Re: To boost maintainer

2009-07-01 Thread Václav Haisman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Eray Ozkural wrote, On 1.7.2009 21:50: >[diatribe removed] In your previous Boost thread, subject "More info on boost and gcc-4", you have missed one fine point. You have to build the whole Boost with - --enable-auto-import, not just your own executa

Re: To boost maintainer

2009-07-01 Thread Tim Prince
Reini Urban wrote: 2009/7/1 Eray Ozkural : xemacs is also broken I bet it's the same dynamic linking error. I recompile the testing xemacs package (xemacs-21.5-b28) frequently with gcc-4 cygwin-1.7 and it works fine. And I'm satisfied with how gfortran works if I remove the offendin

Re: To boost maintainer

2009-07-01 Thread Reini Urban
2009/7/1 Eray Ozkural : > xemacs is also broken I bet it's the same dynamic linking error. I recompile the testing xemacs package (xemacs-21.5-b28) frequently with gcc-4 cygwin-1.7 and it works fine. -- Reini -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http:/

Re: To boost maintainer

2009-07-01 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 10:50:28PM +0300, Eray Ozkural wrote: >No, you have not done adequate testing obviously. And you have not adequately understood how to use email. Starting a new accusatory thread, expecting people to remember you and your important assertions, without any references to pa

Re: To boost maintainer

2009-07-01 Thread Larry Hall (Cygwin)
Karl M wrote: Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 22:50:28 +0300 Subject: To boost maintainer From: Eray Ozkural No, you have not done adequate testing obviously. Hi... You seem like a friendly, helpful and cooperative person; perhaps you should consider volunteering to maintain the Boost package for

Re: To boost maintainer

2009-07-01 Thread Andrew Schulman
> No, you have not done adequate testing obviously. > > I know what I'm doing and I tested 1.39 and it DOES NOT WORK with > cygwin gcc-4, you have to compile gcc yourself if you want it to work. > > Stop giving wrong information to people, you are wasting others' time. > I see that you've said e

RE: To boost maintainer

2009-07-01 Thread Karl M
> Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 22:50:28 +0300 > Subject: To boost maintainer > From: Eray Ozkural > > No, you have not done adequate testing obviously. > > I know what I'm doing and I tested 1.39 and it DOES NOT WORK with > cygwin gcc-4, you have to compile gcc yourself if

To boost maintainer

2009-07-01 Thread Eray Ozkural
No, you have not done adequate testing obviously. I know what I'm doing and I tested 1.39 and it DOES NOT WORK with cygwin gcc-4, you have to compile gcc yourself if you want it to work. Stop giving wrong information to people, you are wasting others' time. I see that you've said exactly the sam