On 25 Nov, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I assume you mean you just install Default
> > then run setup a 2nd time, choosing All?
>
> Exactly.
Many thanks, Fergus. Knowing that, I can add it to our Cygwin
automated installation process.
luke
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/m
> I assume you mean you just install Default
> then run setup a 2nd time, choosing All?
Exactly.
Fergus
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:
On 25 Nov, fergus wrote:
> 5. If you try installing in two stages (i - the default Base installation,
> then ii - the rest) then, in my experience anyway, on three machines as
> described above, the whole thing goes through like a dream.
Ah! Thanks, Fergus, I'll give that a try. I assume y
> Is this just a local problem here, do you think?
> Other people are, somehow, still able to install Cygwin these days?
> Any idea how they do it?
I guess posts of the style "Well, I do this" are not very welcome on the
grounds of volume and non- generalisability. But since you ask:
1. I always
On 25 Nov, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >I can report that the problem is slightly improved in the current
> >release of setup,
>
> Er, there hasn't been any release of setup since the original reports.
> The last release was on April 25, 2004.
Sorry, I jumped to a conclusion. I was ins
On Thu, Nov 25, 2004 at 05:07:33PM +1100, Luke Kendall wrote:
>Some weeks ago, I seconded a report that Cygwin wasn't releasing
>handles, causing some machines to thrash to death and the installation
>to fail.
>
>I can report that the problem is slightly improved in the current
>release of setup,
Some weeks ago, I seconded a report that Cygwin wasn't releasing
handles, causing some machines to thrash to death and the installation
to fail.
I can report that the problem is slightly improved in the current
release of setup, but I think there are still some leaks as it is
currently sitting at
7 matches
Mail list logo
