Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Windows 2003 Compatibility

At 10:41 AM 6/23/2004, you wrote: >> You >> could send the strace file along to the list if it's not too big >> but unless it's clear where there's a problem just by looking at >> it, I certainly won't be able to help that much. I don't have W2K3 >> Server (or any Server) so I can't really deb

Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Windows 2003 Compatibility

> You > could send the strace file along to the list if it's not too big > but unless it's clear where there's a problem just by looking at > it, I certainly won't be able to help that much. I don't have W2K3 > Server (or any Server) so I can't really debug this. Did you try > Mark Bohlman's

Re: Antwort: Re: Windows 2003 Compatibility

At 10:12 AM 6/23/2004, you wrote: >> You might be right. The key is for someone seeing the problem to look >> into it or at least to provide some detailed information of the problem. >> I recommend looking at as a starting >> point for anyone interested in pur

Antwort: Re: Windows 2003 Compatibility

> You might be right. The key is for someone seeing the problem to look > into it or at least to provide some detailed information of the problem. > I recommend looking at as a starting > point for anyone interested in pursuing this. I did. Look at the thread

Re: Windows 2003 Compatibility

At 04:24 AM 6/23/2004, you wrote: >>Issues using some Cygwin packages with W2K3 generally are related to >>security changes in W2K3 (i.e. the SYSTEM user has less permissions). >>This is typically only a problem for packages that run as services and >>need to switch user contexts (from SYSTEM t

Re: Windows 2003 Compatibility

>Issues using some Cygwin packages with W2K3 generally are related to >security changes in W2K3 (i.e. the SYSTEM user has less permissions). >This is typically only a problem for packages that run as services and >need to switch user contexts (from SYSTEM to some user). Packages "caught" >by t

Re: Windows 2003 Compatibility

At 12:24 PM 6/22/2004, you wrote: >* Jerry Whitaker (2004-06-22 17:41 +0200) >> Which version is supported under Windows 2003 Server? > >This is a FAQ... > >,--- * http://cygwin.com/faq/faq_1.html#SEC2 >| Wait a minute... Cygwin is only supported if you are paying for it, >| such as through a

Re: Windows 2003 Compatibility

* Jerry Whitaker (2004-06-22 17:41 +0200) > Hello. We are using Cygwin here at Publix Super Markets and are in the > process of upgrading our servers to Windows 2003 Server. > > Which version of the product is certified for Windows 2003 Server? Non. *chuckle* > Which version is supported under

Re: Windows 2003 Compatibility

At 11:41 AM 6/22/2004, you wrote: >Hello. We are using Cygwin here at Publix Super Markets and are in the >process of upgrading our servers to Windows 2003 Server. > >Which version of the product is certified for Windows 2003 Server? Which >version is supported under Windows 2003 Server? Are ther

Windows 2003 Compatibility

Hello. We are using Cygwin here at Publix Super Markets and are in the process of upgrading our servers to Windows 2003 Server. Which version of the product is certified for Windows 2003 Server? Which version is supported under Windows 2003 Server? Are there any issues with doing an in-place upg