Re: Repeatable crash with CVS version of cygwin1 DLL

2004-02-20 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 10:02:38AM -0600, Cliff Geschke wrote: >Now you are making me wonder if RTEMS should be using sigsetjmp/siglongjmp. I >am not trying to become an RTEMS developer. Saving/restoring the signal mask would help would not help with this in any way. cgf -- Unsubscribe info:

Re: Repeatable crash with CVS version of cygwin1 DLL

2004-02-20 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 11:47:24AM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: >For instance, try the attached program on linux and you'll get a SEGV >because returning after the foo does not go to the right place. ^^^ longjmp -- Unsubscribe info:

Re: Repeatable crash with CVS version of cygwin1 DLL

2004-02-20 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 10:02:38AM -0600, Cliff Geschke wrote: >Are you trying to tell me that I can only call setjmp from the main >program? I don't recall saying that. What I'm saying is that longjmp is always supposed to be jumping to a location earlier in the call stack. >I don't know what m

Re: Repeatable crash with CVS version of cygwin1 DLL

2004-02-20 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Feb 20 10:02, Cliff Geschke wrote: > What!! > > Are you trying to tell me that I can only call setjmp from the main program? No, he's trying to tell you that you can't return from the function in which setjmp has been called and then from somewhere else call longjmp. That won't work. That's

RE: Repeatable crash with CVS version of cygwin1 DLL

2004-02-20 Thread Cliff Geschke
, Christopher Faylor wrote: >On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 05:58:59PM -0600, Cliff Geschke wrote: >>>From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 12:05 AM >>>Subject: Re: Repeatable crash with CVS version of cygwin1 DLL >>>

Re: Repeatable crash with CVS version of cygwin1 DLL

2004-02-19 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 07:10:02PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: >On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 05:58:59PM -0600, Cliff Geschke wrote: >>>From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 12:05 AM >>>Subject: Re: Repeatable crash w

Re: Repeatable crash with CVS version of cygwin1 DLL

2004-02-19 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 05:58:59PM -0600, Cliff Geschke wrote: >>From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 12:05 AM >>Subject: Re: Repeatable crash with CVS version of cygwin1 DLL >> >>On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 11:03:21PM -0

RE: Repeatable crash with CVS version of cygwin1 DLL

2004-02-19 Thread Cliff Geschke
>From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 12:05 AM >Subject: Re: Repeatable crash with CVS version of cygwin1 DLL > >On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 11:03:21PM -0600, Cliff Geschke wrote: >>I have tried the latest update from CVS. Still

Re: Repeatable crash with CVS version of cygwin1 DLL

2004-02-18 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 11:03:21PM -0600, Cliff Geschke wrote: >I have tried the latest update from CVS. Still crashes, but stackptr >does not go out-of-bounds. At some point, _sigbe tries to ret with the >top of stack ($esp) value set to 0. > >Some additional data points: > >1. I moved the test

RE: Repeatable crash with CVS version of cygwin1 DLL

2004-02-18 Thread Cliff Geschke
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2004 4:43 PM Subject: Re: Repeatable crash with CVS version of cygwin1 DLL On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 10:31:03AM -0600, Cliff Geschke wrote: >cygwin-1.5.7-1 >cygwin-SPLAT-cygwin-BOP-com Please, avoid putting raw email addresses in messages. They

Re: Repeatable crash with CVS version of cygwin1 DLL

2004-02-18 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 10:31:03AM -0600, Cliff Geschke wrote: >cygwin-1.5.7-1 >cygwin-SPLAT-cygwin-BOP-com Please, avoid putting raw email addresses in messages. They serve no purpose and are spambot fodder. >After doing what you asked, the crash still occurs, but is somewhat >different. Here