Greetings, Ryan Johnson!
>>>I always used to use du with the -cxhs options, but since updating to the
>>> latest (8.15-1) version there appears to be a problem caused by -x:
$ ls -la
total 392188
drwxr-xr-x+ 1 DKAdmin None 0 Apr 6 00:35 .
drwxr-xr-x+ 1 DKAdmin None
On 06/04/2013 7:48 AM, Andrey Repin wrote:
Greetings, Dave Korn!
Hi list,
I always used to use du with the -cxhs options, but since updating to the
latest (8.15-1) version there appears to be a problem caused by -x:
$ ls -la
total 392188
drwxr-xr-x+ 1 DKAdmin None 0 Apr 6 00:
Greetings, Dave Korn!
> Hi list,
> I always used to use du with the -cxhs options, but since updating to the
> latest (8.15-1) version there appears to be a problem caused by -x:
>> $ ls -la
>> total 392188
>> drwxr-xr-x+ 1 DKAdmin None 0 Apr 6 00:35 .
>> drwxr-xr-x+ 1 DKAdmin No
Hi list,
I always used to use du with the -cxhs options, but since updating to the
latest (8.15-1) version there appears to be a problem caused by -x:
> $ ls -la
> total 392188
> drwxr-xr-x+ 1 DKAdmin None 0 Apr 6 00:35 .
> drwxr-xr-x+ 1 DKAdmin None 0 Apr 3 05:58 ..
> dr
Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> One possible fix is revisiting line 377 in src/du.c in CVS, which
> currently skips hard links only if a file has multiple links.
Sorry, I don't quite follow this. Don't all the directories in
question have multiple links? Or, if you're talking about wal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Reini Urban reported a du bug on the cygwin list - using mount points (or
directory hard links on systems that support that) confuses the default
behavior, and files are being double-counted and inflating the actual disk
space in usage. In the example
6 matches
Mail list logo
