> You made it harder than necessary to debug your problem.
>
> If you had created a very small test case which demonstrated the issue
> with clear instructions for building it, then this back and forth
> wouldn't be necessary.
>
> Actually, even that would likely not have been necessary if you had
On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 06:06:59PM +0900, KIMURA Masaru wrote:
>2014/1/8 Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 11:35:57AM +0900, KIMURA Masaru wrote:
>>>fopen() stackdump file immediately after cygwin_stackdump() calling in
>>>signle process fails.
>>>is this intentional?
>>>https://
2014/1/8 Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 11:35:57AM +0900, KIMURA Masaru wrote:
>>fopen() stackdump file immediately after cygwin_stackdump() calling in
>>signle process fails.
>>is this intentional?
>>https://github.com/hiyuh/cygwin-stackdump-example
>
> I rewrote your example
On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 11:35:57AM +0900, KIMURA Masaru wrote:
>fopen() stackdump file immediately after cygwin_stackdump() calling in
>signle process fails.
>is this intentional?
>https://github.com/hiyuh/cygwin-stackdump-example
I rewrote your example slightly to make it work with any executable
Hi,
fopen() stackdump file immediately after cygwin_stackdump() calling in
signle process fails.
is this intentional?
https://github.com/hiyuh/cygwin-stackdump-example
Peace,
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:
5 matches
Mail list logo