On 22/09/2021 02:50, Richard Beels via Cygwin wrote:
At 9/21/2021 at 12:28, Shakespearean monkeys danced on Jason Pyeron's
keyboard and said:
If the last execution of the setup used download only and the setup is
used with -q and without either -D or -L it still defaults to -D
Adding -Y does
At 9/21/2021 at 12:28, Shakespearean monkeys danced on Jason Pyeron's
keyboard and said:
If the last execution of the setup used download only and the setup
is used with -q and without either -D or -L it still defaults to -D
Adding -Y does not change the behavior either.
Workaround was to l
If the last execution of the setup used download only and the setup is used
with -q and without either -D or -L it still defaults to -D
Adding -Y does not change the behavior either.
Workaround was to launch setup, advance to “select download source”, select
install, advance to next scree
or package maintainer?"
- Is there a simple way from command line
to get the version number od setup_x86.exe,
like -V or -version?
In setup.log there is a version number, but
I want to avoid the GUI.
No.
A patch to add such an option would be useful.
- The setup version sh
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 12:15:21PM -0800, Collin Monahan wrote:
>I tried to upgrade to the 1.7.1-1 version on Windows 7 Home 64bit. Toward the
>end of the process I had to click through several modal dialogs which say:
>
>The procedure entry point stpcpy could not be located in the dynamic link
>
I tried to upgrade to the 1.7.1-1 version on Windows 7 Home 64bit. Toward the
end of the process I had to click through several modal dialogs which say:
The procedure entry point stpcpy could not be located in the dynamic link
library cygwin1.dll.
Although I'm not too familiar with the way Cygw
On 10/27/2009 06:18 PM, Jason Schamp wrote:
If I launch from the command line WITHOUT the -q switch, it requires me
to hit enter a few times, but doesn't go into this infinite loop. Any
ideas?
I was going to recommend trying a different mirror before you mentioned
about the '-q' switch. Maybe
Hi. I'm new, first post, and getting to know Cygwin for SSH. I'm using a
vbscript to install Cygwin on several servers. The script's executes
this line, which launches setup.exe successfully:
setup.exe -d -q -R C:\Cygwin -L "C:\documents and
settings\schamji\desktop\new-cygwin installation v2.
Dave Korn wrote:
Here's my key.
[...] but you'll find it's been used to sign that signing key,
i.e., after creating an .asc file from it and imported (gpg --import <
asc_file), is it possible to verify pubring.asc? If Yes, How?
(pubring.asc hasn't a .sig file!)
...the forthcoming gcc-4
Lee wrote on 08 August 2008 13:50:
>
> umm. right! The key was included in the announcement msg. dunno
> how I missed it,
Prolly because it was an insanely long post!
cheers,
DaveK
--
Can't think of a witty .sigline today
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/m
On 8/8/08, Dave Korn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Lee wrote on 08 August 2008 05:51:
>
>> It's late, so I'm not going to try to figure out how to import the
>> public key they give the link to. It seems a bit pointless
>> anyway.. if someone is able to change the setup.exe offered for
>> down
Angelo Graziosi wrote on 08 August 2008 13:08:
> gpg: Signature made Tue Aug [...]
> gpg: Good signature from "Cygwin "
> gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
> gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the
> owner.
Here's my key. You have
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
You didn't read`Dave's mail:
The key was in the announcement; run "gpg --import" at the command-line
and cut'n'paste it into stdin (or redirect it from a file).
^^
Dave Korn wrote:
With the pubring.asc, yo
Angelo Graziosi wrote on 08 August 2008 11:31:
> Dave Korn wrote:
>
>> Press Ctrl-D. It's the same as cat or anything else that reads stdin.
>
> $ gpg --import
> gpg: WARNING: using insecure memory!
> gpg: please see http://www.gnupg.org/faq.html for more information
>
> Ctrl-D
>
> gpg: no va
On Aug 8 12:30, Angelo Graziosi wrote:
> Dave Korn wrote:
>
>> Press Ctrl-D. It's the same as cat or anything else that reads stdin.
>
> $ gpg --import
> gpg: WARNING: using insecure memory!
> gpg: please see http://www.gnupg.org/faq.html for more information
>
> Ctrl-D
>
> gpg: no valid OpenPGP
Dave Korn wrote:
Press Ctrl-D. It's the same as cat or anything else that reads stdin.
$ gpg --import
gpg: WARNING: using insecure memory!
gpg: please see http://www.gnupg.org/faq.html for more information
Ctrl-D
gpg: no valid OpenPGP data found.
gpg: Total number processed: 0
With the 'p
Angelo Graziosi wrote on 08 August 2008 10:58:
> Dave Korn wrote:
>
>> The key was in the announcement; run "gpg --import" at the command-line
>> and cut'n'paste it into stdin (or redirect it from a file).
>
> $ gpg --import
> gpg: WARNING: using insecure memory!
> gpg: please see http://www.gnu
Dave Korn wrote:
The key was in the announcement; run "gpg --import" at the command-line
and cut'n'paste it into stdin (or redirect it from a file).
$ gpg --import
gpg: WARNING: using insecure memory!
gpg: please see http://www.gnupg.org/faq.html for more information
I have waited several mi
Lee wrote on 08 August 2008 05:51:
> It's late, so I'm not going to try to figure out how to import the
> public key they give the link to. It seems a bit pointless
> anyway.. if someone is able to change the setup.exe offered for
> downloading I don't see why they couldn't also change the p
Angelo Graziosi wrote on 08 August 2008 01:44:
> gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found
The key was in the announcement; run "gpg --import" at the command-line
and cut'n'paste it into stdin (or redirect it from a file).
cheers,
DaveK
--
Can't think of a witty .sigline tod
On 8/7/08, Angelo Graziosi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dave Korn wrote:
>
>> Also, we're going to add a link to the setup.exe gpg .sig file on the main
>> page; then the simple rule will be "If it has a gpg signature, it's the
>> new
>> version".
>
> The main page now says:
>
> "The signature for
Dave Korn wrote:
Also, we're going to add a link to the setup.exe gpg .sig file on the main
page; then the simple rule will be "If it has a gpg signature, it's the new
version".
The main page now says:
"The signature for setup.exe can be used to verify the validity of this
binary using this
Eric Blake wrote on 05 August 2008 02:29:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> According to Mike Cappella on 8/4/2008 2:33 PM:
>> With the recent CVE security announcement regarding setup.exe:
>>
>>http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2008-3323
>>
>> I'm wondering if per
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Mike Cappella on 8/4/2008 2:33 PM:
| With the recent CVE security announcement regarding setup.exe:
|
|http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2008-3323
|
| I'm wondering if perhaps it make sense to include the version number of
| set
With the recent CVE security announcement regarding setup.exe:
http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2008-3323
I'm wondering if perhaps it make sense to include the version number of
setup.exe on the main Cygwin web page? It is currently seems to require
downloading setup.exe and running it
s?..
Igor
P.S. You might also want to try a newer setup version, or even a snapshot
from <http://cygwin.com/setup/snapshots/>.
--
http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
|\ _,,,---,,_[EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ZZZzz /,`.-'`
I am tasked with installing Cygwin (The latest version) from an install
directory (the computer does not have an internet connection). I run
the setup.exe I select for all users, install from local directory and I
get an error. The screen is at 9% install and the error is at
/archive/mkinstalldir
On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 03:46:28PM +0100, Rene wrote:
>the setup-version line is missing from the setup.ini file (on
>mirrors.rcn.net) so the old setup.exe does not indicate that there is a
>new setup.exe.
Should be fixed now.
cgf
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#un
Hi,
the setup-version line is missing from the setup.ini file
(on mirrors.rcn.net) so the old setup.exe does not indicate
that there is a new setup.exe.
Regards,
Rene
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
At 01:50 PM 1/8/2002, Mark McEahern wrote:
>Hi, when I run setup.exe version 2.125.2.10, many of the packages are set to
>Skip. Is there an easy way to tell setup to download the current version
>(non-experimental) of all packages? It's fairly tedious to have to cycle
>through the options for ea
Hi, when I run setup.exe version 2.125.2.10, many of the packages are set to
Skip. Is there an easy way to tell setup to download the current version
(non-experimental) of all packages? It's fairly tedious to have to cycle
through the options for each package.
Thanks,
// mark
--
Unsubscribe
31 matches
Mail list logo
