On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 03:52:06AM -0800, James Michael DuPont wrote:
>Maybe this should be a release criterion?
Not interested. Sorry.
>Maybe you don't care if the gcc is fully usable before it is release?
GCC *is* fully usable. If you can't build it, use the gcc binary that
is provided. As
Mike,
At 07:37 2002-12-03, you wrote:
Dear fellow hackers,
...
Silly me in thinking that something positive would come from making
sarcastic jibes, it looks like I am not making any friends with my
statements.
Yes, it is silly. The ability to convey sarcasm in print (absent facial and
vocal
>From: James Michael DuPont [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2002 07:37:34 -0800 (PST)
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Resolved Re: gcc-3.2-1/i686-pc-cygwin/gcc/genflags is
>segfaulting
> I guess the assumption there is that
without wanting to interrupt your nice rhetorical discussions,
I wanted to ask you if you could reveal the trick which makes genflags not to segfault
in 3.2-3.
It happens again in newly released gcc-3.2.1 which I would be very glad to (build and)
use under cygwin...
--
Unsubscribe info:
Dear fellow hackers,
Thank you all for providing cygwin, it is a great toolkit,
I use it every day and recommend it to everyone who uses windows.
I dont have any problems with the support, my sacrastic remarks got a
negative response, not the desired one.
So I retract any sarcasm. Apologies if
At 06:52 AM 12/3/2002, James Michael DuPont wrote:
> > Chris Faylor, as a search of the announce lists would have told you.
> > I think he builds his packages on linux with a cross-compiler, so
> > wouldn't have any advice for your particular problem.
>
>OK, that is what I was thinking. I will sta
> Chris Faylor, as a search of the announce lists would have told you.
> I think he builds his packages on linux with a cross-compiler, so
> wouldn't have any advice for your particular problem.
OK, that is what I was thinking. I will start looking for instructions
on doing this, I have the mingw
Dear Fellow Hackers,
I must say that I am a bit dissappointed that I did not get any
response about the cygwin segfaulting.
Can you please tell me : Has anyone ever built gcc-3.2-1 under cygwin?
Who builds the packages in the cygwin installer?
In any case, the gcc-3.2-3 builds fine,
but the cod
8 matches
Mail list logo
