On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 1:59 PM Jon Turney wrote:
> This seems to be an upstream problem with libX11 1.8.3
>
> I've withdrawn that version (so setup should automatically downgrade to
> the previous version, 1.8.1)
Thank you, Jon.
Yes Ken, the problems show up in Emacs 28.2
--
Jim Reisert AD1C
his in the console:
Xlib: sequence lost (0x1 > 0x16c) in reply type 0x13!
Xlib: sequence lost (0x1 > 0x172) in reply type 0x1c!
Xlib: sequence lost (0x10000 > 0x17f) in reply type 0xf!
Xlib: sequence lost (0x10000 > 0x185) in reply type 0x1c!
Xlib: sequence lost (0x1 > 0x1ba
On 12/19/2022 11:52 AM, Jim Reisert AD1C via Cygwin wrote:
I just updated Cygwin to "3.4.3-1.x86_64 2022-12-16 12:38 UTC x86_64
Cygwin" and in addition the X package refresh. I started emacs-X11 in
an xterm and am now seeing this in the console:
Xlib: sequence lost (0x1 > 0x
On 19/12/2022 16:52, Jim Reisert AD1C via Cygwin wrote:
I just updated Cygwin to "3.4.3-1.x86_64 2022-12-16 12:38 UTC x86_64
Cygwin" and in addition the X package refresh. I started emacs-X11 in
an xterm and am now seeing this in the console:
Xlib: sequence lost (0x1 > 0x16c)
I just updated Cygwin to "3.4.3-1.x86_64 2022-12-16 12:38 UTC x86_64
Cygwin" and in addition the X package refresh. I started emacs-X11 in
an xterm and am now seeing this in the console:
Xlib: sequence lost (0x1 > 0x16c) in reply type 0x13!
Xlib: sequence lost (0x1 > 0x17
s.
Kindly let me know your 'Target audience and Geography' so I will get back to
you with the counts, samples, and pricing.
I look forward to hearing from you!
Regards,
Electa Kovacek
Database Coordinator
If you do not wish to receive this newsletter, reply No thanks.
--
Problem
lists post are not
reporting anymore the reply to the list tag ?
You seems to have replied to an off-list mail.
msgid:0d9b4a1b-05ba-8ab1-3783-c3d1f04f9...@gmail.com is not found in my list
archive.
not that the issue.
That give me the idea that I am not the only one with the issue,
as I am changing
t; it is just me or the cygwin mailing lists post are not
> > > > > reporting anymore the reply to the list tag ?
> > > >
> > > > You seems to have replied to an off-list mail.
> > > >
> > > > msgid:0d9b4a1b-05ba-8ab1-3783-c3d1f04f9...@
On 5/18/2020 11:07 AM, Jon Turney wrote:
On 16/05/2020 20:42, Marco Atzeri via Cygwin wrote:
On 16.05.2020 20:47, Andrey Repin wrote:
Greetings, Marco Atzeri!
it is just me or the cygwin mailing lists post are not
reporting anymore the reply to the list tag ?
You seems to have replied to
On 16/05/2020 20:42, Marco Atzeri via Cygwin wrote:
On 16.05.2020 20:47, Andrey Repin wrote:
Greetings, Marco Atzeri!
it is just me or the cygwin mailing lists post are not
reporting anymore the reply to the list tag ?
You seems to have replied to an off-list mail.
msgid:0d9b4a1b-05ba-8ab1
On 2020-05-16 13:42, Marco Atzeri via Cygwin wrote:
> On 16.05.2020 20:47, Andrey Repin wrote:
>> Greetings, Marco Atzeri!
>>
>>> it is just me or the cygwin mailing lists post are not
>>> reporting anymore the reply to the list tag ?
>>
>>
On 16.05.2020 20:47, Andrey Repin wrote:
Greetings, Marco Atzeri!
it is just me or the cygwin mailing lists post are not
reporting anymore the reply to the list tag ?
You seems to have replied to an off-list mail.
msgid:0d9b4a1b-05ba-8ab1-3783-c3d1f04f9...@gmail.com is not found in my list
Greetings, Marco Atzeri!
> it is just me or the cygwin mailing lists post are not
> reporting anymore the reply to the list tag ?
You seems to have replied to an off-list mail.
msgid:0d9b4a1b-05ba-8ab1-3783-c3d1f04f9...@gmail.com is not found in my list
archive.
> I am using Thunde
On Sat, 16 May 2020 at 12:10, Marco Atzeri via Cygwin
wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> it is just me or the cygwin mailing lists post are not
> reporting anymore the reply to the list tag ?
>
> I am using Thunderbird and the option reply to list is not
> offered anymore for any of th
Hi guys,
it is just me or the cygwin mailing lists post are not
reporting anymore the reply to the list tag ?
I am using Thunderbird and the option reply to list is not
offered anymore for any of the cygwin mailing list.
When I reply the original sender is offered instead of
the specific
Hi,
Products Available:
JP54, D2 GAS OIL, D6 VIRGIN FUEL OIL LNG/LPG, EN 590, MAZUT M100 GOST–10585,
JETFUEL A1 91/91, RUSSIAN PETROLEUM COKE.
Delivery:
Vessel take over (VTO), Tank Take Over (TTO), Vessel to Vessel (VTV), Vessel to
Tank (VTO), FOB/Dip & Pay, CIF
Inspection:
SGS test report
On Dec 5 22:02, Brian Inglis wrote:
> On 2017-12-05 17:10, Thomas Taylor wrote:
> > How do I reply to a post so that all previous replies are included, and are
> > nested to the appropriate depth? I'm using Thunderbird 52.5.0 (32-bit) on
> > Windows 7. Thanks!
&
On 2017-12-05 17:10, Thomas Taylor wrote:
> How do I reply to a post so that all previous replies are included, and are
> nested to the appropriate depth? I'm using Thunderbird 52.5.0 (32-bit) on
> Windows 7. Thanks!
Right click/Reply to list.
First ensure that cygwin.com and sour
How do I reply to a post so that all previous replies are included, and
are nested to the appropriate depth? I'm using Thunderbird 52.5.0
(32-bit) on Windows 7. Thanks!
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Document
On 2017-03-30 10:44, Michael Enright wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 11:28 PM, 高锋 wrote:
>> Two days ago, I wanted to determine whether a udp port of another
>> machine is open or not, which is deployed on different subnet. But
>> Windows platform does not provide utility that can do this. So I
>
Greetings, 高锋!
Please don' top-post. Thank you.
> Two days ago,i wanted to determine whether a udp port of another machine is
> open or not, which is deployed on different subnet.
> But windows platform does not provide utility that can dose this.So i
> downloaded a setup.exe from cygwin,of which
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 11:28 PM, 高锋 wrote:
> Two days ago,i wanted to determine whether a udp port of another machine is
> open or not, which is deployed on different subnet.
> But windows platform does not provide utility that can dose this.So i
> downloaded a setup.exe from cygwin,of which ver
Two days ago,i wanted to determine whether a udp port of another machine is
open or not, which is deployed on different subnet.
But windows platform does not provide utility that can dose this.So i
downloaded a setup.exe from cygwin,of which version is 2.877(64 bit),and i had
never use this util
Good Day,
I have been trying to reach you without success. Kindly reply ASAP in order to
get back to you in details, regarding why I have been trying to reach you .
Regards,
Barr. Louis Gardner
Prudent Legal Attorney
Direct Telephone: +27875503424
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com
Larry Hall
>On 2/17/2011 1:49 PM, Stan wrote:
>>
>> I've run cygcheck and tried this on two systems with the same
>> results; at this point I'm assuming the problem is not local so I'm
>> not including the typically requested data. I will be glad to follow
>> up if my assumption turns out to be inc
Congratulations,
Reference to annual united kingdom promotion conducted in UK 2010. We are happy
to inform you of your winnings £980,000. Contact me immediately for more
details.
Thank you,
Mr. David Smith
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http
Attn:
We have a job opening for the position of Accounts receivable officer. Would
you like to work from your home and get paid Weekly? We are offering this
position to all interested applicants. Please carefully read through.
ASHLEY FURNITURE COMPANY is a well established Manufacturing Firm th
Dear User,
Our system was unable to create the ticket due to the following reason:
o) [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Email to which the ticket was directed does not exist
in database.
You are requested to notify the admin at [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the details of
the ticket.
Thank You,
YourLeadMach
On 2008-07-28, Dave Korn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> r wrote on 28 July 2008 08:21:
>
>> Unlike linux, cygwin does not warn me about new mail messages
>> in inbox.
>
>> but in cygwin, there is no "write" command.
>
> And bizarrely we have "wall" but no "walld".
>
>> Is there something like it o
r wrote on 28 July 2008 08:21:
> Unlike linux, cygwin does not warn me about new mail messages
> in inbox.
> but in cygwin, there is no "write" command.
And bizarrely we have "wall" but no "walld".
> Is there something like it or another way to be advised ??
Could use the windows equivale
On 04/01/2008, Tatsuro MATSUOKA wrote:
I have to polish my English writing as good as you have wriiten. :-)
Your English is much better than my (non-existant) Japanese so I have no
cause to complain. ;-)
--
Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc.
ver a
> question or issue comes up.
>
> I'm not suggesting that the above applies to this case. It's just something
> that came to mind while reading your reply.
>
> > I have been waiting the reply like the above. I am not a specialist for
> > the cygwin so I
Tatsuro MATSUOKA wrote:
Dear Larry Hall
Thanks to Larry for your immdiate reply.
--- "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think it's great that you attempted to work with Vinod to help him get a
better understanding of things. But I think you're mis
Dear Larry Hall
Thanks to Larry for your immdiate reply.
--- "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think it's great that you attempted to work with Vinod to help him get a
> better understanding of things. But I think you're missing a point here
n the VISTA.
I think that the purpose of the cygwin is to realize giving us Unixy
evironmets and enabling us to use
Unixy software on the Windows.
The VISTA is now populateing day by day.
I think it is important to discuss what is the problem of the cygwin on the VISTA.
I ask the cygwin people rep
hat the purpose of the cygwin is to realize giving us Unixy evironmets
and enabling us to use
Unixy software on the Windows.
The VISTA is now populateing day by day.
I think it is important to discuss what is the problem of the cygwin on the
VISTA.
I ask the cygwin people reply to Vinod
ails and the reply suggest me to do that.
I could not find about rebasing in the cygwin FAQ.
My opinion is that what is important rebasisng is explained in the web.
Insisting of the impovement of the setup from users is natural.
However, I also consider users understand that the cygwin depend on th
> 1) Why does the Reply-To have cygwin 3 times?
Because cfg's mails at the moment have 1 Reply-To- and 2
Mail-Followup-To-Fields in the header at the moment. Like this:
> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
> Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
> Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.co
On 08 December 2006 17:36, Voss, Douglas C @ CSW-SLC wrote:
> I'm not sure how this works to put up a reply,
People don't usually bother replying to 5-year old problem reports!
> but having the same problem,
You probably don't have the same problem. The OP
I'm not sure how this works to put up a reply, but having the same problem, I
found a solution not included in the followups:
Try it without the \ before the ;
c:\cygwin\bin\find.exe . -name "files to search pattern" -exec
c:\cygwin\bin\grep.exe "search string" &#x
On Wed, 2005-10-26 at 11:43 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> NOTE: This is one mail before the last on this matter.
> LIST 1: PACKAGES WITH UNCLEAR OWNERSHIP
> ===
>
> dpkg Robert Collins or up for grabs?
> squid
On Wed, 2005-10-26 at 11:43 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> NOTE: This is one mail before the last on this matter.
> LIST 1: PACKAGES WITH UNCLEAR OWNERSHIP
> ===
>
> dpkg Robert Collins or up for grabs?
> squid
re's apparently a need to find out, which packages are still maintained
> and which have lost their maintainer on the way.
>
> So, ALL maintainers of Cygwin packages,
>
> please reply to this mail within the next six weeks,
>
>
Other earlier appearances in (not an exclusive list):
http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2004-10/msg00157.html
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2004-01/msg00492.html (kind of)
http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2003-05/msg01483.html
http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2002-10/msg01952.html
http://sou
Check attached file.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Good offer.
***
** Attachment demo.exe was infected with virus,
** attachment part was removed.
***
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Probl
iler"
> option.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Igor Pechtchanski [mailto:pechtchacsnyuedu]
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2004 12:36 PM
> > To: Koskie, Sarah
> > Cc: cygwincygwincom
> > Subject: Re: trying to reply to specific message
Speaki
On Tue, Sep 21, 2004 at 12:52:34PM -0500, Koskie, Sarah wrote:
>Oh well. I guess I'll have to work on the "getting a better mailer"
>option.
Or use the unofficial cygwin newsgroup as mentioned at the main cygwin
web page...
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Probl
pam block and you're a subscriber and want your post to be allowed
through.
I can't remember what the name of the actual list you're looking for is,
but it's the one that sets the Reply-To: header. Maybe someone else will
jump in with it now . ?
cheers,
DaveK
-
> -Original Message-
> From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Dave Korn
> Sent: 21 September 2004 18:29
Ah. I mean "In-Reply-To" where I said "References:". Here's the kind of
thing my version of outlook adds when I reply to a post:
In-Reply-To:
<[EM
etting a better mailer"
option.
> -Original Message-
> From: Igor Pechtchanski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2004 12:36 PM
> To: Koskie, Sarah
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: trying to reply to specific message
>
> On Tue, 21 Sep 2004, K
or the original sender not the mailing list
> so I changed that to the mailing list, but, of course, my reply did not
> get posted as a follow on to the message.
Then MS Outlook is more retarded than I thought. Pine, for example, can
easily reply to attached messages...
> I also checked th
for the original sender not the
> mailing list
> so I changed that to the mailing list, but, of course, my
> reply did not
> get posted as a follow on to the message.
That's nothing to do with changing the To: address. Any post that is a
reply should carry a References: heade
the mailing list, but, of course, my reply did not
get posted as a follow on to the message. I also checked the earlier
discussion you referenced which seemed to indicate that I should
subscribe to cygwin-allow. I tried that and received the following:
Hi. This is the qmail-send program at sourcewa
ATTENTION, PLEASE
Good day. I need your services in a confidential matter regarding moneyout
of a family treasure beneficiary estate.
This requires a private arrangement. Could you perhaps receive thesefunds
under legal claims? I am willing to pay a generous management fee as wellas
appreciati
On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 10:12:08AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>How do I subscribe?
Here is the last word on this subject: http://cygwin.com/ .
This is the cygwin web page. It really should be no surprise that there
is information about matters like this at that site.
--
Christopher Faylor
Thanks Danilo, I'll give gmane a go.
DISCLAIMER. The contents of this email and its attachments are intended
solely for the original recipients and express the views of the authors
and not necessarily the Co
I access the Cygwin mainling lists through gmane.org, that acting as
"virtual" news server (news.gmane.org) makes the mailing lists behave as
newsgroups.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How do I subscribe?
DISCL
How do I subscribe?
DISCLAIMER. The contents of this email and its attachments are intended
solely for the original recipients and express the views of the authors
and not necessarily the Company. If you a
On Mon, 15 Mar 2004, Ben Taylor wrote:
> Nice mailing list! Glad I discovered it.
> Just one problem - how do you reply to an existing message???!!!
> Like on newsgroups???
You subscribe and then "Reply" to the message in your mailbox... :-)
If you want to get a mess
Nice mailing list! Glad I discovered it.
Just one problem - how do you reply to an existing message???!!!
Like on newsgroups???
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 10:10:01PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>If this email makes it to the list without a reply-to, I will continue
>to tweak things. Please don't take that as an indication that I want
>to enter into a personal dialog about cygwin or reply-tos.
>X-IsSub
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]", then
>>the mailing list software should set the reply-to to the same value
>>as your from address whenever you send email to the cygwin mailing list.
>>
>>I've also added an X-IsSubscribed field to the header of any message
>>that come
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 08:11:15PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>I've made good my threat and implemented a new feature exclusively for
>the cygwin mailing list.
>
>If you send email to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]", then
>the mailing list software should set the reply-to t
On Mon, 15 Dec 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> I've made good my threat and implemented a new feature exclusively for
> the cygwin mailing list.
> [snip]
> I've also added an X-IsSubscribed field to the header of any message
> that comes from an address that is recognized as being subscribed. Y
I've made good my threat and implemented a new feature exclusively for
the cygwin mailing list.
If you send email to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]", then
the mailing list software should set the reply-to to the same value
as your from address whenever you send email to the cygwin mailing l
*** îÅ ÂÙÌÏ ××ÅÄÅÎÏ ÎÉ ÏÄÎÏÊ ËÏÍÁÎÄÙ
*** No commands recognized
USENET NEWS MAILSERVER
If you want to get a Russian version of this help, please,
add 'MSG R' command before 'HELP' one:
> mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MSG R
HELP
.
This automatic news mail server (ver.
- Original Message -
From: "Brian Dessent"
> Carlo Florendo wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > Starting today, everytime I post to cygwin, I receive the following message below.
> > I'm not sending to netlibd nor am I a member
of
> > the netlibd mailing list. There is a reference to some s
Carlo Florendo wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Starting today, everytime I post to cygwin, I receive the following message below.
> I'm not sending to netlibd nor am I a member of
> the netlibd mailing list. There is a reference to some sort of this problem last
> week
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cy
Hello,
Starting today, everytime I post to cygwin, I receive the following message below.
I'm not sending to netlibd nor am I a member of
the netlibd mailing list. There is a reference to some sort of this problem last week
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2003-06/msg01329.html but I got no
Hello My Dear,
I am Mrs Rose Savimbi please i need your help since after the
incidence that lead to the death of my late husband
MR JONAS SAVIMBI of unita of Angola .I know we have not met before but I
am contacting you with due sense of humanity responsibility and the few
awareness that you will
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 03:54:30PM -0700, Biju G C wrote:
>--- Randall R Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>The Reply-To: header (or, more precisely, control over it) belongs to
>>the originator of the mail, not to the list server or its
>>administrator.
>
>T
At 15:54 2003-06-03, Biju G C wrote:
--- Randall R Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The Reply-To: header (or, more precisely, control over it) belongs to
> the originator of the mail, not to the list server or its administrator.
>
> Randall Schulz
Then how i
> Then how is it happening in cygwin-xfree list?
> No were in my mail system I have mentioned "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
> And I use same mail-id with same settings
> to access both "cygwin" and "cygwin-xfree"
>
> But they do it differently !!!
> [...]
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 02:13:05PM -0700, Randall R Schulz allegedly wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The Reply-To: header (or, more precisely, control over it) belongs to
> the originator of the mail, not to the list server or its administrator.
>
> Randall Schulz
Reply-To is often added by l
--- Randall R Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The Reply-To: header (or, more precisely, control over it) belongs to
> the originator of the mail, not to the list server or its administrator.
>
> Randall Schulz
Then how is it happening in cygwin-xfree
Hi,
The Reply-To: header (or, more precisely, control over it) belongs to
the originator of the mail, not to the list server or its administrator.
Randall Schulz
At 13:40 2003-06-03, Biju G C wrote:
cgf,
When I reply to any mail from cygwin list it is going to the actual sender
instead of
cgf,
When I reply to any mail from cygwin list it is going to the actual sender
instead of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
upon checking the header of the mail from the list i am not seeing
"Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]" line.
just like cygwin-xfree list can v added "Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTE
On Sun, Apr 06, 2003 at 11:38:44PM +, Gareth Pearce wrote:
>
>>>Regards,
>>>Gareth - cygwin nano packager.
>>>(PS: Waiting for cgf's supprised look - since nano-devel's Chris complied
>>>immediately - or at least is trying too...)
>>
>>I'm very gratified at the response and indicated as much in
(crossing to cygwin incase it might inspire someone)
> use nano; for the same reason the (webpage) nano binary uses PDcurses
rather than
> ncurses so no termcap files are needed. I think the cygwin provided
> version of nano is far superior as things like spell check would
> actually work,
This wo
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf
> Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--8<--
> 1. Those that want replies to their email redirected to the list only
> (cygwin at cygwin dot com) should set their "Reply-To" field.
>
> 2. Those who reply to email
On Thu, 6 Mar 2003, Hannu E K Nevalainen (garbage mail) wrote:
> > Yeah, why? I'm obviously on this mailing list, since I answered your
> > question, so why did you decide to reply to me off list?
>
> Sorry for butting in... but I have been there myself.
>
> IMO
ted to the list only
(cygwin at cygwin dot com) should set their "Reply-To" field.
2. Those who reply to email with such a setting should not override it,
under penalty of flame.
End of line.
Larry
Original Message:
-
From: Hannu E K Nevalainen (garba
On Fri, 2003-03-07 at 07:03, Hannu E K Nevalainen (garbage mail) wrote:
>
> I have appended the headers of the message I replied to, for ref.
>
>
> Hmm...? After proofreading; These looks odd:
> --
> Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="iso-8859-1"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> --
> Yeah, why? I'm obviously on this mailing list, since I answered your
> question, so why did you decide to reply to me off list?
Sorry for butting in... but I have been there myself.
IMO there is one, not so obvious, maldefinition with at least
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
as it is toda
--- Begin Message ---
Well, if I run plain "ld"(with no emulation specified), in a
cygwin environment,
on a ".o" generated form "as", I get this error:
ld: PE operatios on non PE File.
thanx,
Deepa
Original message
>Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 10:10:45 -0500
>From: Christopher Faylor <[
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 01:26:39PM +0200, Pavel Rozenboim wrote:
>Is it possible to add Reply-To header to messages posted to the list?
No.
cgf
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: h
Hi,
Is it possible to add Reply-To header to messages posted to the list? It
will make reply to list messages easier. I already sent direct (off-list)
reply to someone by mistake.
Thanks,
Pavel.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting
On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 07:31:53PM +0100, raphael wrote:
>And dont forget to ask that people might ?To whom it might concern? instead
>of cryptic shortcuts like TWIMC.
Actually, as long as we're correcting people it is "To whom it may concern".
Using an acronym in a greeting is, IMO, no big deal
Raphael,
True.
I use very few acronyms (but a few years doing DARPA-funded work will do
that to you), but I do occasionally use that one. I usually figure that in
context it's either obvious or at least would force people to think a bit.
It's also immaterial to the content of the message.
Ra
On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 08:49:31AM -0700, Randall R Schulz wrote:
> TWIMC,
>
> When you post to this list (or any list, of course), please use subject
> headers that are descriptive of the question you are asking.
>
> Subject headers such as "Beginner's Question," "Newbie Needs Help" or, god
>
TWIMC,
When you post to this list (or any list, of course), please use subject
headers that are descriptive of the question you are asking.
Subject headers such as "Beginner's Question," "Newbie Needs Help" or, god
forbid, "Question" are singularly unhelpful in describing the content of
the q
On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 09:23:44PM -, Trash wrote:
>
>Your message :-
> "Re: OT: possible project/research project" on Wed, 20 Mar 2002 11:46:59 -0500
>has been trashed.
>
>All e-mail from you has been barred permanently from being received by
>any e-mail addresses at this site - please take
Your message :-
"Re: cron usage..." on Wed, 20 Mar 2002 13:00:31 -0800
has been trashed.
All e-mail from you has been barred permanently from
being received by any e-mail addresses at this site -
please take your mailing lists to which I have never
subscribed and put them elsewhere.
--
Un
Your message :-
"Re: OT: possible project/research project" on Wed, 20 Mar 2002 11:46:59 -0500
has been trashed.
All e-mail from you has been barred permanently from
being received by any e-mail addresses at this site -
please take your spam and numerous mailing list to
which I have never
===
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> The have both been bosted to one of the cygwin lists in the last
.p
Rob
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug repor
- Original Message -
From: "Jochen Küpper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Gerrit> I would prefer if the listserver would manage this and rewrite
> Gerrit> the Reply-To Header regardless who is writing, so it points
> Gerrit> always to the list.
>
> That i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 8 Dec 2001 13:17:26 +0100 Gerrit P Haase wrote:
Gerrit> I would prefer if the listserver would manage this and rewrite
Gerrit> the Reply-To Header regardless who is writing, so it points
Gerrit> always to the list.
That is not what
99 matches
Mail list logo
