On 20/04/2010 15:06, Csaba Raduly wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Dave Korn wrote:
>> On 19/04/2010 22:16, Martin Ettl wrote:
>>> I used cppcheck
>>> [../machine/mips/strncpy.c:205]
>> Uhh, why is it telling us about the MIPS-only version of strncpy in newlib
>> that we don't even compi
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Dave Korn wrote:
> On 19/04/2010 22:16, Martin Ettl wrote:
>> I used cppcheck
>> [../machine/mips/strncpy.c:205]
>
> Uhh, why is it telling us about the MIPS-only version of strncpy in newlib
> that we don't even compile in?
>
AIUI, that's because cppcheck tries
On 19/04/2010 22:16, Martin Ettl wrote:
> Hello,
>
> you ever run a static code analysis tool on cygwin sources. I have done
> that! I used cppcheck
> (http://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/cppcheck/index.php?title=Main_Page)
> and got the following SEVERE warning messages:
Now you know why peo
Hello,
you ever run a static code analysis tool on cygwin sources. I have done that! I
used cppcheck
(http://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/cppcheck/index.php?title=Main_Page) and
got the following SEVERE warning messages:
[fgetws.c:137]: (Error) Array index -1 corresponds with 4294967295, whi
Hello,
you ever run a static code analysis tool on cygwin sources. I have done that! I
used cppcheck
(http://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/cppcheck/index.php?title=Main_Page) and
got the following SEVERE warning messages:
[fgetws.c:137]: (Error) Array index -1 corresponds with 4294967295, whi
5 matches
Mail list logo