Re: process memory limit

2002-01-07 Thread David Starks-Browning
On Saturday 5 Jan 02, Christopher Faylor writes: > >it appears that a cygwin app can't alloc more than around 256MB, > >even though: > > > >o my machine has 2GB of physical mem and plenty of virtual > >o the same app compiled with the Intel or MS compiler can > > allocate much more > > > >after d

Re: process memory limit

2002-01-06 Thread Robert Collins
- Original Message - From: "John A. Turner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, January 06, 2002 10:33 AM Subject: process memory limit > [member of the "Valiantly Trying to Ask Intelligently" club...] > > I've been investigating an apparent limitation on process me

Re: process memory limit

2002-01-05 Thread John A. Turner
Christopher Faylor wrote: > >after digging through the mail archives and docs, I've checked > >out the sources in hopes of finding a parameter that could be > >increased > > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2001-04/msg00141.html damn... I sure wish I had found that - would have saved me hour

Re: process memory limit

2002-01-05 Thread Randall R Schulz
John, On April third on this mailing list there was a discussion of the "heap_chunk_in_mb" registry setting that controls the limit you're experiencing. Read those messages or search for "heap_chunk_in_mb" on Google: . Randall Schulz Mountain V

Re: process memory limit

2002-01-05 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Sat, Jan 05, 2002 at 04:33:36PM -0700, John A. Turner wrote: >[member of the "Valiantly Trying to Ask Intelligently" club...] > >I've been investigating an apparent limitation on process memory, >and I've gone about as far as I can without asking for some advice. > >Brief Summary >-