Hi Corinna,
On Thu, 2020-08-20 at 14:50 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> No, it won't work as expected, as you can see from the discussion in
>
> this thread. Some internal work would be required.
OK. So even with no file actions and spawn atributes, it still would
break things.
What kind of t
On Aug 20 07:40, Peter Dons Tychsen via Cygwin wrote:
> Hi Corinna,
>
> > spawn alone doesn't cut it, due to the requirement to support the
> > additional file actions and spawn atributes POSIX defines. This
> > would require a revamp of Cygwin's spawn functionality, which is
> > already quite co
Hi Corinna,
> spawn alone doesn't cut it, due to the requirement to support the
> additional file actions and spawn atributes POSIX defines. This
> would require a revamp of Cygwin's spawn functionality, which is
> already quite complicated. So this is something I'm only willing
> to do in homeo
On Aug 3 11:10, Peter Dons Tychsen via Cygwin wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Fri, 2020-07-31 at 10:10 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > Oh well. I did a quick test with your new testcase (thanks for
> > that!)
> > and it seems to be a bit more complicated than I anticipated
> > yesterday.
> > The pare
Hi all,
On Fri, 2020-07-31 at 10:10 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> Oh well. I did a quick test with your new testcase (thanks for
> that!)
> and it seems to be a bit more complicated than I anticipated
> yesterday.
> The parent-child relationship between the processes is broken. I
> have
> to
On Jul 30 19:04, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
> Hi Corinna,
>
> On 7/30/2020 1:17 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > Hi Ken,
> >
> > On Jul 30 13:59, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > > On Jul 29 19:12, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
> > > > On 7/29/2020 4:17 PM, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
> > > > > posix_sp
Hi Corinna,
On 7/30/2020 1:17 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Hi Ken,
On Jul 30 13:59, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Jul 29 19:12, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
On 7/29/2020 4:17 PM, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
posix_spawn(p) returns before the spawned process is fully up and
running. [...]
I just
Hi Ken,
On Jul 30 13:59, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Jul 29 19:12, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
> > On 7/29/2020 4:17 PM, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
> > > posix_spawn(p) returns before the spawned process is fully up and
> > > running. [...]
> > I just took a look at the source, and I see that p
On Jul 29 19:12, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
> On 7/29/2020 4:17 PM, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
> > posix_spawn(p) returns before the spawned process is fully up and
> > running. [...]
> I just took a look at the source, and I see that posix_spawn was taken from
> FreeBSD. Does FreeBSD have the
On 7/29/2020 4:17 PM, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
posix_spawn(p) returns before the spawned process is fully up and running. As a
result, the spawned process can fail to receive signals. The attached test case
illustrates the problem. It spawns a sleep process and then tries to kill it.
On e
posix_spawn(p) returns before the spawned process is fully up and running. As a
result, the spawned process can fail to receive signals. The attached test case
illustrates the problem. It spawns a sleep process and then tries to kill it.
On exit, the sleep process is still running.
The foll
11 matches
Mail list logo
