The slowdown appears to be a problem with WinME, but I'll keep digging.
From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
To: Stan Tsu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: basename(1) defect
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 22:
Stan Tsu wrote:
Thanks. The echo works. I haven't verified whether the latest basename(1)
behaves in the same way because I've run across a bigger problem.
Has anyone seem severe performance degradation running Cygwin on
WinME systems? I've seen my system just get slower and slower over
the pa
thoughts? Help!
Stan
From: "Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
CC: "Stan Tsu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: basename(1) defect
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 08:33:50 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> This is a bug with basename 5.3.0
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> This is a bug with basename 5.3.0 found in the latest Cygwin
>>> 1.5.15.1.
>
> Not a bug.
>
>>
>> 1.5.15 was three releases ago, it's most certainly not the latest.
>> But that's not really relevant to your question, I don't think.
>>
>>> $ basename NA A
>>> N
>>>
> > This is a bug with basename 5.3.0 found in the latest Cygwin 1.5.15.1.
Not a bug.
>
> 1.5.15 was three releases ago, it's most certainly not the latest. But
> that's not really relevant to your question, I don't think.
>
> > $ basename NA A
> > N
> > $ basename N/A A
> > A
Stan Tsu wrote:
> This is a bug with basename 5.3.0 found in the latest Cygwin 1.5.15.1.
1.5.15 was three releases ago, it's most certainly not the latest. But
that's not really relevant to your question, I don't think.
> $ basename NA A
> N
> $ basename N/A A
> A <===
This is a bug with basename 5.3.0 found in the latest Cygwin 1.5.15.1.
This used to work with basename in the March 2003 version. Sorry I
don't know the version number any more because the update removed
the old version.
$ FCF=N/A
$ echo $FCF
N/A
$ Z=${FCF:(-1)}
$ echo $Z
A
$ FCG=`basename $FCF
7 matches
Mail list logo
