Re: bug#14569: 24.3.50; bootstrap fails on Cygwin

2013-06-16 Thread Ken Brown
On 6/16/2013 11:01 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote: On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 09:11:21AM -0400, Ken Brown wrote: [Adding the bug address back to the CC so that this gets archived.] On 6/15/2013 9:54 AM, Angelo Graziosi wrote: Christopher Faylor wrote On 06/14/2013 11:03 AM, Christopher Faylor wr

Re: bug#14569: 24.3.50; bootstrap fails on Cygwin

2013-06-16 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 09:11:21AM -0400, Ken Brown wrote: >[Adding the bug address back to the CC so that this gets archived.] > >On 6/15/2013 9:54 AM, Angelo Graziosi wrote: >> Christopher Faylor wrote On 06/14/2013 11:03 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote: > You pointed to an archived mail me

Re: bug#14569: 24.3.50; bootstrap fails on Cygwin

2013-06-16 Thread Ken Brown
[Adding the bug address back to the CC so that this gets archived.] On 6/15/2013 9:54 AM, Angelo Graziosi wrote: Christopher Faylor wrote On 06/14/2013 11:03 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote: You pointed to an archived mail messages which implies that was fixed more than a year ago. What makes yo

Re: bug#14569: 24.3.50; bootstrap fails on Cygwin

2013-06-15 Thread Angelo Graziosi
Christopher Faylor wrote On 06/14/2013 11:03 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote: You pointed to an archived mail messages which implies that was fixed more than a year ago. What makes you think it is still a problem? The message I pointed to says

Re: bug#14569: 24.3.50; bootstrap fails on Cygwin

2013-06-14 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 11:01:54PM -0700, Paul Eggert wrote: >On 06/14/2013 11:03 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>You pointed to an archived mail messages which implies that was fixed >>more than a year ago. What makes you think it is still a problem? > >The message I pointed to >

Re: bug#14569: 24.3.50; bootstrap fails on Cygwin

2013-06-14 Thread Paul Eggert
On 06/14/2013 11:03 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote: > You pointed to an archived mail messages which implies that was fixed > more than a year ago. What makes you think it is still a problem? The message I pointed to says this: > Testcase sign

Re: bug#14569: 24.3.50; bootstrap fails on Cygwin

2013-06-14 Thread Ken Brown
On 6/14/2013 2:03 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote: On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 10:45:47AM -0700, Paul Eggert wrote: Cygwin developers, I'm worried about a Cygwin bug where pthread_kill may not send a signal to the correct thread. This bug may be causing Emacs to crash. The Cygwin bug is discussed in t

Re: bug#14569: 24.3.50; bootstrap fails on Cygwin

2013-06-14 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 10:45:47 -0700 > From: Paul Eggert > Cc: 14...@debbugs.gnu.org > > Cygwin developers, I'm worried about a Cygwin bug where > pthread_kill may not send a signal to the correct thread. > This bug may be causing Emacs to crash. The Cygwin bug is > discussed in this thread:

Re: bug#14569: 24.3.50; bootstrap fails on Cygwin

2013-06-14 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 10:45:47AM -0700, Paul Eggert wrote: >Cygwin developers, I'm worried about a Cygwin bug where >pthread_kill may not send a signal to the correct thread. >This bug may be causing Emacs to crash. The Cygwin bug is >discussed in this thread: > >http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2012

Re: bug#14569: 24.3.50; bootstrap fails on Cygwin

2013-06-14 Thread Paul Eggert
Cygwin developers, I'm worried about a Cygwin bug where pthread_kill may not send a signal to the correct thread. This bug may be causing Emacs to crash. The Cygwin bug is discussed in this thread: http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2012-05/msg00472.html Emacs uses pthread_kill to redirect SIGCHLD to t