Re: updatedb broken as of findutils 4.8.0-1 due to bigram.exe no longer being provided

2021-08-29 Thread Brian Inglis
On 2021-08-29 06:06, Dan Harkless wrote: On 8/29/2021 4:02 AM, Hans-Bernhard Bröker wrote: Am 28.08.2021 um 18:23 schrieb Dan Harkless: Looks like it's because in findutils 4.8.0-1, the bigram.exe program is no longer provided, but the /usr/bin/updatedb script (still) depends on it being there

Re: updatedb broken as of findutils 4.8.0-1 due to bigram.exe no longer being provided

2021-08-29 Thread Dan Harkless
On 8/29/2021 4:02 AM, Hans-Bernhard Bröker wrote: Am 28.08.2021 um 18:23 schrieb Dan Harkless: Looks like it's because in findutils 4.8.0-1, the bigram.exe program is no longer provided, but the /usr/bin/updatedb script (still) depends on it being there: [...] + for binary in $find

Re: updatedb broken as of findutils 4.8.0-1 due to bigram.exe no longer being provided

2021-08-29 Thread Hans-Bernhard Bröker
Am 28.08.2021 um 18:23 schrieb Dan Harkless: Looks like it's because in findutils 4.8.0-1, the bigram.exe program is no longer provided, but the /usr/bin/updatedb script (still) depends on it being there:     [...]     + for binary in $find $frcode $bigram $code     + checkbinary /usr/l

Re: updatedb broken as of findutils 4.8.0-1 due to bigram.exe no longer being provided

2021-08-28 Thread Dan Harkless
On 8/28/2021 9:15 AM, Dan Harkless wrote: [...] Sorry for the Webmail-mangled spacing in that last message. Trying again here: Howdy.  Quick bug to report that I was surprised not to be able to find prior discussion of.  My nightly updatedb job stopped working after 2021-08-03, but I'd been

Re: updatedb broken

2006-03-21 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Steve Kelem on 3/21/2006 5:29 PM: > > I'm having trouble running updatedb. I've tried findutils-4.2.27-1 and > findutils-4.3.0-1. > When I run updatedb manually, I get the message: > updatedb needs to be able to execute /usr/lib/lapack/f

Re: updatedb broken [attn: lapack maintainer]

2006-03-21 Thread James R. Phillips
The lapack maintainer would be me. >That's because /etc/profile.d/lapack.sh is polluting the namespace with >BINDIR=/usr/lib/lapack Hm, you are correct. This is not purposeful, but inadvertent. I did not note carefully that the script is being sourced, so that modifications to commonly used env

Re: updatedb broken [attn: lapack maintainer]

2006-03-21 Thread Eric Blake
Eric Blake byu.net> writes: > In the meantime, as a workaround, you can do 'unset $BINDIR' prior > to running updatedb. Make that 'unset BINDIR'. My proofreading isn't very good today :) -- Eric Blake -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports:

Re: updatedb broken [attn: lapack maintainer]

2006-03-21 Thread Eric Blake
Steve Kelem elementcxi.com> writes: > > I'm having trouble running updatedb. I've tried findutils-4.2.27-1 and > findutils-4.3.0-1. > When I run updatedb manually, I get the message: > updatedb needs to be able to execute /usr/lib/lapack/find, but cannot. > The directory /usr/lib/lapack contai