RE: script command

2004-06-15 Thread Warren, Matthew \(Retail\)
This list can be very amusing. Surely this is off-topic? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Dessent Sent: Friday, June 11, 2004 9:43 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: script command Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote: > > The poi

Re: script command

2004-06-14 Thread Dr. Volker Zell
> Mike Kenny writes: > Brian, > thanks for this link. This is, almost, exactly what I was looking for. But, my compile > fails as it can't (neither can I) find libutil.h. Could you point me to a similar link for > this, or e-mail a copy directly to me? Just uncomment it, i

RE: script command

2004-06-14 Thread Mike Kenny - BCX - Infrastructure Services
; To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: script command > > > Mike Kenny - BCX - Infrastructure Services wrote: > > > -Original Message- > > From: Brian Dessent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Umm, PCYMTNQREAIYR. Thanks. > > (http://www.cygwin.com/acron

Re: script command

2004-06-14 Thread Brian Dessent
Mike Kenny - BCX - Infrastructure Services wrote: > -Original Message- > From: Brian Dessent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Umm, PCYMTNQREAIYR. Thanks. (http://www.cygwin.com/acronyms/#PCYMTNQREAIYR) > > "Warren, Matthew (Retail)" wrote: > > > > > Does cygwin provide support the script comm

RE: script command

2004-06-14 Thread Mike Kenny - BCX - Infrastructure Services
ian Dessent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, June 11, 2004 2:21 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: script command > > > "Warren, Matthew (Retail)" wrote: > > > I thought this was it, or am I missing something? > > The point was that your o

OT: signatures (RE: script command)

2004-06-12 Thread John Morrison
> From: Brian Dessent > > What ever happened to the internet where netiquette actually meant > anything? You know, that whole thing about keeping signatures to less > than 4 lines x 72 chars, not quoting entire messages, not sending HTML > email to public lists, and so on? Unfortunately I have a

Re: script command

2004-06-11 Thread Brian Dessent
Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote: > > The point was that your original message had 1 line of signal > > and 29 lines of noise. > > Um, the original email had a different person's name, different email > address, and different company disclaimer. The only similarities are > that it's in the same threa

Re: script command

2004-06-11 Thread Joshua Daniel Franklin
> The point was that your original message had 1 line of signal > and 29 lines of noise. Um, the original email had a different person's name, different email address, and different company disclaimer. The only similarities are that it's in the same thread and has a long disclaimer. A recent arti

Re: script command

2004-06-11 Thread Brian Dessent
"Warren, Matthew (Retail)" wrote: > I thought this was it, or am I missing something? The point was that your original message had 1 line of signal and 29 lines of noise. > Does cygwin provide support the script command? No, it does not in the net release. However, see for example: http://marc

RE: script command

2004-06-11 Thread Warren, Matthew (Retail)
I thought this was it, or am I missing something? Does cygwin provide support the script command? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Dessent Sent: Friday, June 11, 2004 4:27 AM Cc: 'Cygwin (E-mail)' Subject: Re: script com

Re: script command

2004-06-10 Thread Brian Dessent
Dave Korn wrote: > Sorry, but in accordance with your disclaimer I have deleted your mail as > reading it would probably constitute an "unauthorised use" on my part. There was a question in there? I thought he was posting his resume to the list... Brian -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwi

RE: script command

2004-06-10 Thread Dave Korn
> -Original Message- > From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Mike Kenny - BCX - Infrastructure Services > Sent: 10 June 2004 09:31 > To: Cygwin (E-mail) > Subject: script command Sorry, but in accordance with your disclaimer I have deleted your mail as reading it would probably constitute an