"%a %u %g"
sample
the output is:
770 1001 513
775 1001 513
Why is chmod not working?
OS: Windows 8 Pro 64-bit
Cygwin Setup.exe Version: 2.831 (32-bit)
That looks fine to me.
What do you expect?
Presumably because when the OP asked for 700 he got 770, and when
he asked for 755 he g
"%a %u %g"
> > sample
> >
> > the output is:
> >
> > 770 1001 513
> > 775 1001 513
> >
> > Why is chmod not working?
> >
> > OS: Windows 8 Pro 64-bit
> > Cygwin Setup.exe Version: 2.831 (32-bit)
>
> That looks fine t
01 513
Why is chmod not working?
OS: Windows 8 Pro 64-bit
Cygwin Setup.exe Version: 2.831 (32-bit)
That looks fine to me.
What do you expect?
--
- Bartels
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://
When I type the following sequence of commands:
cd ~; mkdir sample; chmod -R 0700 sample; stat -c "%a %u %g" sample;
rm -rf sample; mkdir sample; chmod -R 0755 sample; stat -c "%a %u %g"
sample
the output is:
770 1001 513
775 1001 513
Why is chmod not working?
OS: Windows
Terrence Brannon wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/.ssh
> $ export CYGWIN=ntsec
In addition to what Dave and Eric already mentioned, "ntsec" is the
default behavior (and has been for many years) so setting "CYGWIN=ntsec"
does essentially nothing.
Brian
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Terrence Brannon on 3/24/2006 10:05 AM:
> Why won't chmod work even after setting CYGWIN properly?
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/.ssh
> $ ls -l
> total 9
> -rw-r--r-- 1 terrence mkgroup-l-d 1675 Mar 14 10:02 id_rsa
> -rw-r--r-- 1 terrence mkgro
On 24 March 2006 17:05, Terrence Brannon wrote:
> Why won't chmod work even after setting CYGWIN properly?
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/.ssh
> $ ls -l
> total 9
> -rw-r--r-- 1 terrence mkgroup-l-d 1675 Mar 14 10:02 id_rsa
> -rw-r--r-- 1 terrence mkgroup-l-d 396 Mar 14 10:02 id_rsa.pub
> -rw-r--r-- 1
Why won't chmod work even after setting CYGWIN properly?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/.ssh
$ ls -l
total 9
-rw-r--r-- 1 terrence mkgroup-l-d 1675 Mar 14 10:02 id_rsa
-rw-r--r-- 1 terrence mkgroup-l-d 396 Mar 14 10:02 id_rsa.pub
-rw-r--r-- 1 terrence mkgroup-l-d 733 Mar 13 12:29 known_hosts
[EMAIL PROTEC
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf
> Of Igor Peshansky
> Sent: Thursday, 12 January 2006 1:54 PM
> To: Matthew Pittman
> Cc: cygwin@cygwin.com
> Subject: RE: chmod not working with ntsec set
>
>
> Ugh, top-posti
;http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#PCYMTNQREAIYR>. Thanks.
> Subject: Re: chmod not working with ntsec set
>
> > On Thu, 12 Jan 2006, Matthew Pittman wrote:
> >
> > > I know this is a dumb question but I have made genuine efforts to
> > > understand what I'
But this is a WAG too.
Any ideas where I go from here?
Regards,
Matt.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf
Of Igor Peshansky
Sent: Thursday, 12 January 2006 12:54 PM
To: Matthew Pittman
Cc: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: chmod not working with ntse
On Thu, 12 Jan 2006, Matthew Pittman wrote:
> I know this is a dumb question but I have made genuine efforts to
> understand what I'm doing wrong and I'm still missing the point. Sorry
> for wasting your time.
>
> I've installed cygwin under WXP in a domain. When I first started bash
> I got a w
Hi,
I know this is a dumb question but I have made genuine efforts to understand
what I'm doing wrong and I'm still missing the point. Sorry for wasting
your time.
I've installed cygwin under WXP in a domain. When I first started bash I
got a warning about groups but it said that I could safely
Igor:
Thanks, including "smbntsec" in the CYGWIN environment variable solved
my problem.
Derek
-Original Message-
From: Igor Pechtchanski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: October 3, 2003 1:15 PM
To: Derek Mahar
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: chmod not working on Windows
htchanski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: October 3, 2003 12:31 PM
> To: Derek Mahar
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: chmod not working on Windows XP
>
>
> On Fri, 3 Oct 2003, Derek Mahar wrote:
>
> > After having read the FAQ and setting CYGWIN to "ntsec
file on /cygdrive/c had
the intended result.
Derek
-Original Message-
From: Igor Pechtchanski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: October 3, 2003 12:31 PM
To: Derek Mahar
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: chmod not working on Windows XP
On Fri, 3 Oct 2003, Derek Mahar wrote:
> Af
On Fri, 3 Oct 2003, Derek Mahar wrote:
> After having read the FAQ and setting CYGWIN to "ntsec tty", chmod still
> does not change file permissions on my Windows XP system. I've created
> /etc/passwd and /etc/group as follows:
>
> mkpasswd --local --domain > /etc/passwd
> mkgroup --local --domai
After having read the FAQ and setting CYGWIN to "ntsec tty", chmod still
does not change file permissions on my Windows XP system. I've created
/etc/passwd and /etc/group as follows:
mkpasswd --local --domain > /etc/passwd
mkgroup --local --domain > /etc/group
My system configuration is:
Micros
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Jason Tishler wrote:
> > Yeh, I feel pretty silly about saying the problem is chmod not working
> > with Win98, but I never wanted authentication, so I'm OK as I am.
> ^
> Given the above, why did you
environment to do so myself.
>
> Yeh, I feel pretty silly about saying the problem is chmod not working
> with Win98, but I never wanted authentication, so I'm OK as I am.
^
Given the above, why did you have "auth ssh" in your ~/.fe
in.edu.tw
> > fetchmail: Query status=4 (PROTOCOL)
> > I can ssh into the shell account on the server.
> The above is a very different from what you originally posted. Sorry,
> but you will have to debug this yourself because I do not have the
> necessary environment to do so myself
Greg,
On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 10:48:12PM +0800, Greg Matheson wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Mar 2003, Jason Tishler wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 09:34:36AM -0500, Jason Tishler wrote:
> > > On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 10:18:29PM +0800, Greg Matheson wrote:
> > > > When I installed fetchmail-6.2.2.1, fetch
On Tue, 11 Mar 2003, Jason Tishler wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 09:34:36AM -0500, Jason Tishler wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 10:18:29PM +0800, Greg Matheson wrote:
> > > When I installed fetchmail-6.2.2.1, fetchmail started refusing to
> > > use my .fetchmailrc. I think the requirement t
On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 09:34:36AM -0500, Jason Tishler wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 10:18:29PM +0800, Greg Matheson wrote:
> > When I installed fetchmail-6.2.2.1, fetchmail started refusing to
> > use my .fetchmailrc. I think the requirement that permissions be
> > 600 on it is new.
>
> No, I
Greg,
On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 10:18:29PM +0800, Greg Matheson wrote:
> When I installed fetchmail-6.2.2.1, fetchmail started refusing to
> use my .fetchmailrc. I think the requirement that permissions be
> 600 on it is new.
No, I've been patching fetchmail to skip this permissions check due to
th
On Saturday 8 Mar 03, Greg Matheson writes:
> When I installed fetchmail-6.2.2.1, fetchmail started refusing to
> use my .fetchmailrc. I think the requirement that permissions be
> 600 on it is new.
>
> However when I tried chmodding it to 600, it stays at 644
This is in the FAQ.
David
--
Unsu
When I installed fetchmail-6.2.2.1, fetchmail started refusing to
use my .fetchmailrc. I think the requirement that permissions be
600 on it is new.
However when I tried chmodding it to 600, it stays at 644
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~
$ ls -al .fetchmailrc
-rw-r--r--1 greg unknown 864 Feb 1
27 matches
Mail list logo
