On Apr 8 16:40, Steven Penny wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 5:17 AM, Steven Penny wrote:
> > I upgraded to the new Cygwin today, why is this command producing different
> > permissions? Moreover how do I get it to produce sane results?
>
> I was able to use these command to produce sane results
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 4:46 PM, Andrey Repin wrote:
> Cygwin is not Linux.
> And C:\ drive is not a part of Cygwin.
> If you really want to destroy your Windows installation, there's easier ways
> than meddling with setfacl on the root drive.
Thanks for the reply. However, did you have anything co
Greetings, Steven Penny!
>> I upgraded to the new Cygwin today, why is this command producing different
>> permissions? Moreover how do I get it to produce sane results?
> I was able to use these command to produce sane results
> $ cd /cygdrive/c
> $ touch bad.txt
> $ setfacl -k .
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 5:17 AM, Steven Penny wrote:
> I upgraded to the new Cygwin today, why is this command producing different
> permissions? Moreover how do I get it to produce sane results?
I was able to use these command to produce sane results
$ cd /cygdrive/c
$ touch bad.txt
On 8. 4. 2015 12:17, Steven Penny wrote:
> Also I discovered this
>
> $ setfacl -b /cygdrive/c
>
> After that you get this
>
> C:\ is not accessible.
> Access is denied.
>
> Luckily this was in a virtual machine. Otherwise, can this be undone? This is
> very dangerous, and I feel it
5 matches
Mail list logo