ed processes using 100% CPU > > Sorry did I miss something where was the new issue? > &

Re: cygwin processes and system'ed processes using 100% CPU

On Tue, 27 Jan 2004, Steven Hartland wrote: > Sorry did I miss something where was the new issue? > My mailer and the list archives show your original message as a reply to: http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2004-01/msg01171.html So, the new issue was your original one. -- Brian Ford Senior Real

Re: cygwin processes and system'ed processes using 100% CPU

Sorry did I miss something where was the new issue? Steve - Original Message - From: "Brian Ford" Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2004 4:22 PM Subject: Re: cygwin processes and system'ed processes using 100% CPU > Please start a new thread rather than replying to

Re: cygwin processes and system'ed processes using 100% CPU

Please start a new thread rather than replying to an old one for new issues. On Tue, 27 Jan 2004, Steven Hartland wrote: > General question has anyone else seen processes running under > cygwin using 100% CPU when the shouldn't. > The background is cygwin 1.5.5 I have a perl script which > monito

Re: cygwin processes and system'ed processes using 100% CPU

004 2:50 PM Subject: Re: cygwin processes and system'ed processes using 100% CPU > Try upgrading to 1.5.6-1 and retest. A lot of things causing aberrant CPU > and memory using and process hangs have been fixed with this release. No > promises that it covers your problem, but anyone

Re: cygwin processes and system'ed processes using 100% CPU

their told anything else. Brian Kelly "Steven Hartland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@cygwin.com on 01/27/2004 09:43:35 AM Sent by:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: (bcc: Brian Kelly/WTC1/Empire) Subject:cygwin processes and system'ed processes using 100% C

cygwin processes and system'ed processes using 100% CPU

General question has anyone else seen processes running under cygwin using 100% CPU when the shouldn't. The background is cygwin 1.5.5 I have a perl script which monitors process cpu levels. It does this using serveral system calls to other utils, ps, vmstat and pslist ( win32 app from sysinternals