Re: [PATCH] Re: cvs-1.11.0-1 fails to build

2002-10-21 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Mon, 21 Oct 2002, Jason Tishler wrote: > Igor, > > On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 10:47:59PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > > --- ./src/mygdbm.h2002-10-20 14:44:40.0 -0400 > > +++ ./src/mygdbm.h-orig 2002-10-20 14:44:35.0 -0400 > > The above seems to indicate a reverse pat

[PATCH] Re: cvs-1.11.0-1 fails to build

2002-10-20 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Sun, 20 Oct 2002, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > On Sun, 20 Oct 2002, Max Bowsher wrote: > > > Igor Pechtchanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> I'm having a problem building cvs-1.11.0-1. GDBM_EXPORT is not > > >> picked up as a macro (which I assume it is, as it's used to declare > > >> functi

Re: cvs-1.11.0-1 fails to build

2002-10-20 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Sun, 20 Oct 2002, Max Bowsher wrote: > Igor Pechtchanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I'm having a problem building cvs-1.11.0-1. GDBM_EXPORT is not > >> picked up as a macro (which I assume it is, as it's used to declare > >> functions), and this results in parse errors and gcc being gener

Re: cvs-1.11.0-1 fails to build

2002-10-20 Thread Max Bowsher
Igor Pechtchanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I'm having a problem building cvs-1.11.0-1. GDBM_EXPORT is not >> picked up as a macro (which I assume it is, as it's used to declare >> functions), and this results in parse errors and gcc being generally >> unhappy. I'm attaching the exact error m

cvs-1.11.0-1 fails to build

2002-10-20 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
Hi, I'm having a problem building cvs-1.11.0-1. GDBM_EXPORT is not picked up as a macro (which I assume it is, as it's used to declare functions), and this results in parse errors and gcc being generally unhappy. I'm attaching the exact error message. This is probably because I have gdbm-1.8.0-4