Re: pow math function pb.

2003-11-27 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 04:55:51PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > printf("\n\n%f\n", pow(2.0,8.0)); Did you mean %lf as in your test program? Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developermailto:[EMAIL PR

RE: pow math function pb.

2003-11-27 Thread zze-BDE balg011 VAUCHER Laurent DvSI/SIReS/GRE
> Sorry, I forgot to say that I'm using the latest cygwin. > gcc version is 3.3.1. > I have tried again the little example and now it works. > But my main program which ends by these two lines. > I have cleaned my program and I attach it to this mail. But in your main program, you don't include ma

Re: pow math function pb.

2003-11-27 Thread ycollet
Hello, Sorry, I forgot to say that I'm using the latest cygwin. gcc version is 3.3.1. I have tried again the little example and now it works. But my main program which ends by these two lines. I have cleaned my program and I attach it to this mail. Your sincerely, Yann COLLETTE > On Thu, Nov 27,

RE: pow math function pb.

2003-11-27 Thread Hughes, Bill
Sent: 27 November 2003 15:29 From: Christopher Faylor > On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 04:06:30PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >Works for me with Cygwin 1.5.5 and recent developer snapshots. You > >didn't tell anything about the version you're using. > > And that's one of the reasons why we don't ha

Re: pow math function pb.

2003-11-27 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 04:06:30PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 03:39:51PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I've tried this program under cygwin: >> >> #include >> >> int main() >> { >> printf("%lf\n", pow(2,8)); >> return 0; >> } >> >> This progra

Re: pow math function pb.

2003-11-27 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 03:39:51PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hello, > > I've tried this program under cygwin: > > #include > > int main() > { > printf("%lf\n", pow(2,8)); > return 0; > } > > This program returns 8 instead of 256. > I've tried pow(2.0,8), pow(2.0, 8.0), etc ... Seem