Szymon Lapinski wrote:
I'm not sure if this was caused by SP2 or by some of following Windows
updates but it used to work well before SP2, and still works well on
Windows 2000.
(...)
> time gawk 'BEGIN{for(i=1;i<1000;i++){system("true")}}'
> time for i in `seq 1 1000`; do bash -c true; done
I
Carlo Florendo wrote:
> Szymon Lapinski wrote:
>> Recently I found a serious performance degradation in my gawk scripts
>> while running on WinXP x64 SP2, it appears that this is not only gawk
>> problem, but spawning child processes in a subshell at all.
(...)
> Child processes failing means that
Carlo Florendo wrote:
Szymon Lapinski wrote:
Recently I found a serious performance degradation in my gawk scripts
while running on WinXP x64 SP2, it appears that this is not only gawk
problem, but spawning child processes in a subshell at all.
Your cygcheck looks clean.
Child processes fail
Szymon Lapinski wrote:
Recently I found a serious performance degradation in my gawk scripts
while running on WinXP x64 SP2, it appears that this is not only gawk
problem, but spawning child processes in a subshell at all.
Your cygcheck looks clean.
Child processes failing means that there co
Recently I found a serious performance degradation in my gawk scripts
while running on WinXP x64 SP2, it appears that this is not only gawk
problem, but spawning child processes in a subshell at all.
I'm not sure if this was caused by SP2 or by some of following Windows
updates but it used to
5 matches
Mail list logo
