RE: cvs - cygwin1.dll recompile - configure fails in w32api/

2003-11-12 Thread Hannu E K Nevalainen
> From: Peter J. Stieber > Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 6:56 PM > Just tried this myself this morning (11/12/2003 9:00 AM PST) and > it worked. > > Definitely did not need the "Remedy". > > Pete Hmm... I did the 'cvs co' a few days earlier. I suppose it was fixed in between. /Hannu E K

Re: cvs - cygwin1.dll recompile - configure fails in w32api/

2003-11-12 Thread Peter J. Stieber
Just tried this myself this morning (11/12/2003 9:00 AM PST) and it worked. Definitely did not need the "Remedy". Pete > $ cd / > $ rm -rf src > $ export CVSROOT=:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/src ;\ > cvs login ;\ > cvs -z3 checkout winsup ;\ > cd /obj ;\ > /src/configure --enable-debuggin

cvs - cygwin1.dll recompile - configure fails in w32api/

2003-11-11 Thread Hannu E K Nevalainen
$ cd / $ rm -rf src $ export CVSROOT=:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/src ;\ cvs login ;\ cvs -z3 checkout winsup ;\ cd /obj ;\ /src/configure --enable-debugging --prefix=/install -v 2>&1 | \ tee configure.log ; \ cd .. configuring in w32api running /bin/sh /src/winsup/w32api/configure --ho

Re: RFD: cygwin-bug mailing list/bugzilla [was Re: Bug in cvs cygwin1.dll ?]

2002-10-18 Thread Ralf Hauser
Nicholas Wourms wrote: [snip] Furthermore, if we were to establish a profile on the redhat bugzilla, I believe that bug-reporting could be streamlined and potentially provide more details. At the very least, it would mean less things for people to remeber to do. I strongly support this because

Re: cvs cygwin1.dll

2002-09-27 Thread Guy Harrison
On Thu, 26 Sep 2002 10:42:56 -0400, Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 05:20:53AM +, Guy Harrison wrote: [snip] >>If I knew unix I probably could - it's preventing me understanding >>crucial aspects of the cygwin dll. Nevertheless, methinks we're both >>c

Re: cvs cygwin1.dll

2002-09-26 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 05:20:53AM +, Guy Harrison wrote: >On Sun, 22 Sep 2002 12:40:54 -0400, Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >wrote: I don't think it has anything to do with suspended threads. You can certainly verify this by adding code to kill the threads specifically,

Re: cvs cygwin1.dll

2002-09-25 Thread Guy Harrison
On Sun, 22 Sep 2002 12:40:54 -0400, Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>On Fri, Sep 20, 2002 at 11:26:42AM +, Guy Harrison wrote: On Wed, 18 Sep 2002 15:35:53 -0400, Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>Shame us non-developers can't get it "readonly". >>http

Re: cvs cygwin1.dll

2002-09-22 Thread Robert Collins
On Mon, 2002-09-23 at 02:40, Christopher Faylor wrote: > Robert Collins has vowed to fix this problem this weekend. Until then, > however, I have commented out the code in question. Thatsa ctually a good solution for now. Thoams suggested his approach did the same thing, but I've reviewed it an

Re: cvs cygwin1.dll

2002-09-22 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 03:08:41PM +, Guy Harrison wrote: >On Fri, 20 Sep 2002 11:56:57 -0400, Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >wrote: > >>On Fri, Sep 20, 2002 at 11:26:42AM +, Guy Harrison wrote: >>>On Wed, 18 Sep 2002 15:35:53 -0400, Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>wrote

Re: cvs cygwin1.dll

2002-09-22 Thread Guy Harrison
On Fri, 20 Sep 2002 11:56:57 -0400, Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Fri, Sep 20, 2002 at 11:26:42AM +, Guy Harrison wrote: >>On Wed, 18 Sep 2002 15:35:53 -0400, Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>wrote: Shame us non-developers can't get it "readonly". http://cygwin.c

Re: cvs cygwin1.dll

2002-09-20 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Fri, Sep 20, 2002 at 11:26:42AM +, Guy Harrison wrote: >On Wed, 18 Sep 2002 15:35:53 -0400, Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >wrote: > >>On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 06:42:50PM +, Guy Harrison wrote: >>>On Fri, 13 Sep 2002 08:58:16 -0400, Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>wrote

Re: cvs cygwin1.dll

2002-09-20 Thread Guy Harrison
On Wed, 18 Sep 2002 15:35:53 -0400, Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 06:42:50PM +, Guy Harrison wrote: >>On Fri, 13 Sep 2002 08:58:16 -0400, Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>wrote: >> >>>On Fri, Sep 13, 2002 at 09:09:37AM +, Guy Harrison wrote

Re: cvs cygwin1.dll

2002-09-18 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 06:42:50PM +, Guy Harrison wrote: >On Fri, 13 Sep 2002 08:58:16 -0400, Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >wrote: > >>On Fri, Sep 13, 2002 at 09:09:37AM +, Guy Harrison wrote: >>>I can't seem to figure out how to set a breakpoint in sigproc.cc without >>>recompi

Re: cvs cygwin1.dll

2002-09-18 Thread Guy Harrison
On Fri, 13 Sep 2002 08:58:16 -0400, Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Fri, Sep 13, 2002 at 09:09:37AM +, Guy Harrison wrote: >>I can't seem to figure out how to set a breakpoint in sigproc.cc without >>recompiling make with debug. Any hints? > >Just attach to the running proce