Re: wtf? rxvt.exe

2011-09-16 Thread Charles Wilson
On 9/16/2011 2:36 PM, J.V. wrote: > I had an rxvt.bat that I had used for some time, now it won't work. > > What changed? /usr/share/doc/Cygwin/rxvt.README > Also when I use the switch: -e /usr/bin/bash it takes forever to open. Sounds like a bash problem, not rxvt. > It looks like rxvt has c

Re: WTF & NEW acronyms Was: Re: Making package installation default

2010-04-04 Thread Chris Sutcliffe
Hi Lee, > Is anyone maintaining WTF? That would be me, but... > Would anyone object to my changing the nature of WTF, so that it > automatically updates it's database from the OLOCA web page? (in Perl) > Rather than requiring a re-release each time the DB changes. If you would like to take it o

Re: WTF/database still needs updating

2009-04-16 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Apr 15 13:11, Lee D.Rothstein wrote: > --On Wednesday, April 15, 2009, Owen Rees noted: > > >--On Wednesday, April 15, 2009 09:03:57 -0400 Lee D. Rothstein wrote: > > > >> ISHFRTT not in WTF database. > > > >It is the first-person form of YSHFRTT (which is in OLOCA). > > > > YSHFRTT is not in th

Re: WTF/database still needs updating

2009-04-15 Thread Lee D.Rothstein
YSHFRTT is not in the 'wtf' database which means, 'wtf'' needs to be 're-rolled'? --On Wednesday, April 15, 2009, Owen Rees noted: >--On Wednesday, April 15, 2009 09:03:57 -0400 Lee D. Rothstein wrote: > >> ISHFRTT not in WTF database. > >It is the first-person form of YSHFRTT (which is in OLOCA

Re: wtf

2004-03-30 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Mon, 29 Mar 2004, Clint Bennion wrote: > I was having fun with wtf after Igor mentioned it a bit ago. It is a > nice alternative for looking up those acronyms on the web site. > > I ran into a minor issue: > > In the os file the key/value for OpenBSD in file os is seperated by a > space instea

Re: wtf wtf

2003-11-03 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Mon, 3 Nov 2003, zzapper wrote: > Shankar Unni > > > >> What I really want to know is why there are so few acronyms in WTF, > >> does anyone have bigger datafiles?? > > > >Because as distributed, it was not intended to be a universal acronym > >dictionary (which could run to millions of acrony

Re: wtf wtf

2003-11-03 Thread zzapper
Shankar Unni > >> What I really want to know is why there are so few acronyms in WTF, >> does anyone have bigger datafiles?? > >Because as distributed, it was not intended to be a universal acronym >dictionary (which could run to millions of acronyms). > >WTF has generally been used to expand acr

Re: wtf wtf

2003-11-03 Thread Shankar Unni
zzapper wrote: > What I really want to know is why there are so few acronyms in WTF, > does anyone have bigger datafiles?? Because as distributed, it was not intended to be a universal acronym dictionary (which could run to millions of acronyms). WTF has generally been used to expand acronyms fo

Re: wtf wtf

2003-11-03 Thread zzapper
On Mon, 3 Nov 2003 13:24:11 -, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Have you tried typing 'man man' (without the quotes) ? ? ? I think you misunderstand my question . the WTF MAN page contained no examples, that would have saved a 1000 words.BTW I've been using unix since 1984. What I really want to

RE: wtf wtf

2003-11-03 Thread kevin.lawton
Have you tried typing 'man man' (without the quotes) ? ? ? -Original Message- From: zzapper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 02 November 2003 12:10 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: wtf wtf Why are MAN pages often so useless when you dont understand the basics, ie when the concept is

Re: wtf missing ootb?

2003-09-09 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Tue, 9 Sep 2003, Lapo Luchini wrote: > Not exactly a OLOCA issue... but seems strange that it's unknown to the > other list 0_O > > Lapo Lapo, Thanks for the report. I'll add it to the OLOCA as well, and it should appear in 0.0.4-5 RSN (unless there's a new upstream release in the meantime).

Re: wtf 0.0.4-3 can segfault

2003-09-04 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, Frédéric L. W. Meunier wrote: > Example: Move /usr/share/wtf/%OLOCA and type anything from that > file: > > $ wtf CGF > Missing file /usr/share/wtf/%OLOCA > Segmentation fault (core dumped) > > Is this expected ? It also segfaulted on Linux. Frédéric, Thanks for the bug repor

Re: wtf 0.0.4-2 - Segmentation fault (core dumped)

2003-08-29 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Fri, 29 Aug 2003, Cary Jamison wrote: > "Igor Pechtchanski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > > ... > > Pure coincidence! Drat, am I the only one who now regrets the fact that > > "vi" comes alphabetically after "emacs"? ;-) > > Try xemacs! That's a variant

Re: wtf 0.0.4-2 - Segmentation fault (core dumped)

2003-08-29 Thread Cary Jamison
"Igor Pechtchanski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > ... > Pure coincidence! Drat, am I the only one who now regrets the fact that > "vi" comes alphabetically after "emacs"? ;-) Try xemacs! -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Prob

Re: wtf 0.0.4-2 - Segmentation fault (core dumped)

2003-08-29 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Fri, 29 Aug 2003, Hughes, Bill wrote: > Running wtf 0.0.4-2 on cygwin 1.3.22(0.78/3/2) under Windows 2000,looking > for an acronym which is not in a database gives me an error of "Segmentation > fault (core dumped)" if the unrecognised acronym is 'susea' or later. > I.E. a search for 'a' to 'su