Brian Ford wrote:
Does any of this help you understand where CGF is coming from?
Brian,
Thanks for taking the time to explain the situation to me.
I'm not sure what I'll do at this point.
I think this is a worthwhile patch in general. The precompiled
header processing in gcc is a valuable feature t
On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 10:07:21PM -0700, Earl Chew wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>>What do you suggest?
>>
>>If you have a patch that's ready to go, I'll review it. If it isn't
>>ready to go then there's not anything for me to do as far as I can tell.
>>
>>If you're asking me to work on it,
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004, Earl Chew wrote:
> Christopher Faylor wrote:
> > If you have a patch that's ready to go, I'll review it. If it isn't
> > ready to go then there's not anything for me to do as far as I can tell.
> >
> > If you're asking me to work on it, then that is something I don't have
> >
Christopher Faylor wrote:
What do you suggest?
If you have a patch that's ready to go, I'll review it. If it isn't
ready to go then there's not anything for me to do as far as I can tell.
If you're asking me to work on it, then that is something I don't have
time to do.
Chris,
I'm asking whether I
On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 04:00:08PM -0700, Earl Chew wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>I don't understand what you are implying. Is this patch ready to go
>>or does it need more work?
>
>Please refer to my reply to your previous response:
>
>http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-10/msg01996.html
Christopher Faylor wrote:
I don't understand what you are implying. Is this patch ready to go
or does it need more work?
Chris,
Please refer to my reply to your previous response:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-10/msg01996.html
What do you suggest?
Earl
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cy
6 matches
Mail list logo
