RE: Updated: inetutils-1.3.2-29

2005-04-20 Thread Dave Korn
Original Message >From: Christopher Faylor >Sent: 20 April 2005 16:37 > On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 04:27:00PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote: >> Original Message >>> From: Christopher Faylor >>> Sent: 20 April 2005 15:37 >> >>> On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 03:19:32PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:

Re: Updated: inetutils-1.3.2-29

2005-04-20 Thread Brian Dessent
Christopher Faylor wrote: > Well, I'm glad I could clear up your apparent misconception then. I have to admit I'm guilty here of this as well. I've got a couple of patches for setup.exe ready for "thoughtful consideration" but I was waiting on the assignment to be processed before going ahead.

Re: Updated: inetutils-1.3.2-29

2005-04-20 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 04:27:00PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote: >Original Message >>From: Christopher Faylor >>Sent: 20 April 2005 15:37 > >> On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 03:19:32PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote: >>> I was planning to look into that for my next patch, as it happens! >> >> So were *you* und

RE: Updated: inetutils-1.3.2-29

2005-04-20 Thread Dave Korn
Original Message >From: Christopher Faylor >Sent: 20 April 2005 15:37 > On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 03:19:32PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote: >> I was planning to look into that for my next patch, as it happens! > > So were *you* under the impression that you needed a cygwin copyright > assignment t

Re: Updated: inetutils-1.3.2-29

2005-04-20 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 03:19:32PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote: >I was planning to look into that for my next patch, as it happens! So were *you* under the impression that you needed a cygwin copyright assignment to modify setup.exe? That's not the case, if so. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://c

RE: Updated: inetutils-1.3.2-29

2005-04-20 Thread Dave Korn
Original Message >From: Christopher Faylor >Sent: 20 April 2005 00:41 > On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 09:32:00AM +1000, Luke Kendall wrote: >> On 19 Apr, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >>> - When updating inetutils, take care that syslogd.exe, inetd.exe and >>>subsequent processes don't run anymor

Re: Updated: inetutils-1.3.2-29

2005-04-19 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 09:32:00AM +1000, Luke Kendall wrote: >On 19 Apr, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >> - When updating inetutils, take care that syslogd.exe, inetd.exe and >>subsequent processes don't run anymore. Otherwise the update will >>fail. > >Does setup.exe take care of stopping

Re: Updated: inetutils-1.3.2-29

2005-04-19 Thread Luke Kendall
On 19 Apr, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > - When updating inetutils, take care that syslogd.exe, inetd.exe and >subsequent processes don't run anymore. Otherwise the update will >fail. Does setup.exe take care of stopping them before updating them, or do you mean that topping them must be

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: inetutils-1.3.2-29

2005-04-19 Thread Corinna Vinschen
I've updated the version of inetutils to 1.3.2-29. Changes in 1.3.2-29: - "The return of syslogd" release. Beginning with version 1.5.15, Cygwin started to support syslogging to syslogd. To install syslogd, run the new syslogd-config script which creates the necessary files to run syslogd