On Fri, 2011-07-29 at 22:23 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Jul 29 13:30, Eric Blake wrote:
> > Is there any specific reason why socklen_t on cygwin is int instead
> > of uint32_t, like it is on Linux?
>
> Other than history? No, I don't think so. But I also don't think
> it's worth the effo
On Jul 29 13:30, Eric Blake wrote:
> Is there any specific reason why socklen_t on cygwin is int instead
> of uint32_t, like it is on Linux?
Other than history? No, I don't think so. But I also don't think
it's worth the effort. All the underlying Windows functions typically
use int rather than
2 matches
Mail list logo
