Re: binutils feature request: ld --disable-large-address-aware [PATCH]

2013-08-22 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Aug 22 18:08, Christian Franke wrote: > Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >... > >Nevertheless, the binutils ML is the right place to send patches > >and discuss these things. You should send your patch their. > > Done: > > http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2013-08/msg00184.html Thanks! Corinna -

Re: binutils feature request: ld --disable-large-address-aware [PATCH]

2013-08-22 Thread Christian Franke
Corinna Vinschen wrote: ... Nevertheless, the binutils ML is the right place to send patches and discuss these things. You should send your patch their. Done: http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2013-08/msg00184.html Christian -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ:

Re: binutils feature request: ld --disable-large-address-aware [PATCH]

2013-08-19 Thread Corinna Vinschen
Hi Christian, On Aug 17 18:36, Christian Franke wrote: > Christian Franke wrote: > >A few programs are not compatible with --large-address-aware which > >is enabled by default in current x86 ld. For example cdrkit, > >dvd+rw-tools and smartmontools use IOCTL_SCSI_PASS_THROUGH_DIRECT > >which appar

Re: binutils feature request: ld --disable-large-address-aware [PATCH]

2013-08-17 Thread Christian Franke
Christian Franke wrote: A few programs are not compatible with --large-address-aware which is enabled by default in current x86 ld. For example cdrkit, dvd+rw-tools and smartmontools use IOCTL_SCSI_PASS_THROUGH_DIRECT which apparently requires user buffers below 2GiB. Using "LDFLAGS=-Wl,--dis