ttp://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2002-05/msg01685.html
>
>Marino
>
>- Original Message -
>From: "Bruce Eckel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "John Morrison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 6:06 PM
>
"Bruce Eckel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "John Morrison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 6:06 PM
>Subject: RE: Request for bashhere.inf
>
>
>> The attached is the only one I seem to have, but I know
On Fri, 20 Dec 2002 10:06:40 -0700 Bruce Eckel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The attached is the only one I seem to have, but I know there was
> another one floating around which seemed a bit better. The problem
> is that I don't know much about INF files (seems to be an arcane
> knowledge) so I do
The attached is the only one I seem to have, but I know there was
another one floating around which seemed a bit better. The problem
is that I don't know much about INF files (seems to be an arcane
knowledge) so I don't know how good/bad this one is, but I think
it's what I'm currently using. Howev
> From: Bruce Eckel
Hi, nice to see you somewhere other than the Apache FOP list ;)
> I use the "bash prompt here" tool all the time, but I've had to
> rely on some rather transient versions, and sometimes self-hacked
> approaches.
It's not something I usually use, but...
> I was hoping that yo
I use the "bash prompt here" tool all the time, but I've had to
rely on some rather transient versions, and sometimes self-hacked
approaches.
I was hoping that you folks might consider putting a well-written
one as part of the standard distribution, so everyone could
benefit. Just hoping...
PS: p
6 matches
Mail list logo
