Re: setup.exe problem in wine

2017-07-03 Thread Richard Z
On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 07:45:34AM -0700, Dan Kegel wrote: > > Well, shoot. So I tried again with WINEDEBUG=+relay to get a log of > system calls, > Wading through the noise, I saw two interesting things: > > 0030:Starting process L"C:\\cygwin64\\bin\\bash.exe" (entryproc=0x100401000) > ... > 00

Re: setup.exe problem in wine

2017-07-01 Thread Dan Kegel
On Sat, Jul 1, 2017 at 4:31 AM, Richard Z wrote: > strangely WINEDEBUG does nothing for me. Did you remember to export it? - Dan -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe

Re: setup.exe problem in wine

2017-07-01 Thread Richard Z
On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 07:45:34AM -0700, Dan Kegel wrote: thanks for the tipps and trying.. > There were lots of complaints from setup.exe (not wine) of the sort > AddAccessAllowedAceEx(C:\cygwin64/etc/setup, group) failed: 1337 > but those can probably be ignored. same here. > Default install

Re: setup.exe problem in wine

2017-06-30 Thread Dan Kegel
On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 5:44 AM, Richard Z wrote: >> read in various places that it should work, but I get >> "Cygwin is not supported on this Windows version" running >> from both wineconsole or bash. > > got somewhat farther with "--allow-unsupported-windows" > and also need "--site" because mir

Re: setup.exe problem in wine

2017-06-30 Thread Richard Z
On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 01:26:19PM +0200, Richard Z wrote: > Hi, > > read in various places that it should work, but I get > "Cygwin is not supported on this Windows version" running > from both wineconsole or bash. got somewhat farther with "--allow-unsupported-windows" and also need "--site" be

Re: Setup.exe problem: double-click selects wrong version

2005-01-27 Thread Fred Kulack
On 01/27/2005 at 10:32:51 AM, "Max Bowsher" wrote: Why should setup be any different from other applications? Can anyone quote any existing single-clickable UI components that de-duplicate double clicks? --- end of excerpt --- The first ones that come to mind are pretty obvious: Windows desktop

RE: Setup.exe problem: double-click selects wrong version

2005-01-27 Thread Dave Korn
> -Original Message- > From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Bertalan Fodor > Sent: 27 January 2005 14:33 > I think double-click should work as one single click in this case, > because the user gets no feedback that he've done something > other than he wanted to. But what did you *want* to

Re: Setup.exe problem: double-click selects wrong version

2005-01-27 Thread Max Bowsher
Fred Kulack wrote: I think double-click should work as one single click in this case, because the user gets no feedback that he've done something other than he wanted to. I think that's a perfectly reasonable argument to have. If its important to the maintainers, we'll get indication of that now th

Re: Setup.exe problem: double-click selects wrong version

2005-01-27 Thread Fred Kulack
> I think double-click should work as one single click in this case, > because the user gets no feedback that he've done something other than > he wanted to. I think that's a perfectly reasonable argument to have. If its important to the maintainers, we'll get indication of that now that it ha

Re: Setup.exe problem: double-click selects wrong version

2005-01-27 Thread Bertalan Fodor
I think double-click should work as one single click in this case, because the user gets no feedback that he've done something other than he wanted to. This is a bug in the user's understanding of the interface, I think. Max. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple P

Re: Setup.exe problem: double-click selects wrong version

2005-01-27 Thread Max Bowsher
Bertalan Fodor wrote: Hello, I've found that when a user double-clicks on a package, it is interpreted as two single clicks, so it is not the current version that gets selected, but the previous. This is a bug in the user's understanding of the interface, I think. Max. -- Unsubscribe info: ht

Re: setup.exe problem

2002-05-14 Thread Sam Edge
Harold L Hunt wrote in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 14 May 2002 16:12:51 EDT: > The reason I chided you is that I happen to have inside knowledge that this > is a change ('problem') with the openbox package, not with setup.exe. Búgger! My mistake. Apologies. -- Sam Edge -- Unsubscribe inf

Re: setup.exe problem

2002-05-14 Thread Harold L Hunt
Sam, The reason I chided you is that I happen to have inside knowledge that this is a change ('problem') with the openbox package, not with setup.exe. Version 0.99.1-3 of openbox installs to /usr/X11R6 (as many users requested) rather than /usr as used in previous versions of openbox. Thus,

Re: setup.exe problem

2002-05-14 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 08:41:43PM +0100, Sam Edge wrote: >Harold L Hunt wrote in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >on Tue, 14 May 2002 14:56:09 EDT: >>You're complaining about openbox, which is a Cygwin/XFree86 package. >>You know better than to send this inquiry to the Cygwin list > >As I explained, I suspec

Re: setup.exe problem

2002-05-14 Thread Sam Edge
Harold L Hunt wrote in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 14 May 2002 14:56:09 EDT: > You're complaining about openbox, which is a Cygwin/XFree86 package. > You know better than to send this inquiry to the Cygwin list As I explained, I suspect the problem is with setup.exe since the package archive f

Re: setup.exe problem

2002-05-14 Thread Harold L Hunt
Sam, You're complaining about openbox, which is a Cygwin/XFree86 package. You know better than to send this inquiry to the Cygwin list; this discussion belongs on the Cygwin/XFree86 list, where I have redirected it. Harold Sam Edge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > I've just updated fro openbox-0

RE: Setup.exe problem?

2002-05-02 Thread Robert Collins
> -Original Message- > From: Paul G. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 9:13 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Setup.exe problem? > > > Hi folks, > > Not sure if this is correct mailing list. It is. > Tried using latest version of setup.ex

Re: setup.exe problem - solved (final)

2002-03-27 Thread Jonas Eriksson
The problem were nVidia's desktop management program 'nview', or the way setup.exe opens the packages choice window. Anyhow, disabling nview made the process going fine. nview is an optional part of the new driver for Geforce graphics cards. Regards /Jonas >The problem is solved, partly. I used

Re: setup.exe problem - partly solved

2002-03-27 Thread Jonas Eriksson
The problem is solved, partly. I used another user on my win2000 and then it all worked fine. I have no idea what the difference is, except that the user that worked does not belong to the admin group. Cheers /Jonas Pavel Tsekov wrote: >Hello Jonas, > > >Wednesday, March 27, 2002, 9:04:51 AM,

Re: setup.exe problem

2002-03-27 Thread Jonas Eriksson
I have tried both "Install from Internet" and "Download from Internet". On next page I have used the default Local package directory and tried to specify my own. From the mirror-list I have choosen at least 5 different locations, same hanging result after downloading setup.ini. Previous attempt

Re: setup.exe problem

2002-03-27 Thread Ton van Overbeek
Jonas Eriksson wrote: > When I try to install Cygwin with the latest setup.exe (2.194.2.21) it > hangs after I have selected a mirror server to download from. It manages > to download setup.ini but them immediately comes up with the message > "This space intentionally left blank" and continues

Re: setup.exe problem

2002-03-27 Thread Pavel Tsekov
Hello Jonas, Wednesday, March 27, 2002, 9:04:51 AM, you wrote: Please, provide some more information on the choices you've made on the various pages of the setup program. JE> When I try to install Cygwin with the latest setup.exe (2.194.2.21) it JE> hangs after I have selected a mirror server