[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 07:32:16AM -0500, Norman Vine wrote:
Any 'tips' as to how to best debug this appreciated
- Attach to the hung process with gdb and see where it is hung.
- Provide cygcheck output.
- Run under strace and see if you can
Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 07:32:16AM -0500, Norman Vine wrote:
> >
> >With a Cygwin CVS tree I built this AM < (2) below >
> >rxvt has problems when configuring a project from a build directory
> >
> >ie
> >$TOP_DIR
> > src
> > build
> >
> >cd $TOP_DIR/build
> >
On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 07:32:16AM -0500, Norman Vine wrote:
>Christopher Faylor writes:
>
>> In the most recent cygwin snapshot (uploading now) I've attempted to
>> work around the 10ms delay in pipe reads.
>
>< snip >
>
>> Please check out the latest snapshot and report here if there are
>> prob
I have similar experience. Examining the processes when the ./configure
hangs reveals that hanging leaf seems to be always 'sed', running as a
part of config.status script creating Makefiles etc.
I'm running XPPro, the same results were achieved when running configure
inside xterm or inside FSF
Christopher Faylor writes:
> In the most recent cygwin snapshot (uploading now) I've attempted to
> work around the 10ms delay in pipe reads.
< snip >
> Please check out the latest snapshot and report here if there are
> problems. I haven't yet tried this on Windows 9x class systems so it's
>
Sorry I forgot to metion I'm using windows 2000 pro/adv. server and
windows xp home/pro.
Elfyn
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Elfyn McBratney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I've also been using kde (Kmail), gzip with piped input, cat, less and also a few
>other tailor made apps with no problems. If anything
I've also been using kde (Kmail), gzip with piped input, cat, less and also a few
other tailor made apps with no problems. If anything it's a bit faster ;)
Elfyn
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- "Ralf Habacker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Please check out the latest snapshot and report here if there are
> Please check out the latest snapshot and report here if there are
> problems. I haven't yet tried this on Windows 9x class systems so it's
> entirely possible that there is a problem there.
>
I've used this snapshot for running kde (Kmail,konqueror and other) a while on
windows 2000 and haven't
> W98/SE. With the current cygwin1.dll I tried
> time cat | nice -0 dd of=/dev/null
> time cat | nice --1 dd of=/dev/null
> where hugefile ~ 100MB, and got times roughly 1m20s with the 2nd instruction
> marginally faster. Then switched to the snapshot cygwin1-20021210.dll and
> shaved a m
W98/SE. With the current cygwin1.dll I tried
time cat | nice -0 dd of=/dev/null
time cat | nice --1 dd of=/dev/null
where hugefile ~ 100MB, and got times roughly 1m20s with the 2nd instruction
marginally faster. Then switched to the snapshot cygwin1-20021210.dll and
shaved a minute yes a
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 02:26:39PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 03:08:45PM +0100, thomas wrote:
>>Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Please check out the latest snapshot and report here if there are
>>> problems. I haven't yet tried this on Windows 9x
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 03:08:45PM +0100, thomas wrote:
>Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Please check out the latest snapshot and report here if there are
>> problems. I haven't yet tried this on Windows 9x class systems so it's
>> entirely possible that there is a problem there
Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please check out the latest snapshot and report here if there are
> problems. I haven't yet tried this on Windows 9x class systems so it's
> entirely possible that there is a problem there.
It seems to work great! I did a few tests and there was no
13 matches
Mail list logo
