On Wed, 2015-04-15 at 14:22 -0600, Warren Young wrote:
> On Apr 11, 2015, at 4:35 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > The version number is 2.0.0-0.1. Yes, we're going full Torvalds
> > with the release numbers and bump them to 2.0.
>
> Will this result in a cygwin2.dll with a different ABI?
No, ABI
On Apr 11, 2015, at 4:35 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>
> The version number is 2.0.0-0.1. Yes, we're going full Torvalds
> with the release numbers and bump them to 2.0.
Will this result in a cygwin2.dll with a different ABI?
Now’s your chance. :)
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/pr
On Apr 12 16:15, Adam Dinwoodie wrote:
> On 11/04/2015 11:35, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >The version number is 2.0.0-0.1. Yes, we're going full Torvalds with
> > the release numbers and bump them to 2.0. In future, bugfix releases
> > will bump the last number, new feature releases will bump the
On 11/04/2015 11:35, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
The version number is 2.0.0-0.1. Yes, we're going full Torvalds with
> the release numbers and bump them to 2.0. In future, bugfix releases
> will bump the last number, new feature releases will bump the middle
> number.
>
> Bugfix? 2.0.1, 2.0.2,
> It's what we haxxers call "a bug". I made a typo in another function,
> copy-pasted the code over to the chmod function, fixed it in the
> original function and then forgot to fix it in chmod.
[snip]
> I just uploaded a new test release 2.0.0-0.2. It's supposed to fix
> this bug. Give it a b
Houder writes:
> :-) ... I understand ... my problem is, that I am usually NOT subscribed
> to the (any) list, and that I process all my e-mail using webmail, and as
> far as I aware of, it does not provide the "In-Reply-To" feature.
You can post via Gmane rather than the webmailer.
Regards,
Ach
>> Reference: https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2015-04/msg00201.html
>> - [ANNOUNCEMENT] TEST RELEASE: Cygwin 2.0.0-1
>
> I really appreciate bug reports, but, please, try to keep the threading
> intact. Please reply to mails rather than creating new threads which
> h
Hi Henri,
On Apr 11 15:25, Houder wrote:
> Hi Corinna,
>
> Reference: https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2015-04/msg00201.html
> - [ANNOUNCEMENT] TEST RELEASE: Cygwin 2.0.0-1
I really appreciate bug reports, but, please, try to keep the threading
intact. Please reply to mails rather t
Hi Cygwin friends and users,
as outlined in https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2015-04/msg00171.html I've
now created a TEST release of Cygwin which can be installed via
setup-x86{_64}.exe.
The version number is 2.0.0-0.1. Yes, we're going full Torvalds
with the release numbers and bump them to 2.0.
9 matches
Mail list logo
