On Tue, 2 Mar 2004, Charles Plager wrote:
> Larry Hall wrote:
>
> > Setup will eventually handle version dependencies too (it may be set up
> > for it now, I didn't check). That means that setup will understand if
> > it's dependencies need to be updated as well. For now, you don't have
> > that
Larry Hall wrote:
Setup will eventually handle version dependencies too (it may be set up
for it now, I didn't check). That means that setup will understand if
it's dependencies need to be updated as well. For now, you don't have
that option (either because it's not completely there yet in se
Hello,
I don't know if this has been discussed before or not (my apologies if
I missed it). It seems clear to me that not everybody always wants to
upgrade to the latest version of the cygwin dll. The problem comes when
we do want to upgrade one particular piece of cygwin. As far as I can
t
At 07:32 PM 2/26/2004, Charles Plager you wrote:
>Hello,
>I don't know if this has been discussed before or not (my apologies if I missed
> it). It seems clear to me that not everybody always wants to upgrade to the latest
> version of the cygwin dll. The problem comes when we do want to up
Larry Hall wrote:
At 07:32 PM 2/26/2004, Charles Plager you wrote:
Hello,
I don't know if this has been discussed before or not (my apologies if I missed it).
It seems clear to me that not everybody always wants to upgrade to the latest version
of the cygwin dll. The problem comes when we
5 matches
Mail list logo
