On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 01:08:49PM +0100, Reini Urban wrote:
>Christopher Faylor schrieb:
>>On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 05:23:54AM +0100, Reini Urban wrote:
>>>Corinna Vinschen schrieb:
when reading http://cygwin.com/licensing.html, you will find that the
licensing of Cygwin is pretty clear.
>>
Christopher Faylor schrieb:
On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 05:23:54AM +0100, Reini Urban wrote:
Corinna Vinschen schrieb:
when reading http://cygwin.com/licensing.html, you will find that the
licensing of Cygwin is pretty clear.
Cygwin is Open Source, provided under the GNU Public License.
That means ba
On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 05:23:54AM +0100, Reini Urban wrote:
>Corinna Vinschen schrieb:
>>when reading http://cygwin.com/licensing.html, you will find that the
>>licensing of Cygwin is pretty clear.
>>
>>Cygwin is Open Source, provided under the GNU Public License.
>>
>>That means basically, that a
Corinna Vinschen schrieb:
when reading http://cygwin.com/licensing.html, you will find that the
licensing of Cygwin is pretty clear.
Cygwin is Open Source, provided under the GNU Public License.
That means basically, that all software linked against the Cygwin library
is automatically Open Source
Hi Rick,
On Mar 31 08:06, Hanson, Richard Mr CAA wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I work at an agency for the US Army and in making a software procurement (really,
> installation) request for cygwin, a few developers here were surprised to find out
> that RedHat charges the government for the use of cyg
Greetings,
I work at an agency for the US Army and in making a software procurement (really,
installation) request for cygwin, a few developers here were surprised to find out
that RedHat charges the government for the use of cygwin. Our IT manager:
This software is not free to the Governm
6 matches
Mail list logo