On Tue, 4 Apr 2006, Igor Peshansky wrote:
> Earlier, I wrote (regarding firing off the build once some number of files
> have changed):
>
> > FWIW, a slightly better way of structuring your make is to remember the
> > date/time of the last make (as a timestamp on a file, perhaps), and
> > simply c
Earlier, I wrote (regarding firing off the build once some number of files
have changed):
> FWIW, a slightly better way of structuring your make is to remember the
> date/time of the last make (as a timestamp on a file, perhaps), and
> simply compare CVS as of that date/time with the HEAD. If the
Thanks for that. I'd not thought of using the CVS itself.
Living and learning.
On Tue, 4 Apr 2006, Richard Quadling wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I have a document building process which gets its data from a CVS and
> then autoconf/configure/make...
>
> The CVS command I'm using produces 2 log files. The first (cvs1.log)
> contains all the directory names. The second (cvs2.log) contains
Hi.
I have a document building process which gets its data from a CVS and
then autoconf/configure/make...
The CVS command I'm using produces 2 log files. The first (cvs1.log)
contains all the directory names. The second (cvs2.log) contains the
actual changes to the local files.
What I want to do
5 matches
Mail list logo