On 07/07/2024 03:46, Yang Yu Lin via Cygwin wrote:
When running setup on my device (Windows 11, connected with 2 screens
which use different DPI revolutions), the setup appears bluury on my
secondary screen (not on the primary screen).
Because current setup.exe.manifest just set the dpiAware ele
Thank you for your response about the shortcuts... And double-clicks (which
can be a ton when installing anew, as I figured).
> Doubleclick in "New" column toggles between "Skip" or "Keep" and the
> "preferred version". Ctrl+I selects the latter.and moves to the next row.
What if I don't need t
Hi,
Lavrentiev, Anton wrote
...
For new installations, it'd be great to have the most suitable (in most cases,
the most
recent) version shown as the first selection in all those pulldown version
lists in
the "New" columns. The logical order would be "the preferred (latest) version",
"the vers
Greetings, o lu!
Please don't top-post on this list.
>>>
>>> > It worked, but I dont understand on Windows
>>>
>>> If you have downloaded it into a directory mounted with "acl" option,
>>> POSIX behavior apply.
>> How does the acl option work? I ran it on a regular Windows directory (to
>> my kn
How does this acl option work? Im on Win 10 Home.
On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 9:10 AM o lu wrote:
> How does the acl option work? I ran it on a regular Windows directory (to
> my knowledge).
>
> Your english is fine.
>
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 4:20 AM Andrey Repin wrote:
>
>> Greetings, o lu!
>>
How does the acl option work? I ran it on a regular Windows directory (to
my knowledge).
Your english is fine.
On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 4:20 AM Andrey Repin wrote:
> Greetings, o lu!
>
> > It worked, but I dont understand on Windows
>
> If you have downloaded it into a directory mounted with "ac
Greetings, o lu!
> It worked, but I dont understand on Windows
If you have downloaded it into a directory mounted with "acl" option, POSIX
behavior apply.
--
With best regards,
Andrey Repin
Thursday, April 16, 2020 11:06:22
Sorry for my terrible english...
--
Problem reports: https://cy
It worked, but I dont understand on Windows
--
Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
On 2020-04-14 04:43, o lu via Cygwin wrote:
> When downloaded with cygwin wget
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 3:34 AM o lu wrote:
>> Windows cannot access the specified device, path, or file...
>> with latest setup.exe
Which:
https://cygwin.com/setup-x86_64.exe
or
https://cygwin.com/s
When downloaded with cygwin wget
On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 3:34 AM o lu wrote:
> Windows cannot access the specified device...
>
> Windows cannot access the specified device, path, or file with
> latest setup.exe
>
--
Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:
Brian,
All-volunteer. I understand that well, and have been using Cygwin for
a long long time.
The volunteers love what they do, and I try to be as respectful as
possible when suggesting changes, changes mean more work for them.
I'm satisfied with this thread.
Thanks Achim, Jon, and to any oth
On 2019-06-11 14:52, Keith Christian wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 12:39 PM Brian Inglis wrote:
>> On 2019-06-11 11:19, Achim Gratz wrote:
>>> Keith Christian writes:
Would the maintainers (Achim? Jon?) be willing to consider an option
box log errors to the setup.log file and "Skip no
Thanks for the feedback.
Even if a file were missing that might cause issues in a few
dependency chains, why not allow the install to continue?
Suppose a file was missing halfway through? Why stop the whole
install for the sake of a few missing files? Let the install continue
for those packages
On 2019-06-11 11:19, Achim Gratz wrote:
> Keith Christian writes:
>> Would the maintainers (Achim? Jon?) be willing to consider an option
>> box log errors to the setup.log file and "Skip non-fatal errors and
>> continue?"
>
> You'd first have to teach setup to distinguish between fatal and
> non
Keith Christian writes:
> Would the maintainers (Achim? Jon?) be willing to consider an option
> box log errors to the setup.log file and "Skip non-fatal errors and
> continue?"
You'd first have to teach setup to distinguish between fatal and
non-fatal errors. A missing package archive is always
Greetings, Keith Christian!
> Today I am reinstalling Cygwin to fix a DLL package, taking awhile but
> worth the wait (-: (-:
> Setup paused with a dialog to report a missing .xz file. I saw the
> error a half hour later.
> Would the maintainers (Achim? Jon?) be willing to consider an option
On 2019-06-11 05:27, Keith Christian wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 2:03 AM Henning wrote:
>> On 10/06/2019 23:41, Keith Christian wrote:
>>> Would the maintainers (Achim? Jon?) be willing to consider an option box
>>> log errors to the setup.log file and "Skip non-fatal errors and
>>> continue
And if this option is deemed worthy of implementation, add a command
line option for those who skip the GUI.
Thanks again.
On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 2:03 AM Henning wrote:
>
> On 10/06/2019 23:41, Keith Christian wrote:
> >
> > Would the maintainers (Achim? Jon?) be willing to consider an option
On 10/06/2019 23:41, Keith Christian wrote:
Would the maintainers (Achim? Jon?) be willing to consider an option
box log errors to the setup.log file and "Skip non-fatal errors and
continue?"
either this, or a prompt asking if the user wants to continue or abort.
Henning
--
Problem reports:
On Apr 16 09:19, Houder wrote:
> L.S.,
>
> Setup.exe writes "user defaults" to /etc/setup/setup.rc in the root
> directory. Among these user defaults (which should override program
> defaults) are "last-action" and "last-cache".
>
> last-cache is an alias for the Local Package Directory (abbrevia
Am 01.11.2018 um 17:37 schrieb John Doucette:
Hi all,
My current setup-x86 is version 2.893.
Cygwin is not installed yet, so I am running setup-x86.exe from within
PowerShell on Win7.
PS C:\> .\setup-x86.exe -V
PS C:\ > Cygwin setup 2.893
First I run setup to download all things Devel using:
On 11/1/2018 12:37 PM, John Doucette wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> My current setup-x86 is version 2.893.
> Cygwin is not installed yet, so I am running setup-x86.exe from within
> PowerShell on Win7.
>
> PS C:\> .\setup-x86.exe -V
> PS C:\ > Cygwin setup 2.893
>
> First I run setup to download all thi
On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 07:45:34AM -0700, Dan Kegel wrote:
>
> Well, shoot. So I tried again with WINEDEBUG=+relay to get a log of
> system calls,
> Wading through the noise, I saw two interesting things:
>
> 0030:Starting process L"C:\\cygwin64\\bin\\bash.exe" (entryproc=0x100401000)
> ...
> 00
On Sat, Jul 1, 2017 at 4:31 AM, Richard Z wrote:
> strangely WINEDEBUG does nothing for me.
Did you remember to export it?
- Dan
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe
On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 07:45:34AM -0700, Dan Kegel wrote:
thanks for the tipps and trying..
> There were lots of complaints from setup.exe (not wine) of the sort
> AddAccessAllowedAceEx(C:\cygwin64/etc/setup, group) failed: 1337
> but those can probably be ignored.
same here.
> Default install
On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 5:44 AM, Richard Z wrote:
>> read in various places that it should work, but I get
>> "Cygwin is not supported on this Windows version" running
>> from both wineconsole or bash.
>
> got somewhat farther with "--allow-unsupported-windows"
> and also need "--site" because mir
On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 01:26:19PM +0200, Richard Z wrote:
> Hi,
>
> read in various places that it should work, but I get
> "Cygwin is not supported on this Windows version" running
> from both wineconsole or bash.
got somewhat farther with "--allow-unsupported-windows"
and also need "--site" be
Greetings, Jérôme Bouat!
>> If you can't access the internet, how would you download anything
>> to your system?
> My organisation forbids the use of IE. The corporate web browser is Firefox.
Doesn't change the fact proxy settings are available in control panel.
>> What makes you think it i
thinking, so allow me a crazy thought. AFAIK, Cygwin's setup can't
use a HTTPS mirror [1]. Given the desire to move more and more web
traffic onto HTTPS, would an option to download through IE be a cheap
way to add HTTPS support to setup?
Would probably be easier to replace the existing plumbing
If you can't access the internet, how would you download anything
to your system?
My organisation forbids the use of IE. The corporate web browser is Firefox.
What makes you think it is using
IE's cache?
I just performed this simple test :
1. clear the IE disk cache
2. use Setup.exe in
On 2016-09-27 12:29, David Stacey wrote:
On 27/09/16 03:24, Linda Walsh wrote:
What makes you think it is downloaded into the IE disk cache? I
don't think it should be -- as AFAIK, it doesn't use IE to
download anything
setup using IE to do its downloading is a bad idea. But, that got me
thinki
On 27/09/16 03:24, Linda Walsh wrote:
What makes you think it is downloaded into the IE disk cache?
I don't think it should be -- as AFAIK, it doesn't use IE to download
anything
setup using IE to do its downloading is a bad idea. But, that got me
thinking, so allow me a crazy thought. AFAIK,
Jérôme Bouat wrote:
Hello,
I'm using cygwin on a thin desktop computer which has limited disk storage.
The network configuration of setup.exe relies on the proxy
auto-configuration script of IE.
---
Actually, it doesn't "rely" on it, it offers to
use whatever "IE" is set to instead of
On 2016-09-26 13:35, Jérôme Bouat wrote:
I'm using cygwin on a thin desktop computer which has limited disk
storage.
The network configuration of setup.exe relies on the proxy
auto-configuration script of IE.
To see your proxy config, try running:
$ wget -q -O - `ipconfig | \
sed '/^\s\+Connec
Hi,
On 08/09/16 22:59, Nellis, Kenneth wrote:
Just in case anyone's collecting change requests
against Setup.exe, here's a simple one that I'd
like to see:
All screens until the final screen display a "Next>"
button. Typically, after launching, I just click
this button until I get to the list o
On 2016-09-08 08:47, Brian Inglis wrote:
On 2016-09-08 06:59, Nellis, Kenneth wrote:
Just in case anyone's collecting change requests
against Setup.exe, here's a simple one that I'd
like to see:
All screens until the final screen display a "Next>"
button. Typically, after launching, I just clic
On 2016-09-08 06:59, Nellis, Kenneth wrote:
Just in case anyone's collecting change requests
against Setup.exe, here's a simple one that I'd
like to see:
All screens until the final screen display a "Next>"
button. Typically, after launching, I just click
this button until I get to the list of p
On 10/29/15, Marco Atzeri wrote:
>
>
> On 29/10/2015 20:53, Roger Pack wrote:
>> As a note, running this:
>>
>>
>> setup-x86.exe ^
>> --quiet-mode ^
>> --no-admin ^
>> --no-startmenu ^
>> --no-shortcuts ^
>> --no-desktop ^
>> --site http://mirrors.xmission.com/cygwin/ ^
>> --root %cd% ^
>> --packa
On 29/10/2015 20:53, Roger Pack wrote:
As a note, running this:
setup-x86.exe ^
--quiet-mode ^
--no-admin ^
--no-startmenu ^
--no-shortcuts ^
--no-desktop ^
--site http://mirrors.xmission.com/cygwin/ ^
--root %cd% ^
--packages ^
ed,curl,wget,subversion,texinfo,gcc-g++,bison,flex,cvs,yasm,auto
Following your suggestion solved my problems
On 22.10.2015 14:37, Ken Brown wrote:
On 10/22/2015 6:28 AM, Tom Axehult wrote:
I lost bash weeks ago and hence cygwin which I used to start from
Cywin.bat as
administrator, by the well known
bash --login -i
For reasons beyond me, I can run Xemacs
On 10/22/2015 6:28 AM, Tom Axehult wrote:
I lost bash weeks ago and hence cygwin which I used to start from Cywin.bat as
administrator, by the well known
bash --login -i
For reasons beyond me, I can run Xemacs and reach bash functionality from
(Tools/shell command) and thus produce cygcheck.
Usin
On Thu, 2015-10-15 at 17:04 -0600, om...@sdf.org wrote:
> Vim won't start after perfomring an update with the latest setup.exe. I do
> echo $? and it shows it exited with 127.
For future reference: https://cygwin.com/problems.html
> This person
> https://superuser.com/questions/859379/exit-code
From: Jon TURNEY
>
> It seems you are not using the right URL. Try
>
> -s "http://mirror.cs.vt.edu/pub/cygwin/cygwin/";
>
> This is what the link on https://cygwin.com/mirrors.html points to.
Hey, Jon, thanx! I'm in business. Not sure if/where that was documented.
FWIW, it appears that the w
Nellis, Kenneth xerox.com> writes:
> I currently run setup through a Windows shortcut that adds options
> -d -N to the standard command line. Being exposed recently to
> cygwinports, I was attempting to have separate shortcuts, one for
> regular cygwin and one for cygwinports.
No, if you use c
On 28/08/2015 15:42, Nellis, Kenneth wrote:
I appreciate the response and the provided script, but
the question remains whether I am doing something wrong
(and what!) or if setup.exe just isn't working as
expected (bug?).
Specifically, in the Target field of my shortcut's
properties, I have:
C:
I appreciate the response and the provided script, but
the question remains whether I am doing something wrong
(and what!) or if setup.exe just isn't working as
expected (bug?).
Specifically, in the Target field of my shortcut's
properties, I have:
C:\Users\knellis\Installers\Cygwin\setup-x86_64.
Greetings, Nellis, Kenneth!
> Dear Cygwin Users:
> I currently run setup through a Windows shortcut that adds options
> -d -N to the standard command line. Being exposed recently to
> cygwinports, I was attempting to have separate shortcuts,
Wasted effort.
> one for regular cygwin and one for
On Oct 30 17:46, Achim Gratz wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen writes:
> > Not stripped before compressing, actually. Fixed now.
>
> I once offered a Makefile patch to add a target to make stripped and
> compressed binaries. Cristopher didn't like it, but I could offer it
> again since I've kept it on a
Corinna Vinschen writes:
> Not stripped before compressing, actually. Fixed now.
I once offered a Makefile patch to add a target to make stripped and
compressed binaries. Cristopher didn't like it, but I could offer it
again since I've kept it on a local branch.
Regards,
Achim.
--
+<[Q+ Matri
On Oct 28 09:12, Achim Gratz wrote:
> Am 27.10.2014 um 23:40 schrieb Warren Young:
> >Why did setup.exe just get 7x larger, relative to 2.850?
>
> Not compressed by UPX, I suppose.
Not stripped before compressing, actually. Fixed now.
Thanks for the report, Warren.
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinsch
Am 27.10.2014 um 23:40 schrieb Warren Young:
Why did setup.exe just get 7x larger, relative to 2.850?
Not compressed by UPX, I suppose.
--
Achim.
(on the road :-)
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:
Greetings, Corinna Vinschen!
>> > So, if anybody wants to take a stab at setup and revamp it, feel free.
>> > The only requirements are, it should still be able to utilize the
>> > setup.ini file created on cygwin.com, it should still be able to work
>> > the mirror list provided by cygwin.com, an
On Aug 26 13:53, Andrey Repin wrote:
> > So, if anybody wants to take a stab at setup and revamp it, feel free.
> > The only requirements are, it should still be able to utilize the
> > setup.ini file created on cygwin.com, it should still be able to work
> > the mirror list provided by cygwin.com,
Greetings, Corinna Vinschen!
>> If you ask me, Setup is long overdue for a complete replacement.
>> It "don't have" so many things other package managers allow, that I don't
>> even
>> know, where to start. Meta dependencies? Suggestions? Virtual packages?
> The problem is not that we don't know
On Aug 26 05:35, Andrey Repin wrote:
> Greetings, Bjorn Kautler!
>
> > But first things first, it is Bjorn or Bjoern, not Bjorn. :-)
>
> Apology. My current locale does not include western diacritics.
>
> > Now I only wanted to update the git packages, so I selected "Keep" in
> > the upper right
Greetings, Bjorn Kautler!
> But first things first, it is Bjorn or Bjoern, not Bjorn. :-)
Apology. My current locale does not include western diacritics.
> Now I only wanted to update the git packages, so I selected "Keep" in
> the upper right corner,
That's the worst thing you could possible d
Hm,
now that's interesting.
But first things first, it is Björn or Bjoern, not Bjorn. :-)
Now to the interesting part.
If I call setup.exe like the following:
setup-cygwin.exe --site
ftp://mirrors.kernel.org/sourceware/cygwinports/ --site
ftp://ftp.hawo.stw.uni-erlangen.de/cygwin/ --only-site -
Greetings, Bjorn Kautler!
> I usually start setup.exe like "setup.exe -K
> http://cygwinports.org/ports.gpg"; and select the cygwinports mirror
> and a "normal" mirror in the mirror selection page to have the
> packages from both mirrors readily available, selectable and
> updatable.
> Unfortunat
On 08/25/2014 01:33 PM, Björn Kautler wrote:
Hi,
I usually start setup.exe like "setup.exe -K
http://cygwinports.org/ports.gpg"; and select the cygwinports mirror
and a "normal" mirror in the mirror selection page to have the
packages from both mirrors readily available, selectable and
updatable
On 4/5/2014 9:25 PM, Matthew Langston wrote:
The "Select Pacakge" window shows "No packages found." when I run setup.exe version
2.844 (32 bit) and choose the option to “Install from Local Directory" even though there are 167
.tar.bz2 files in my local directory.
These are the options I choose
Michael Ryan writes:
> I'm trying to verify the signatures on the latest setup.exe files and I'm
> finding that they don't match:
>
> $ gpg --verify setup-x86.exe.sig
> gpg: Signature made Fri 13 Dec 2013 17:24:37 GMT using DSA key ID 676041BA
> gpg: BAD signature from "Cygwin "
> $ gpg --verify s
On 28/01/2014 19:19, Chris J. Breisch wrote:
BGINFO4X wrote:
Hello everybody,
What is the recommende way to install ONLY one pakcage(bash for
example) with the GUI?
What I do is: All -> Uninstall , then check for the package that I
want: Base -> Bash -> Install
If I do in this manner, I
On 1/29/2014 1:10 PM, BGINFO4X wrote:
It seems like "base category" is "like a dependency" of bash ... ,
which can be bypassed with the setupGUI.
Close but not quite. "Base" is a category containing packages,
including bash, that is installed by default.
--
Larry
_
> On 1/29/2014 11:24 AM, Achim Gratz wrote:
>>
>> Chris J. Breisch breisch.org> writes:
>>>
>>> No, I don't agree with that statement. I'd be more inclined to believe
>>> that it's a bug in the command-line interface that doesn't allow you to
>>> do what the GUI does.
>>
>>
>> You can disagree all
On 1/29/2014 11:24 AM, Achim Gratz wrote:
Chris J. Breisch breisch.org> writes:
No, I don't agree with that statement. I'd be more inclined to believe
that it's a bug in the command-line interface that doesn't allow you to
do what the GUI does.
You can disagree all you want, the source of set
Chris J. Breisch breisch.org> writes:
> No, I don't agree with that statement. I'd be more inclined to believe
> that it's a bug in the command-line interface that doesn't allow you to
> do what the GUI does.
You can disagree all you want, the source of setup makes it pretty clear
that all pack
Achim Gratz wrote:
They are, if you don't fiddle with a checkbox that you shouldn't be able to
toggle in the first place. In other words it's a bug in the GUI that you
are able to bypass the install of some Base packages.
No, I don't agree with that statement. I'd be more inclined to believe
BGINFO4X kztsoftware.com> writes:
> On my humble opinion, If I check ONLY bash with GUI, and I use the
> command-line "setup-x86.exe -g -o --no-desktop --no-shortcuts
> --no-startmenu --local-install %CYGWINALOCALPACKAGES% --quiet-mode
> --root %CYGWINADMINDIR% --packages bash" both results should
2014-01-29 Chris J. Breisch :
> BGINFO4X wrote:
>>
>> On my humble opinion, If I check ONLY bash with GUI, and I use the
>> command-line "setup-x86.exe -g -o --no-desktop --no-shortcuts
>> --no-startmenu --local-install %CYGWINALOCALPACKAGES% --quiet-mode
>> --root %CYGWINADMINDIR% --packages bash"
BGINFO4X wrote:
On my humble opinion, If I check ONLY bash with GUI, and I use the
command-line "setup-x86.exe -g -o --no-desktop --no-shortcuts
--no-startmenu --local-install %CYGWINALOCALPACKAGES% --quiet-mode
--root %CYGWINADMINDIR% --packages bash" both results should be the
same.
No. You
> BGINFO4X writes:
>> I did it, and the results are diferent.
>
> Because you made it so.
>
>> I attach on the email both setup results: with commandline and with GUI.
>
> So you managed to trick setup into not installing some Base packages in
> the GUI. If you wouldn't have done that, you'd hav
BGINFO4X writes:
> I did it, and the results are diferent.
Because you made it so.
> I attach on the email both setup results: with commandline and with GUI.
So you managed to trick setup into not installing some Base packages in
the GUI. If you wouldn't have done that, you'd have installed t
BGINFO4X wrote:
Hello everybody,
What is the recommende way to install ONLY one pakcage(bash for
example) with the GUI?
What I do is: All -> Uninstall , then check for the package that I
want: Base -> Bash -> Install
If I do in this manner, I obtain less packages than installing bash
from t
On 28/01/2014 15:41, BGINFO4X wrote:
Hello everybody,
What is the recommende way to install ONLY one pakcage(bash for
example) with the GUI?
What I do is: All -> Uninstall , then check for the package that I
want: Base -> Bash -> Install
better to test from scratch in an empty directory, to
>I notice that every time I run setup.exe, my soft link gets removed and a new
>profile is created for me the next time I open a Cygwin terminal.
I can confirm a similar issue in setup-x86_64. However, the soft link for /home
is not actually removed - it remains side-by-side with the new /home d
Greetings, Warren Young!
>>> My current solution is to just mount it in fstab with the following line:
>>>
>>>c:/Users /home ntfs binary,posix=0,nouser
>>
>> Alternatively, you can set HOME in your
>> Windows environment to point to the directory you want as your home.
> Or, change the second
On 9/19/2013 19:15, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
On 9/19/2013 12:16 PM, Rob Siklos wrote:
My current solution is to just mount it in fstab with the following line:
c:/Users /home ntfs binary,posix=0,nouser
Alternatively, you can set HOME in your
Windows environment to point to the directory
On 9/19/2013 12:16 PM, Rob Siklos wrote:
Background:
I wanted my /home directory to point to c:\Users rather than the
out-of-the-box home directory created by cygwin. In order to accomplish
this, I deleted the existing home folder and created a soft link mapping
/home to /cygdrive/c/Users.
Thi
RiOk, thanks Marco (grazie :-))
Now I have solved. I have removed (renamed) the file setup.rc in
/etc/setup and it works again.
Sandro
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
U
Risposta al messaggio di marco atzeri :
have you downloaded the latest setup or you are using an old copy ?
I have the latest version, I have downloaded it yesterday:
C:\cygwin>Starting cygwin install, version 2.774
and it worked fine until I have uninstalled some packages and rebooted
my
Il 7/5/2013 9:25 PM, gialloporpora ha scritto:
Dear all,
I have the same problem reported in this topic:
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2008-03/msg00259.html
any time I start setup.exe (I need to update some packages) I have this
error message:
>
> Microsoft Visual C++ Runtime Library
> Runtim
Yaakov (Cygwin/X) sent the following at Monday, June 17, 2013 7:17 PM
>On 2013-06-17 18:13, Chloe wrote:
>> But it will run if I double click it from Explorer. I have
>> execute permissions. What is wrong?
>
>Due to UAC Installer Detection, setup.exe requires Admin permissions
>in order to run, b
On 2013-06-17 18:13, Chloe wrote:
But it will run if I double click it from Explorer. I have execute
permissions. What is wrong?
Due to UAC Installer Detection, setup.exe requires Admin permissions in
order to run, but bash doesn't know that. Use cygstart
/path/to/setup.exe to work around th
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 4:13 PM, Chloe wrote:
> But it will run if I double click it from Explorer. I have execute
> permissions. What is wrong?
Does
cmd /c setup.exe
work?
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:
On 17 May 2013 14:10, David Balažic wrote:
> Hi!
>
> If I start Setup.exe v2.774 on a PC where cygwin is already installed
> and I select to install new package (not yet installed), then the
> Pending view only shows this selected package and misses all the other
> pending packages (they would be u
hi,
patch attached.
What are the chances to get it into official setup release?
Cheers,
Pawel
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 6:58 PM, Pawel Jasinski wrote:
> hi,
>
> does anybody use cntlm proxy with cygwin setup.exe?
> I have tried it and looks a bit strange.
> First of all, cntlm proxy with browser w
On Jul 20 08:53, Paul Maier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> setup.exe brings hundreds of identical popups with error message:
>
> bash.exe:
> The application could not be started (0xc00d). *)
>
> All the .exe files are there in the bin folder, but when I double click on
> bash.exe or any other .exe,
> I
On 11/9/2011 11:43 PM, Ryan Johnson wrote:
Hi all,
There's a somewhat annoying behavior in setup.exe when installing
packages in 'keep' mode: all dependencies selected by things which would
have been installed in 'Curr' mode still try to download. Often I can
tell that they're spurious and just
On 11/9/2011 11:43 PM, Ryan Johnson wrote:
Hi all,
There's a somewhat annoying behavior in setup.exe when installing
packages in 'keep' mode: all dependencies selected by things which would
have been installed in 'Curr' mode still try to download. Often I can
tell that they're spurious and just
On 11/9/2011 5:43 PM, Ryan Johnson wrote:
There's a somewhat annoying behavior in setup.exe when installing
packages in 'keep' mode: all dependencies selected by things which would
have been installed in 'Curr' mode still try to download. Often I can
It's a setup.hint "bug". While setup.exe do
Andrew Schulman sent the following at Wednesday, October 05, 2011 12:01 PM
>I run setup unattended as e.g.
>
>setup.exe --quiet-mode --packages aria2,atool,autoconf,...
>
>This works great, except for one thing: There are some packages for
>which the "current" versions are broken, at least for me,
> >There are some packages for which
> >the "current" versions are broken, at least for me, so I want to keep the
> >"prev" or some other already-installed version of the package. Is there a
> >way to specify in the setup invocation that I want a particular version of
> >a particular package?
>
>
On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 12:00:43PM -0400, Andrew Schulman wrote:
>I run setup unattended as e.g.
>
>setup.exe --quiet-mode --packages aria2,atool,autoconf,...
>
>This works great, except for one thing: There are some packages for which
>the "current" versions are broken, at least for me, so I want
> I think it would be entirely reasonable to record the version you
> built against as the minimum requirement, as you couldn't be expected
> to test against older libraries as well. Wanting to use latest Unison
> with an old Cygwin DLL is a case of having your cake and eating it,
> it's just that
On 1 March 2011 14:04, Andrew Schulman wrote:
>> >> Which is the problem: the unison command was compiled against a newer
>> >> cygwin1.dll than yours.
>> >
>> > To be fair, setup.exe ought to be able to resolve or warn about such
>> > version dependencies. Unfortunately the infrastructure for that
On 3/1/2011 1:46 PM, Andy Koppe wrote:
Good idea, although that would entail unnecessary (and unwanted)
updates, for example, the Cygwin DLL would get updated whatever
package you installed, even if the package was built years ago.
Indeed and upgrading Cygwin itself is the very thing I was tryi
> >> Which is the problem: the unison command was compiled against a newer
> >> cygwin1.dll than yours.
> >
> > To be fair, setup.exe ought to be able to resolve or warn about such
> > version dependencies. Unfortunately the infrastructure for that isn't
> > in place, as it would require version r
On 1 March 2011 10:57, Matthias Andree wrote:
> Am 01.03.2011 08:20, schrieb Andy Koppe:
>> On 28 February 2011 19:52, Matthias Andree wrote:
>
>>> Which is the problem: the unison command was compiled against a newer
>>> cygwin1.dll than yours.
>>
>> To be fair, setup.exe ought to be able to resol
* From: Greg Chicares
* To: cygwin at cygwin dot com
* Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2010 14:23:02 +
* Subject: Re: setup.exe thinks it has no internet
* References: <01cb8898$8735d610$95a182...@covici.
On 2010-11-20 09:51Z, John Covici wrote:
> Hi. I am trying to install Cygwin on a vmware fusion virtual machine and
> unlike any other program on the vm the setup.exe thinks it has no internet,
> so it won't download the mirrors list nor if I type in one by hand will it
> get any information.
htt
1 - 100 of 843 matches
Mail list logo
