> I'm having a problem with chroot - see the following strace:
> At the start of the strace chroot (".") has been called; it
> succeeds at time
> 63935. (The same problem occurs with chroot( rootfs>) as well).
> Then chdir ("/") is called at time 64000. The result of conv_to_posix_path
> at time 2
Chris,
When an exec(2) system call fails do to a file format problem (ENOEXEC) as
opposed to a file-not-found error (ENOENT) or a permission error (EPERM),
the fallback action taken by the shell is to interpret the file as a script.
One could argue that the shell should be a little more intell
> > > I'm having a problem with chroot - see the following strace:
> >
> > <--snip-->
> >
> > > At the start of the strace chroot (".") has been called; it
> > succeeds
> > > at time 63935. (The same problem occurs with chroot( > > rootfs>) as well).
> > > Then chdir ("/") is called at time 64000.
ber 01, 2002 5:08 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: problem with chroot causing Cygwin to get
> confused about the root directory
>
>
> > I'm having a problem with chroot - see the following strace:
>
> <--snip-->
>
> > At the start of th
oblem with chroot causing Cygwin to get
> confused about the root directory
>
>
> > I'm having a problem with chroot - see the following strace:
>
> <--snip-->
>
> > At the start of the strace chroot (".") has been called; it
> succee
> I'm having a problem with chroot - see the following strace:
<--snip-->
> At the start of the strace chroot (".") has been called; it
> succeeds at time
> 63935. (The same problem occurs with chroot( rootfs>) as well).
> Then chdir ("/") is called at time 64000. The result of conv_to_posix_path
6 matches
Mail list logo
