It would not be hard to hack the mailing list software such that any
message that contained "Users List" was held up for moderator
approval.
--
Mike Crawford
Portland Custom Software Development
m...@soggywizards.com
http://soggywizards.com
+1 (971) 386-3996
Soggy Jobs Is Hiring!
Now a
Michael Crawford wrote:
then somehow determine whether that domain is owned by the trademark
holder. I'll send you my bill in the mail.
---
You didn't prove it belongs to the TM holder. In fact, you
did nothing. The important part is proving the domain is owned by
the trademark holder
Look for Reply-To addresses that contain registered trademarks, then
somehow determine whether that domain is owned by the trademark
holder. Reject those mails which do not so belong.
BEHOLD:
reply-to:Harley-Davidson ,
I'll send you my bill in the mail.
Mischa
--
Mike Crawford
Portland Custom
Greetings, Steven Penny!
> On Tue, 5 Jun 2018 20:18:59, Frank Farance wrote:
>> No, I'm not suggesting that one must be subscribed, I'm pointing out that if
>> one wants to have a back and forth discussion (in a practical sense), some
>> kinda registration/subscription system is necessary.
> No,
x27;t subscribers, but the main benefit
would be the lack of spam.
The GNU mailing lists use a mailman instance, and many of them are set
up to use a spam filter front end coupled with a human moderator that
must whitelist ALL first-time posters (whether or not the poster is
subscribed; subscripti
r group as indicated here:
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2018-06/msg00035.html
That sounds like the easiest approach because it anyone can write to the list
and there would be just a short delay for those people who aren't subscribers,
but the main benefit would be the lack of spam.
No. I am not
ers, but the main benefit would be the lack of spam.
I'm not tied to any technology, and I'm happy to have heard some more
discussion, which better informed me about some of the Use Cases I was unaware
of.
So here's my question (and it assumes that there would be volunteer(s) to
m
On Tue, 5 Jun 2018 13:38:14, Erik Soderquist wrote:
I have seen many people (and have done this myself before I
subscribed) participate in the discussion of their specific topic on
the list without subscribing by watching the public archive of the
list for updates to their topics and crafting the
On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 4:13 PM, Frank Farance wrote:
> Third, I believe a registration mechanism (just your E-mail address) is
> necessary for discussion: How would you be getting follow-up messages if
> you're not on the list? And E-mail clients may prefer Reply-To-List rather
> than Reply-All, w
On 6/4/2018 5:54 PM, Duncan Roe wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 04:26:57PM -0400, Jeffrey Altman wrote:
>>
>> My mail servers regularly categorize cygwin at cygwin.com mail as spam.
>>
>> And then there is all of the mail that simply gets rejected because of
>&
On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 04:26:57PM -0400, Jeffrey Altman wrote:
>
> My mail servers regularly categorize cygwin at cygwin.com mail as spam.
>
> And then there is all of the mail that simply gets rejected because of
> DMARC policies applied by the sender's domain.
>
>
>
On 6/4/2018 4:13 PM, Frank Farance wrote:
> Second, as a mailing list admin myself, at some time we're going to have
> to deal with spam as some of the members E-mail systems will start
> tagging normal cygwin stuff as spam, which is the kind of stuff members
> don't have con
> On Jun 4, 2018, at 2:30 PM, Frank Farance wrote:
>
> I've seen a bunch of spam, and it's continued for a while (beyond my
> expectation that it would have already ended).
Fortunately, no one's here to meet your expectations.
If you have issues with the lists, y
self, at some time we're going to have to
deal with spam as some of the members E-mail systems will start tagging normal
cygwin stuff as spam, which is the kind of stuff members don't have control
over in medium-to-large organizations. Again, I've heard all these
*legitimate* co
On 2018-06-04 21:30, Frank Farance wrote:
> Hi, I enjoy reading the cygwin E-mails, one of the few E-mail lists I
> regularly follow. And I've administered multiple E-mail lists over
> two-plus decades.
>
> I've seen a bunch of spam, and it's continued for a while
e of
some kind (spam folder) you can access and update them, while
automated list management often can't and it is either send it through
or delete it, and if deleted, no one ever sees it, making false
positives much more dangerous :)
I've numerous times found valid messages and even
On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 6:59 PM, Norton Allen wrote:
> For what it's worth, I think I have a pretty good spam filter, and these ads
> for mailing lists always seem to get through, so they aren't particularly
> easy to catch.
>
>
Well, if there is a filter set up I didn
For what it's worth, I think I have a pretty good spam filter, and these
ads for mailing lists always seem to get through, so they aren't
particularly easy to catch.
On 5/18/2018 5:03 PM, Erik Soderquist wrote:
On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 4:50 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
There is.
On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 4:50 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> There is. It's not perfect. Depending on how it's tweaked, either we get
> false positives or some spam makes it through. It goes back and forth and
> right now it seems were on the latter side.
Personally, I much
On 2018-05-18 14:44, R0b0t1 wrote:
Ideally everyone would have a filter set up that is capable of binning
the spam automatically. Some may not. Is there any chance of running
something listserv side?
There is. It's not perfect. Depending on how it's tweaked, either we
get false po
Ideally everyone would have a filter set up that is capable of binning
the spam automatically. Some may not. Is there any chance of running
something listserv side?
Cheers,
R0b0t1
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq
PACKAGE DESCRIPTION
===
Homepage:http://www.sourceforge.net/projects/spambayes
License : Python
SpamBayes uses a different set of algorithm to most statistical spam
filters, which enables to dramatically lower the number of legitimate
mail classified as spam, through the
Greetings, Christian Franke!
In theory there should be only one option -l [machine], which prints the
local accounts of the current machine unprefixed (standalone machine) or
prefixed (domain machine), and always prefixed for a foreign machine.
The -L option can just go away.
>
PACKAGE DESCRIPTION
===
Homepage: http://freecode.com/projects/bsfilter
License : GPL
A spam filter which can distinguish spam mail from other mails. It can
read mails by three way: reads from normal file or stdin, retrieves
and stores from IMAP server, reads from POP server and
PACKAGE DESCRIPTION
===
Homepage: http://freecode.com/projects/bsfilter
License : GPL
A spam filter which can distinguish spam mail from other mails. It can
read mails by three way: reads from normal file or stdin, retrieves
and stores from IMAP server, reads from POP server and
PACKAGE DESCRIPTION
===
Homepage: http://sourceforge.net/projects/spamprobe
License : QPL
CHANGES SINCE LAST RELEASE
==
Spamprobe has been obsoleted and will be removed from Cygwin. Please
migrate to the other similar spam filtering programs.
Rationale
PACKAGE DESCRIPTION
===
Homepage: http://freecode.com/projects/bsfilter
License : GPL
A spam filter which can distinguish spam mail from other mails. It can
read mails by three way: reads from normal file or stdin, retrieves
and stores from IMAP server, reads from POP server and
PACKAGE DESCRIPTION
===
Homepage: http://people.csail.mit.edu/jrennie/ifile
License : GPL
A text filter that uses machine learning to classify texts into
groups. ifile works great as a spam filter. The text is classified by
a simple statistical method called Naive Bayes, which
PACKAGE DESCRIPTION
===
Homepage:http://www.sourceforge.net/projects/spambayes
License : Python
SpamBayes uses a different set of algorithm to most statistical spam
filters, which enables to dramatically lower the number of legitimate
mail classified as spam, through the
I tried re-sending my questions in a number of different ways; different
subject, reduced amount of example error messages and so forth. What finally
worked is that I re-sent the entire thing and did *not* attach the cygcheck.out
file. Not sure why the spam filters didn't like it.
On 4/29/2010 11:12 PM, Crow, Frank wrote:
I've been trying to send a question to the Cygwin list and I keep getting:
"Server refused mail at END OF DATA - 552 spam score exceeded threshold
(#5.6.1)"
Can anyone help me figure out why my question results in this? I'm not
spa
I've been trying to send a question to the Cygwin list and I keep getting:
"Server refused mail at END OF DATA - 552 spam score exceeded threshold
(#5.6.1)"
Can anyone help me figure out why my question results in this? I'm not
spamming! Just asking a couple of legitim
PACKAGE DESCRIPTION
===
Homepage: http://sourceforge.net/projects/spamprobe
License : QPL
This package provides a spam filter based on the article A Plan for
Spam by Paul Graham. It uses a database (either BerkeleyDB or a
simpler hash file) to store one- and two-word phrases
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 03:06:46PM -0500, Andrew wrote:
>I did. No response though :-( And again, I doubt the guide is at
>flaw..since every other site has roughly the same instructions.
It's unlikely that every other site tells you to edit cygwin.bat.
If that was really a requirement then we'd d
: November-25-08 2:46 PM
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: [SPAM] - Re: 1.5.25-15: Missing shell prompt when connecting remotely
via ssh using putty. - Sending mail server found on list.dsbl.org
On 11/25/2008, Andrew wrote:
> This is the guide I followed:
> http://ist.uwaterloo.ca/~k
d a snip from the message as it
>> may be helpful to diagnose the issues, but is seems like the spam filter
>> software is simply getting things wrong.
>
>Once again: mail problems are a subject for postmaster not the cygwin
>mailing list.
>
>However, don't both
rds like "annoying" and "broken".
>
> When this happens there is no real "bounce" just our mail server reporting
> the message failed to send. I've included a snip from the message as it
> may be helpful to diagnose the issues, but is seems like the s
ppens there is no real "bounce" just our mail server reporting
the message failed to send. I've included a snip from the message as it
may be helpful to diagnose the issues, but is seems like the spam filter
software is simply getting things wrong.
We've had that in the past here
PACKAGE DESCRIPTION
===
Homepage: http://freshmeat.net/projects/qsf
License : GPL
Quick Spam Filter (qsf) is a lightweight statistical spam filter. It
is designed to be small, fast, reliable, easy to install, and simple
to use in a procmail recipe. For these reasons it is not
PACKAGE DESCRIPTION
===
Homepage:http://www.sourceforge.net/projects/spambayes
License : Python
SpamBayes uses a different set of algorithm to most statistical spam
filters, which enables to dramatically lower the number of legitimate
mail classified as spam, through the
PACKAGE DESCRIPTION
===
Homepage: http://sourceforge.net/projects/spamprobe
License : QPL
This package provides a spam filter based on the article A Plan for
Spam by Paul Graham. It uses a database (either BerkeleyDB or a
simpler hash file) to store one- and two-word phrases
PACKAGE DESCRIPTION
===
Homepage: http://freshmeat.net/projects/spamoracle
License : GPL
A tool to help detect and filter away spam. It proceeds by statistical
analysis of the words that appear in the email, comparing the
frequencies of words with those found in a user-provided
PACKAGE DESCRIPTION
===
Homepage: http://people.csail.mit.edu/jrennie/ifile
License : GPL
A text filter that uses machine learning to classify texts into
groups. ifile works great as a spam filter. The text is classified by
a simple statistical method called Naive Bayes, which
PACKAGE DESCRIPTION
===
Homepage: http://sourceforge.jp/projects/bsfilter
License : GPL
A spam filter which can distinguish spam mail from other mails. It can
read mails by three way: reads from normal file or stdin, retrieves
and stores from IMAP server, reads from POP server
Corinna Vinschen cygwin.com> writes:
> I fixed both bugs in CVS. It's rather disappointing that
>
> SetFilePointer (handle, 0, NULL, FILE_END);
>
> fails for files > 4Gigs. It's actually required that the offset_high
> pointer is a valid pointer to a LONG containing 0. Oh well.
Nice catch
On May 29 15:28, Eric Blake wrote:
> Eric Blake byu.net> writes:
>
> > Somehow, when the file size is huge, cygwin is not properly propogating
> > that
> an
> > O_APPEND bit (0x9 in the flags printed from F_GETFL) means that the initial
> > offset of fd 1 is the end of the file. (And it woul
Corinna Vinschen cygwin.com> writes:
> >
> > assert (0 == lseek (open("existing", O_WRONLY | O_APPEND), 0, SEEK_CUR));
>
> Can you give me a pointer?
http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/open.html
"The file offset used to mark the current position within the file shall be se
On May 29 15:28, Eric Blake wrote:
> Eric Blake byu.net> writes:
>
> > Somehow, when the file size is huge, cygwin is not properly propogating
> > that
> an
> > O_APPEND bit (0x9 in the flags printed from F_GETFL) means that the initial
> > offset of fd 1 is the end of the file. (And it woul
Eric Blake byu.net> writes:
> Somehow, when the file size is huge, cygwin is not properly propogating that
an
> O_APPEND bit (0x9 in the flags printed from F_GETFL) means that the initial
> offset of fd 1 is the end of the file. (And it would be nice if strace would
> show the initial lseek
Peter Milne netspeed.com.au> writes:
>
> Hi Eric
>
> Were you able to reproduce the problem I encountered with dd?
Yes - and it looks like there is indeed a cygwin bug, unrelated to my newlib
patch to stdout.
$ cd /tmp
$ dd bs=1 seek=4540030013 if=/dev/zero of=huge count=1
$ ls -l huge blah
Hi Eric
Were you able to reproduce the problem I encountered with dd?
Cheers
Peter
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cyg
ssage-
From: Eric Blake [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, 26 May 2007 10:59 PM
To: Peter Milne; cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: [Spam?]Re: problem concating (>>) to a large file
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#PPIOSPE - redirecting to the list
On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 07:05:45PM -0800, Jim Kleckner wrote:
>The presence of a little bit of spam on this list reminds
>me how little normally gets through.
>
>I know it might be considered a little OT, but do you have
>a pointer to what techniques are used these days?
Spama
The presence of a little bit of spam on this list reminds
me how little normally gets through.
I know it might be considered a little OT, but do you have
a pointer to what techniques are used these days?
Thanks - Jim
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem
cygwin-talk". If you feel this
information absolutely must get out and that some cygwin.com list should
have it, you could try the cygwin-talk list. It may get caught by the
spam filters there too though. If so, your best bet is to try a different
forum not connected with cygwin.com. And f
Mike Marchywka
586 Saint James Walk
Marietta GA 30067-7165r
( NOTE MORE NEWER NUMBER )
404-788-1216 (C)<- leave message
989-348-4796 (P)<- emergency only
From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: what is
Mike Marchywka wrote:
Well, I obviously meant "content which I assume would be
of concern to a spam filter." I wouldn't
translate my prior post as, " I'm deeply concerned that
my information-free post containing only the links in my favorites
list was rejected by your
Well, I obviously meant "content which I assume would be
of concern to a spam filter." I wouldn't
translate my prior post as, " I'm deeply concerned that
my information-free post containing only the links in my favorites
list was rejected by your filter." :)
Link
Mike Marchywka wrote:
I've tried all the suggestions and simply give up- I have
a fairly long message with external links but no other content.
How do I defeat the spam filter or get moderator comments?
Mail to cygwin-owner bounced.
Thanks.
Read the response to the bounces. They co
I've tried all the suggestions and simply give up- I have
a fairly long message with external links but no other content.
How do I defeat the spam filter or get moderator comments?
Mail to cygwin-owner bounced.
Thanks.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Pr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Larry Hall wrote:
> René Berber wrote:
>> Charli Li wrote:
>> [snip]
>>> Please don't quote raw email addresses (aka:
>>> http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#PCYMTNQREAIYR)! This is an anti-spam
>>> measure use
Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
René Berber wrote:
Charli Li wrote:
[snip]
Please don't quote raw email addresses (aka:
http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#PCYMTNQREAIYR)! This is an anti-spam
measure used by the Cygwin lists (and probably the rest of sourceware's
lists).
http://cygwin.com/acro
René Berber wrote:
Charli Li wrote:
[snip]
Please don't quote raw email addresses (aka:
http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#PCYMTNQREAIYR)! This is an anti-spam
measure used by the Cygwin lists (and probably the rest of sourceware's
lists).
http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#TOFU
Could I get a n
René Berber wrote:
Charli Li wrote:
[snip]
Please don't quote raw email addresses (aka:
http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#PCYMTNQREAIYR)! This is an anti-spam
measure used by the Cygwin lists (and probably the rest of sourceware's
lists).
http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#TOFU
Could I get a n
Charli Li wrote:
[snip]
> Please don't quote raw email addresses (aka:
> http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#PCYMTNQREAIYR)! This is an anti-spam
> measure used by the Cygwin lists (and probably the rest of sourceware's
> lists).
>
> http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#TOFU
>
&
-Original Message-
Sent: Wed 8/30/2006 6:34 PM
Subject: [SPAM] Re: Color Schemes
Richard Lynch (Contractor) wrote:
> -Original Message-
> Sent: Wed 8/30/2006 5:13 PM
> Subject: [SPAM] RE: Color Schemes
> [snip]
Eek! Please, PLEASE http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#P
On Sun, 19 Mar 2006, Angelo Graziosi wrote:
> (I am trying to send the cygcheck.out but the email is rejected because
> suspected to be a spam. I have named the file 'cygcheout' but this
> does not work. Also Copy/Paste does not work. Any suggestion ?)
<http://sourceware.or
The message cannot be represented in 7-bit ASCII encoding and has been sent as
a binary attachment.
Potentially Dangerous Attachment Removed. The file "body.bat" has been blocked.
File quarantined as: "".
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:
PID 2488 : Invalid argument, while reading line user=??? host=UNKNOWN.
And when i set cygserv login not as SYSTEM account I get:
Invalid argument, while reading line user=dem host=UNKNOWN.
(dem it is My account)
--
With respect, Dmitry.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsub
On Thu, 23 Jun 2005, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Jun 23 12:02, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> > No, SYSTEM and LocalSystem are two names for the same user. It's known as
> > SYSTEM in Cygwin, but Windows calls it LocalSystem. Perhaps the above
> > link should be amended to clarify this.
>
> No, it'
On Jun 23 18:17, Dave Korn wrote:
> Original Message
> >From: Corinna Vinschen
> >Sent: 23 June 2005 18:10
>
> > On Jun 23 12:02, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> >> No, SYSTEM and LocalSystem are two names for the same user. It's known
> >> as SYSTEM in Cygwin, but Windows calls it LocalSystem
Original Message
>From: Corinna Vinschen
>Sent: 23 June 2005 18:10
> On Jun 23 12:02, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>> No, SYSTEM and LocalSystem are two names for the same user. It's known
>> as SYSTEM in Cygwin, but Windows calls it LocalSystem. Perhaps the above
>> link should be amended t
On Jun 23 12:02, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> No, SYSTEM and LocalSystem are two names for the same user. It's known as
> SYSTEM in Cygwin, but Windows calls it LocalSystem. Perhaps the above
> link should be amended to clarify this.
No, it's know in Windows as SYSTEM. The string "LocalSystem" on
Thursday, June 23, 2005 15:14
> To: Christophe Delarue
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#PCYMTNQREAIYR>. Thanks.
> Subject: [spam] Re: Windows rights
>
> > Same problem in both cases. Read all of
> > <http://cygwin.com/cygwin-ug-net/n
network drives ?
Thanks' again
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Igor Pechtchanski
Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2005 15:14
To: Christophe Delarue
Cc: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: [spam] Re: Windows rights
Same problem in both cases. Read al
> Dear Cygwin,
>
> We just sent you an email titled "Please help us with a
> 'make' command error".
> Now we found another problem with cygwin. We just noticed
> that there is no gcc
> compiler in cygwin's directory. We don't know how to move
> forward without gcc.
> Could you please help us
Oops!
Sorry for all those spelling errors.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> Just FYI,
>
> these latest postings (which are 99% already filtered by the spam detection
> software on sourceware.org!) are the result of the most recent version of
> the Sober worm, Sober.P. Sober.P's only job was apparently to download the
> n
Just FYI,
these latest postings (which are 99% already filtered by the spam detection
software on sourceware.org!) are the result of the most recent version of
the Sober worm, Sober.P. Sober.P's only job was apparently to download the
next generation, Sober.Q into the infected PCs. So
The workaround I'm considering is: to build a list of only the user logon names
we need for /etc/passwd (a fairly small subset of the domain), and then
write a shell script (driven by this list) to repeatedly call
"mkpasswd -l -d -u USERNAMEHERE >> /etc/passwd".
A co-worker speculates that Microso
Andrew spammed the list.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Dear abuse team,
One of your referral customers just spammed a public mailing list with an
advert for your promotion; you can see this in the mailing list archives at
http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2004-08/msg00858.html
This is not what the list is for. It is utterly unwelcome, off-
y-9
These are the cygwin packages you'd need.
HTH
--
Regards,
Hitanshu
-*-*-*-*-
'Wenn Sie nicht Deutsches verstehen können, warum sind Sie Stille lebendig?'
On Thu, 6 May 2004, Tarun Sharma wrote:
> Date: Thu, 6 May 2004 01:56:17 +0200
> From: Tarun Sharma <[EMAIL PRO
n another function ?
>
> TIA
>
> Neto
> brazil
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Igor Pechtchanski
> Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 1:25 PM
> To: Neto, Antonio Jose Rodrigues
> Cc: cygwincygwincom
> Subject: RE: SPAM: Re: gettimeofday() similar function
>
>
On Wed, 31 Mar 2004, Neto, Antonio Jose Rodrigues wrote:
> Ok, but when I try to compile using -mno-cygwin that is not working.
>
> Why?
>
Isn't it obvious? gettimeofday is in Cygwin. You asked for no Cygwin
(ie. mingw). Look at www.mingw.org for details as this is now off topic.
Here come tho
How do I resolve this?
-Original Message-
From: Igor Pechtchanski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 1:30 PM
To: Neto, Antonio Jose Rodrigues
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: SPAM: Re: gettimeofday() similar function
On Wed, 31 Mar 2004, Neto, Antonio Jose
ednesday, March 31, 2004 1:25 PM
> To: Neto, Antonio Jose Rodrigues
> Cc: cygwincygwincom
> Subject: SPAM: Re: gettimeofday() similar function
>
>
> On Wed, 31 Mar 2004, Neto, Antonio Jose Rodrigues wrote:
>
> > Hi Brian,
> >
> > Do you know?
> >
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 1:25 PM
To: Neto, Antonio Jose Rodrigues
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: SPAM: Re: gettimeofday() similar function
Neto,
Have you actually tried?
Igor
P.S. Please configure your mailer to not quote raw e-mail addresses in
your repli
Ok, but when I try to compile using -mno-cygwin that is not working.
Why?
-Original Message-
From: Brian Ford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 1:25 PM
To: Neto, Antonio Jose Rodrigues
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: SPAM: Re: gettimeofday() similar function
On
Neto,
Have you actually tried?
Igor
P.S. Please configure your mailer to not quote raw e-mail addresses in
your replies -- let's not feed the spam harvesters.
P.P.S. He was being sarcastic.
P.P.P.S. Looking at the subject, so were you. :-)
On Wed, 31 Mar 2004, Neto, Antonio
Hi Brian,
Do you know?
TIA
neto
-Original Message-
From: Brian Ford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 1:18 PM
To: Neto, Antonio Jose Rodrigues
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: SPAM: Re: gettimeofday() similar function
On Wed, 31 Mar 2004, Neto, Antonio Jose
Dear Rafael,
> There was some memory allocation related funkiness in DBD::Pg that the
> attached patch fixes. You can apply it to both 1.31 and 1.32_1.
>
> Bug posted on CPAN:
> http://rt.cpan.org/NoAuth/Bug.html?id=5357
All the tests now pass and everything works perfectly. Thanks very much
for
Your mail has been rejected as spam.
It was NOT received. If your email was not spam,
please send a note to the original destination
letting them know that this happened.
- Thank you.
(Please do not reply to this message, as it will
not arrive at the original destination.)
--
Unsubscribe
s: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: test post: how2 prevent a cygwin post from being spam-blocked?
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-note: careful: sendmail insists on just a blank line to end mail headers
X-note: careful:
On Fri, 5 Dec 2003, Tom Rodman wrote:
> Yesterday (12/5/03) I posted a question 3 times to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For two of these I was able to watch and verify that a redhat MTA
> accepted the mail. None of the posts shown yesterday, and no
> bounced e-mail was returned.
>
> What checks are done b
Yesterday (12/5/03) I posted a question 3 times to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For two of these I was able to watch and verify that a redhat MTA
accepted the mail. None of the posts shown yesterday, and no
bounced e-mail was returned.
What checks are done before a post is accepted, so I/we can adjust.
Yest
Got this recently. It's a virus (that's been cleaned already) but it
appears to have gotten it's target from the list.
===
I don't suffer from insanity. I enjoy every minute of it.
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,
I'm getting the same sort of problems:-
compress+bz::error calls + blank chooser lines an
On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 22:49:35 -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> I just checked in a new version of the spam blocker which worked well in
> testing but died a horrible death in production.
>
> Sorry about the spam/viruses that came through.
It should give us a better appreciation
http://www.dilbert.com/comics/dilbert/archive/dilbert-20030821.html
Regards
mks
Christopher Faylor wrote:
I just checked in a new version of the spam blocker which worked well in
testing but died a horrible death in production.
Sorry about the spam/viruses that came through.
cgf
I just checked in a new version of the spam blocker which worked well in
testing but died a horrible death in production.
Sorry about the spam/viruses that came through.
cgf
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
1 - 100 of 120 matches
Mail list logo
