Re: check_case:strict Useful

2004-02-25 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 08:13:18AM -0800, Peter J. Stieber wrote: >CFG> This falls under the classification of "really need it and >CFG> really know what you're doing". > >I'll consider that the ultimate compliment ;-) @#&*( Did I just say something non-mean? I must be slipping. cgf -- Unsubsc

Re: check_case:strict Useful

2004-02-25 Thread Peter J. Stieber
CFG> This falls under the classification of "really need it and CFG> really know what you're doing". I'll consider that the ultimate compliment ;-) Pete -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation:

Re: check_case:strict Useful

2004-02-25 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 07:51:27AM -0800, Peter J. Stieber wrote: >In a different thread CFG wrote: > >CFG> I keep pointing out that there few reasons to use the >CFG> check_case:strict option. Even the person who wrote >CFG> it (Corinna) agrees. It slows down cygwin's file handling. >CFG> You sh

check_case:strict Useful

2004-02-25 Thread Peter J. Stieber
In a different thread CFG wrote: CFG> I keep pointing out that there few reasons to use the CFG> check_case:strict option. Even the person who wrote CFG> it (Corinna) agrees. It slows down cygwin's file handling. CFG> You should only be using this option if you really need it CFG> and really kno