Re: question on gdb

2010-01-24 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 07:42:32AM +, Marco Atzeri wrote: >Hi, >recently, after some change in the source, the octave >development branch started to SIGSEV on exit. >The strange issue is that this happen only >for cygwin and not on the other platforms. >I have not yet found a solution, only a

Re: question on gdb

2010-01-24 Thread Dave Korn
On 24/01/2010 07:42, Marco Atzeri wrote: > My question however is about the gdb backtrace, is the > "Cannot access memory at address 0x1a" at # 9 normal ? I wouldn't read too much into it. Could indicate that there's some kind of corruption at the top end of the stack, or it could just be gdb

Re: Question on gdb and ?? And also Frame did not save PC message

2008-04-08 Thread Brian Dessent
Brian Keener wrote: > As to the second part of my question - is there a way to determine what > sources/debug info I still need to get around the ?? Or is that just a > matter of tracing from the sources I can see to find what it is bing > called next? Most of those frames with ?? are totally bog

Re: Question on gdb and ?? And also Frame did not save PC message

2008-04-08 Thread Brian Keener
Brian Dessent wrote: > thinking that somehow there's a segmentation fault in pthreads code when > there isn't. If you're going to enable the option then you need to > "continue" past those non-faults. Brian, Thanks for clarifying that. I was doing that for two reasons - the first is because I

Re: Question on gdb and ?? And also Frame did not save PC message

2008-04-08 Thread Brian Dessent
Brian Keener wrote: > (gdb) set cygwin-exceptions on > (gdb) run > ... > Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. > 0x610d5de9 in pthread_mutexattr_init (attr=0x23cb50) > at /usr/develop/src/src/src/winsup/cygwin/thread.cc:123 > 123 if ((*object)->magic != magic) > (gdb) thre