On Mar 7 06:02, Eric Blake wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> According to Lemke, Michael SZ/HZA-ZIOM1 on 3/7/2008 2:22 AM:
> |>> Do you agree?
> |> I should add that I'm still rather leaning towards the Linux
> | behaviour.
> |> I tested this on Solaris 10, and it behave
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Lemke, Michael SZ/HZA-ZIOM1 on 3/7/2008 2:22 AM:
|>> Do you agree?
|> I should add that I'm still rather leaning towards the Linux
| behaviour.
|> I tested this on Solaris 10, and it behaves again different. In both
|> examples open(2) r
On Thu, 6 Mar 2008 16:32:52 +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Mar 6 16:27, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > On Mar 6 14:56, Eric Blake wrote:
> > > Corinna Vinschen cygwin.com> writes:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > But the flags are not O_RDONLY|O_CREAT. They are
O_WRONLY|O_CREAT.
> > >
> > > I still t
On Mar 6 16:27, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Mar 6 14:56, Eric Blake wrote:
> > Corinna Vinschen cygwin.com> writes:
> >
> > >
> > > But the flags are not O_RDONLY|O_CREAT. They are O_WRONLY|O_CREAT.
> >
> > I still think Linux is wrong - t/ is not an existing directory, so you
> > can't
>
On Mar 6 14:56, Eric Blake wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen cygwin.com> writes:
>
> >
> > But the flags are not O_RDONLY|O_CREAT. They are O_WRONLY|O_CREAT.
>
> I still think Linux is wrong - t/ is not an existing directory, so you can't
> claim that an attempt was made to open an existing director
Corinna Vinschen cygwin.com> writes:
>
> But the flags are not O_RDONLY|O_CREAT. They are O_WRONLY|O_CREAT.
I still think Linux is wrong - t/ is not an existing directory, so you can't
claim that an attempt was made to open an existing directory with O_WRONLY.
But I guess it is a bit ambigu
On Mar 6 07:02, Eric Blake wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> According to Corinna Vinschen on 3/6/2008 6:45 AM:
> | SUSv3(*) says:
> |
> | [EISDIR]
> | The named file is a directory and oflag includes O_WRONLY or O_RDWR.
> | [ENOENT]
> | O_CREAT is not set an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Corinna Vinschen on 3/6/2008 6:45 AM:
| SUSv3(*) says:
|
| [EISDIR]
| The named file is a directory and oflag includes O_WRONLY or O_RDWR.
| [ENOENT]
| O_CREAT is not set and the named file does not exist; or O_CREAT is
|
On Mar 6 06:32, Eric Blake wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> According to Corinna Vinschen on 3/6/2008 6:27 AM:
> |
> | I examined this situation on Linux. In Linux, touch tries to open t\
> | and open() returns EISDIR. The fact that you see an ENOENT is a result
> | o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Corinna Vinschen on 3/6/2008 6:27 AM:
|
| I examined this situation on Linux. In Linux, touch tries to open t\
| and open() returns EISDIR. The fact that you see an ENOENT is a result
| of touch trying to use other methods to set the ti
On Mar 6 06:14, Eric Blake wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> According to Corinna Vinschen on 3/5/2008 11:36 AM:
> |> $ : > t/
> |> t/: Is a directory.
> |>
> |
> | Should be fixed in the new 1.5.25-11 test release.
>
> Yes, in 1.5.25-11, it is _correctly_ failing with E
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Corinna Vinschen on 3/5/2008 11:36 AM:
|> $ : > t/
|> t/: Is a directory.
|>
|
| Should be fixed in the new 1.5.25-11 test release.
Yes, in 1.5.25-11, it is _correctly_ failing with ENOENT. But in CVS, it
looks like you changed it to re
On Mar 4 21:47, Eric Blake wrote:
> According to POSIX (and as implemented on Linux):
>
> $ rm -Rf t
> $ touch t/
> touch: setting times of `t/': No such file or directory
> $ : > t/
> t/: Is a directory.
>
>
> The ENOENT failure is correct, since you are using the syntax to open (or
> create)
According to POSIX (and as implemented on Linux):
$ rm -Rf t
$ touch t/
touch: setting times of `t/': No such file or directory
$ : > t/
t/: Is a directory.
The ENOENT failure is correct, since you are using the syntax to open (or
create) a directory but are not going through mkdir. However, o
14 matches
Mail list logo
