If I have "analyzed" things correctly lately;
most of the GPL violations are done in this situation:
1) Person "P" writes/ports some nice software using cygwin.
2) P picks out required parts of cygwin runtime objects
and builds a package that is fast and easy to install.
3) P puts the pac
I've talked to Red Hat's lawyers.
1) The interpretation that just providing a link to the sources is
adequate is incorrect so we are correct in advising people that they
need to provide sources for the binaries that they provide.
This is so much of a "well, duh" that I felt embarrassed asking the
2 matches
Mail list logo
