Re: texconfig and ed

2002-01-20 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 02:12:44PM +0100, Thomas Esser wrote: >> Sorry forgot to send the modified texconfig. >> In any case a better solution to the "ed" missing >> problem is to include in /usr/bin the following >> shell script, with the name "ed" : >> >> #!/bin/sh >> vim -e $1 $2 $3 $

Re: texconfig and ed

2002-01-20 Thread Thomas Esser
> Sorry forgot to send the modified texconfig. > In any case a better solution to the "ed" missing > problem is to include in /usr/bin the following > shell script, with the name "ed" : > > #!/bin/sh > vim -e $1 $2 $3 $4 $5 $6 > exit > > Don't forget to make it executable >

Re: texconfig and ed

2002-01-05 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 03:36:15AM +0100, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: >I fetched the sources from GNU and build it because it is needed >really often. Builds straight forward OOTB. >[snip] >It isn't distributed with Cygwin, but I think it should. Me too. It is an oversight that it is *not* distribut

Re: texconfig and ed

2002-01-05 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Hallo Jerome, Am 2002-01-05 um 23:50 schriebst du: > is it your `ed' or a one distributed within Cygwin ? I fetched the sources from GNU and build it because it is needed really often. Builds straight forward OOTB. > As far I remember `ed' compiled without difficulties, > and apparently ther

Re: texconfig and ed

2002-01-05 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Bonjour, is it your `ed' or a one distributed within Cygwin ? As far I remember `ed' compiled without difficulties, and apparently there is no `ed' package: in which cygwin tarball is `ed' distributed ? Thanks, Jerome BENOIT "Gerrit P. Haase" wrote: > > Hallo Rodrigo, > > Am 2002-01-05 um

Re: texconfig and ed

2002-01-05 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Hallo Rodrigo, Am 2002-01-05 um 12:24 schriebst du: > About the question of E. Reiner: > texconfig and ed > texconfig requires ed that is not inside cygwin. $ which ed /bin/ed Maybe someone should volunteer and contribute a `port' of `ed';) Gerrit -- =^..^=