Corinna Vinschen wrote:
No, it's not. There's a major difference between mount points and
symlinks, which is, mount points are handled inside the kernel, while
symlinks are filesystem objects. Reparse points are very certainly
filesystem objects. And bind mounts in Cygwin are handled in the
"k
On Apr 9 05:07, Linda Walsh wrote:
> Forgive me if this posts a 2nd time, but I haven't seen it come
> back after 6+ hours, so not sure where it went.
>
> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >
> >No, it's not. There's a major difference between mount points and
> >symlinks, which is, mount points are hand
Forgive me if this posts a 2nd time, but I haven't seen it come
back after 6+ hours, so not sure where it went.
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
No, it's not. There's a major difference between mount points and
symlinks, which is, mount points are handled inside the kernel, while
symlinks are filesyste
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
.
No, it's not. There's a major difference between mount points and
symlinks, which is, mount points are handled inside the kernel, while
symlinks are filesystem objects. Reparse points are very certainly
filesystem objects. And bind mounts in Cygwin are handled in the
On Apr 7 22:04, Andrey Repin wrote:
> Greetings, Corinna Vinschen!
>
> >> I don't think your original concern is as big a problem as you
> >> think, as is indicated by the above setup on linux.
> >>
> >> I.e. is there some other reason to not treat "linkd" mounts
> >> the same as "mountvol" moun
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 09:52:02AM +1000, Duncan Roe wrote:
>On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 11:34:02AM -0700, Linda Walsh wrote:
>> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> >Look, directory reparse points are, by and large, symlinks to another,
>> >real directory entry. The directory has a primary path, which is its
>
On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 11:34:02AM -0700, Linda Walsh wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >Look, directory reparse points are, by and large, symlinks to another,
> >real directory entry. The directory has a primary path, which is its
> >own path under which it has been created, and the reparse poin
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Look, directory reparse points are, by and large, symlinks to another,
real directory entry. The directory has a primary path, which is its
own path under which it has been created, and the reparse point is just
a pointer to this directory. If that's not a symlink, what
Greetings, Corinna Vinschen!
>> I don't think your original concern is as big a problem as you
>> think, as is indicated by the above setup on linux.
>>
>> I.e. is there some other reason to not treat "linkd" mounts
>> the same as "mountvol" mounts -- in a manner equivalent to linux's
>> 'bind' m
On Apr 5 04:13, Linda Walsh wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >On Apr 1 09:39, Linda Walsh wrote:
> >>If I mount a device using mount vol in 2 different places, will they
> >>have different device numbers the same?
> >
> >The same, just as on Linux.
> ---
> Why special case junctions creat
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Apr 1 09:39, Linda Walsh wrote:
If I mount a device using mount vol in 2 different places, will they
have different device numbers the same?
The same, just as on Linux.
---
Why special case junctions created with 'linkd' to return
as symlinks but not 'mount
On Apr 1 09:39, Linda Walsh wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >On Mar 29 05:53, Linda Walsh wrote:
> >>Linda Walsh wrote:
> >>>If you use the 'mountvol' you a *local* root folder
> >>>mounted at some drive letter that can be maintained over
> >>>boots. is listed as a JUNCTION and treated by cygwi
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Mar 29 05:53, Linda Walsh wrote:
Linda Walsh wrote:
If you use the 'mountvol' you a *local* root folder
mounted at some drive letter that can be maintained over
boots. is listed as a JUNCTION and treated by cygwin
as a regular dir.
For some reason the other type of d
On Mar 29 05:53, Linda Walsh wrote:
> Linda Walsh wrote:
> >If you use the 'mountvol' you a *local* root folder
> >mounted at some drive letter that can be maintained over
> >boots. is listed as a JUNCTION and treated by cygwin
> >as a regular dir.
> >
> >For some reason the other type of directory
Linda Walsh wrote:
If you use the 'mountvol' you a *local* root folder
mounted at some drive letter that can be maintained over
boots. is listed as a JUNCTION and treated by cygwin
as a regular dir.
For some reason the other type of directory hookup made
by "linkd" which also created a JUNKTION
If you use the 'mountvol' you a *local* root folder
mounted at some drive letter that can be maintained over
boots. is listed as a JUNCTION and treated by cygwin
as a regular dir.
For some reason the other type of directory hookup made
by "linkd" which also created a JUNKTION
vs. (mklink creating
16 matches
Mail list logo
