Re: [Mostly to Charles Wilson] Upgrading Cygwin's CVS

2003-01-06 Thread Charles Wilson
Robert Collins wrote: On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 01:08, Jason Tishler wrote: On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 07:58:48PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote: Because of all that, I'd pretty much decided that the next time I update the 'cvs' package, I'm going to use the cvsnt codebase Well, there's always Subve

Re: [Mostly to Charles Wilson] Upgrading Cygwin's CVS

2003-01-06 Thread Robert Collins
On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 01:08, Jason Tishler wrote: > On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 07:58:48PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote: > > Because of all that, I'd pretty much decided that the next time I > > update the 'cvs' package, I'm going to use the cvsnt codebase > > Well, there's always Subversion: > >

Re: [Mostly to Charles Wilson] Upgrading Cygwin's CVS

2003-01-06 Thread Jason Tishler
On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 07:58:48PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote: > Because of all that, I'd pretty much decided that the next time I > update the 'cvs' package, I'm going to use the cvsnt codebase Well, there's always Subversion: http://subversion.tigris.org :,) Jason -- PGP/GPG Key: http:

Re: [Mostly to Charles Wilson] Upgrading Cygwin's CVS

2003-01-05 Thread Charles Wilson
Max Bowsher wrote: Data point: I'm running cvs-1.11.4 compiled OOTB. Admittedly thats in flatfile-dbm emulation mode (MY_NBDM), but I need that to work with repositories using that mode. Am I right in saying that your patches consist of cosmetically updating cygwin32 -> cygwin, and enabling the u

Re: [Mostly to Charles Wilson] Upgrading Cygwin's CVS

2003-01-05 Thread Max Bowsher
Charles Wilson wrote: > Max Bowsher wrote: >> In http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2002-06/msg00754.html, Charles >> withdrew a test cvs-1.11.2 package, saying that some bugs had been >> found. I've recently compiled cvs 1.11.4 for myself, because I >> wanted the new rlog command. I was wondering

Re: [Mostly to Charles Wilson] Upgrading Cygwin's CVS

2003-01-04 Thread Charles Wilson
Max Bowsher wrote: In http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2002-06/msg00754.html, Charles withdrew a test cvs-1.11.2 package, saying that some bugs had been found. I've recently compiled cvs 1.11.4 for myself, because I wanted the new rlog command. I was wondering what these bugs were, in case I mi

[Mostly to Charles Wilson] Upgrading Cygwin's CVS

2003-01-04 Thread Max Bowsher
In http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2002-06/msg00754.html, Charles withdrew a test cvs-1.11.2 package, saying that some bugs had been found. I've recently compiled cvs 1.11.4 for myself, because I wanted the new rlog command. I was wondering what these bugs were, in case I might encounter them i

Re: cygwin's cvs

2002-05-18 Thread Charles Wilson
Lapo Luchini wrote: > I added Cc to Charles Wilson, CygWin's CVS package mantainer, sorry if > I quote everything, but it's for him getting a sense out of the message ^_^ > > Introduction: I filed a bug on TortoiceCVS "feature reqeust" tracker to >