Re: Ping crashes

On Oct 29 23:59, Andrey Repin wrote: > Greetings, Corinna Vinschen! > > > I just pushed a patch supposed to fix this issue. The bug is actually > > worse and potentially affects more than just ping. Every time a socket, > > socketpair, or accept call fails for some reason, there's a potential >

Re: Ping crashes

On Oct 29 17:39, Houder wrote: > On Mon, 29 Oct 2018 16:40:43, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > > > On Oct 27 15:25, Lavrentiev, Anton (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C] via cygwin wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > I have a problem with the ping utility on Cygwin: it keeps crashing with = > > segmentation fault. I've

Re: Ping crashes

Greetings, Corinna Vinschen! > I just pushed a patch supposed to fix this issue. The bug is actually > worse and potentially affects more than just ping. Every time a socket, > socketpair, or accept call fails for some reason, there's a potential > SEGV. Oh, boy, oh boy. I wonder if that expla

Re: Ping crashes

On Mon, 29 Oct 2018 16:40:43, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > On Oct 27 15:25, Lavrentiev, Anton (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C] via cygwin wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I have a problem with the ping utility on Cygwin: it keeps crashing with = > segmentation fault. I've checked that all my packages (including Cygwi

Re: Ping crashes

On Oct 27 15:25, Lavrentiev, Anton (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C] via cygwin wrote: > Hello, > > I have a problem with the ping utility on Cygwin: it keeps crashing with > segmentation fault. I've checked that all my packages (including Cygwin core) > are up to date. What am I missing? At any rate, I gues

Re: Ping crashes

Hello, Anton. I'm a maintainer of ping package. Thank you for your report. Ping requires administrator privilege in windows OSs older than Windows 10 build 14926. In such OSs, ping should result in error: 'ping: Lacking privilege for raw socket.' However, with cygwin 2.11.0 or later, it seems th

Re: Ping crashes

On Sat, 27 Oct 2018 15:25:50, X wrote: > Hello, > > I have a problem with the ping utility on Cygwin: it keeps crashing with se= > gmentation fault. I've checked that all my packages (including Cygwin core) [snip] > $ ping 192.168.1.1 > Segmentation fault (core dumped) Related? https:/

Re: Ping crashes

On Sat, 27 Oct 2018 15:25:50, X wrote: > Hello, > > I have a problem with the ping utility on Cygwin: it keeps crashing with se= > gmentation fault. I've checked that all my packages (including Cygwin core) [snip] > $ ping 192.168.1.1 > Segmentation fault (core dumped) Confirmed ... That is

Re: ping "Operation not permitted" on Windows 7

On 6/25/2010 3:07 AM, David Arnstein wrote: Using Windows 7 Professional, cygwin, mintty,and bash. All are up to date. I am getting this: $ type ping ping is hashed (/usr/bin/ping) $ ping www.microsoft.com ping: socket: Operation not permitted If I launch mintty "Run as admin

Re: ping "Operation not permitted" on Windows 7

> From: David Arnstein > To: cygwin@cygwin.com > Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 03:07:54 -0400 > Subject: ping "Operation not permitted" on Windows 7 > Using Windows 7 Professional, cygwin, mintty,and bash. All are up to date. > I am getting this: >$ type ping >ping is hashed (/usr/bin/ping) >

Re: PING: Deprecation of -mno-cygwin.

Eric Backus wrote: > Christopher Faylor cygwin.com> writes: >>> which would put all the confusion to rest. >> Big DITTO. As Dave said, the option is already gone... > > Moving to a better solution is great! But isn't it customary to have some > overlap period where the deprecated solution sti

Re: PING: Deprecation of -mno-cygwin.

Christopher Faylor cygwin.com> writes: > On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 02:22:03PM +, Greg Chicares wrote: > >On 2009-03-23 14:00Z, Steve Thompson wrote: > >> On Mon, 23 Mar 2009, Dave Korn wrote: > >> > >>> It's a bit of a kludge compared to having a real honest-to-god > >>> cross-compiler. It's

Re: PING: Deprecation of -mno-cygwin.

Steve Thompson wrote: > On Mon, 23 Mar 2009, Dave Korn wrote: > >> It's a bit of a kludge compared to having a real honest-to-god >> cross-compiler. It's never worked entirely right in terms of keeping >> cygwin and mingw headers and libs completely separate. A full-blown mingw >> cross-compiler

Re: PING: Deprecation of -mno-cygwin.

On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 02:22:03PM +, Greg Chicares wrote: >On 2009-03-23 14:00Z, Steve Thompson wrote: >> On Mon, 23 Mar 2009, Dave Korn wrote: >> >>> It's a bit of a kludge compared to having a real honest-to-god >>> cross-compiler. It's never worked entirely right in terms of keeping cygw

Re: PING: Deprecation of -mno-cygwin.

On 2009-03-23 14:00Z, Steve Thompson wrote: > On Mon, 23 Mar 2009, Dave Korn wrote: > >> It's a bit of a kludge compared to having a real honest-to-god >> cross-compiler. It's never worked entirely right in terms of keeping cygwin >> and mingw headers and libs completely separate. A full-blown

Re: PING: Deprecation of -mno-cygwin.

On Mon, 23 Mar 2009, Dave Korn wrote: It's a bit of a kludge compared to having a real honest-to-god cross-compiler. It's never worked entirely right in terms of keeping cygwin and mingw headers and libs completely separate. A full-blown mingw cross-compiler won't cost that much in terms of d

Re: PING: Deprecation of -mno-cygwin.

Steve Thompson wrote: > uOn Mon, 23 Mar 2009, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: > >> Please, NO! -mno-cygwin needs to go away already. > > Why? > It's a bit of a kludge compared to having a real honest-to-god cross-compiler. It's never worked entirely right in terms of keeping cygwin and mingw heade

Re: PING: Deprecation of -mno-cygwin.

Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Corinna Vinschen wrote: >> It might be helpful for a transition period to retain both options. >> >> $ i686-pc-cygwin-gcc -mcygwin <- just works >> $ i686-pc-cygwin-gcc -mno-cygwin <- Spits out a wa

Re: PING: Deprecation of -mno-cygwin.

uOn Mon, 23 Mar 2009, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: Please, NO! -mno-cygwin needs to go away already. Why? -Steve -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ:

Re: PING: Deprecation of -mno-cygwin.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Corinna Vinschen wrote: > It might be helpful for a transition period to retain both options. > > $ i686-pc-cygwin-gcc -mcygwin <- just works > $ i686-pc-cygwin-gcc -mno-cygwin<- Spits out a warning Please, NO! -mno-cygwin ne

Re: PING: Deprecation of -mno-cygwin.

On Mar 23 00:42, Dave Korn wrote: > > > Ho there gang. Over on gcc-patches, Kai has posted a patch to add some > documentation for the i386 cygming subtarget options. See the thread at: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-03/threads.html#00994 > > I asked him if he would add a

Re: Ping failure under Vista 64 SP1 rc1

> Corinna wrote: > >On Dec 14 21:02, Ian Puleston wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm running Vista 64 with Cygwin and, now that they finally have 64-bit >> support for it, MinGW msys. I just installed the new Vista SP1 rc1, and now >> Cygwin ping does not work: > >MingW ping?!? I didn't know a MingW ping ex

Re: Ping failure under Vista 64 SP1 rc1

On Dec 14 21:02, Ian Puleston wrote: > Hi, > > I'm running Vista 64 with Cygwin and, now that they finally have 64-bit > support for it, MinGW msys. I just installed the new Vista SP1 rc1, and now > Cygwin ping does not work: > > [~]: ping 10.0.77.1 > ping: socket: Operation not permitted > [~]:

Re: ping Unison users: abandon versions 2.9.1-2.12.0 ?

> I use 2.10.2, but so long as you can provide something like 2.27.29 in > its place I could move ahead and match my server. OK, understood. I'll have a unison2.27 package out tomorrow. It will be version 2.27.29 for right now, but all versions 2.27.x can sync with each other. -- Unsubscribe i

Re: ping Unison users: abandon versions 2.9.1-2.12.0 ?

Andrew Schulman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Is anyone still using any of the unison2.9.1, unison2.9.20, > unison2.10.2, or unison2.12.0 packages in Cygwin? I use 2.10.2, but so long as you can provide something like 2.27.29 in its place I could move ahead and match my server. -- Steven E. Har

Re: ping Unison users: abandon versions 2.9.1-2.12.0 ?

> I am _not_ the maintainer I'm the Cygwin maintainer for Unison. > but 2.9.1 is the only version I have that > will talk to a current development machine -- a current debian machine too. My Debian host has $ apt-cache policy unison unison: Installed: 2.13.16-6 Candidate: 2.13.16-6 Versi

RE: ping Unison users: abandon versions 2.9.1-2.12.0 ?

On 03 July 2007 18:15, morgan gangwere wrote: > I am _not_ the maintainer Well, duh. You know the person who you're replying to? You know, the person who is asking whether he should carry on maintaining so many versions? He'd be the maintainer. Are you /quite/ sure you're actually awake

Re: ping Unison users: abandon versions 2.9.1-2.12.0 ?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Andrew Schulman wrote: > Unison users on Cygwin: > > I'm preparing a new unison2.27 package, to be released shortly. As I do > that, I'm looking over the old Unison packages in Cygwin: > > unison2.9.1 > unison2.9.20 > unison2.10.2 > unison2.12.0 > un

Re: [Ping Python maintainer]: enhancement request

* Thorsten Kampe (Tue, 1 May 2007 20:49:59 +0100) > * Brian Dessent (Tue, 01 May 2007 12:25:15 -0700) > > Thorsten Kampe wrote: > > > What about this "winsymlinks" Cygwin environment variable? The > > > description says "if set, Cygwin creates symlinks as Windows shortcuts > > > with a special head

Re: [Ping Python maintainer]: enhancement request

* Brian Dessent (Tue, 01 May 2007 12:25:15 -0700) > Thorsten Kampe wrote: > > What about this "winsymlinks" Cygwin environment variable? The > > description says "if set, Cygwin creates symlinks as Windows shortcuts > > with a special header and the R/O attribute set. If not set, Cygwin > > creates

Re: [Ping Python maintainer]: enhancement request

Thorsten Kampe wrote: > What about this "winsymlinks" Cygwin environment variable? The > description says "if set, Cygwin creates symlinks as Windows shortcuts > with a special header and the R/O attribute set. If not set, Cygwin > creates symlinks as plain files with a magic number, a path and th

Re: [Ping Python maintainer]: enhancement request

* Jason Tishler (Tue, 01 May 2007 14:32:06 -0400) > On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 10:21:25AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: > > OTOH, I still don't see any reason not to tell people "you have to run > > bash first if you want to use python". > > This is the solution that I prefer. I think the best so

Re: [Ping Python maintainer]: enhancement request

On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 10:21:25AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: > OTOH, I still don't see any reason not to tell people "you have to run > bash first if you want to use python". This is the solution that I prefer. > I believe that the vast majority of people who use Cygwin always > invoke cli

Re: [Ping Python maintainer]: enhancement request

On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 03:30:59PM +0100, Thorsten Kampe wrote: >* Christopher Faylor (Tue, 1 May 2007 10:22:58 -0400) >>On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 02:59:20PM +0100, Thorsten Kampe wrote: >>>* Eric Blake (Tue, 01 May 2007 07:27:49 -0600) According to Thorsten Kampe on 5/1/2007 7:11 AM: >Both t

RE: [Ping Python maintainer]: enhancement request

On 01 May 2007 15:33, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 03:15:52PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote: >> On 01 May 2007 14:59, Charles Wilson wrote: >>> Because python is a command interpreter, > >>> Similarly, sh.exe >> >> I think these are two very strong arguments in favour. > > pytho

Re: [Ping Python maintainer]: enhancement request

Christopher Faylor wrote: On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 03:15:52PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote: On 01 May 2007 14:59, Charles Wilson wrote: Because python is a command interpreter, Similarly, sh.exe I think these are two very strong arguments in favour. python.exe isn't anything like the interactive

Re: [Ping Python maintainer]: enhancement request

* Christopher Faylor (Tue, 1 May 2007 10:22:58 -0400) > On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 02:59:20PM +0100, Thorsten Kampe wrote: > >* Eric Blake (Tue, 01 May 2007 07:27:49 -0600) > >>According to Thorsten Kampe on 5/1/2007 7:11 AM: > >>>Both things are actually the same under Cygwin (tested on my FAT32 > >>

Re: [Ping Python maintainer]: enhancement request

On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 03:15:52PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote: >On 01 May 2007 14:59, Charles Wilson wrote: >>Because python is a command interpreter, >>Similarly, sh.exe > >I think these are two very strong arguments in favour. python.exe isn't anything like the interactive shell that people use on

Re: [Ping Python maintainer]: enhancement request

On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 02:59:20PM +0100, Thorsten Kampe wrote: >* Eric Blake (Tue, 01 May 2007 07:27:49 -0600) >>According to Thorsten Kampe on 5/1/2007 7:11 AM: >>>Both things are actually the same under Cygwin (tested on my FAT32 >>>flash drive and under Windows XP NTFS). >> >>True only for FAT

Re: [Ping Python maintainer]: enhancement request

On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 09:59:24AM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote: >Christopher Faylor wrote: >>Before you do this, I have a question. Why is this important now when >>you've >>apparently been doing this for many years? This isn't the only package >>which >>makes symlinks to executables. And, sin

RE: [Ping Python maintainer]: enhancement request

On 01 May 2007 14:59, Charles Wilson wrote: > Because python is a command interpreter, > Similarly, sh.exe I think these are two very strong arguments in favour. I note that we already (appear to?) do the same for perl. (/me remembers back to the insane gyrations I had to go through a c

Re: [Ping Python maintainer]: enhancement request

* Eric Blake (Tue, 01 May 2007 07:27:49 -0600) > According to Thorsten Kampe on 5/1/2007 7:11 AM: > > Both things are actually the same under Cygwin (tested on my FAT32 > > flash drive and under Windows XP NTFS). > > True only for FAT and FAT32, which don't support hard links at all. > > > NTFS

Re: [Ping Python maintainer]: enhancement request

Christopher Faylor wrote: Before you do this, I have a question. Why is this important now when you've apparently been doing this for many years? This isn't the only package which makes symlinks to executables. And, since, AFAIK, setup.exe doesn't understand hard links it means that you really

Re: [Ping Python maintainer]: enhancement request

On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 09:50:31AM -0400, Lev Bishop wrote: >On 5/1/07, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 08:06:23AM -0400, Jason Tishler wrote: >>>OK. Should I copy or make a hard link? >> >>Before you do this, I have a question. Why is this important now when >>you've apparen

Re: [Ping Python maintainer]: enhancement request

On 5/1/07, Christopher Faylor wrote: On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 08:06:23AM -0400, Jason Tishler wrote: >OK. Should I copy or make a hard link? Before you do this, I have a question. Why is this important now when you've apparently been doing this for many years? This isn't the only package whic

Re: [Ping Python maintainer]: enhancement request

On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 08:06:23AM -0400, Jason Tishler wrote: >On Sun, Apr 29, 2007 at 11:58:57PM +0100, Thorsten Kampe wrote: >> I just found out that in the standard Cygwin Python setup it is not >> possible to run the Python interpreter from a Win32 command shell. >> (You get an error about t

Re: [Ping Python maintainer]: enhancement request

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Thorsten Kampe on 5/1/2007 7:11 AM: > Both things are actually the same under Cygwin (tested on my FAT32 > flash drive and under Windows XP NTFS). True only for FAT and FAT32, which don't support hard links at all. > NTFS supports hard

Re: [Ping Python maintainer]: enhancement request

* Jason Tishler (Tue, 01 May 2007 08:06:23 -0400) > On Sun, Apr 29, 2007 at 11:58:57PM +0100, Thorsten Kampe wrote: > > I just found out that in the standard Cygwin Python setup it is not > > possible to run the Python interpreter from a Win32 command shell. > > (You get an error about the NTVDM

Re: [Ping Python maintainer]: enhancement request

On Sun, Apr 29, 2007 at 11:58:57PM +0100, Thorsten Kampe wrote: > I just found out that in the standard Cygwin Python setup it is not > possible to run the Python interpreter from a Win32 command shell. > (You get an error about the NTVDM (NT Virtual DOS machine even when C: > \cygwin\bin is in t

Re: [Ping Python maintainer]: enhancement request

* Thorsten Kampe (Sun, 29 Apr 2007 23:58:57 +0100) > As the Python interpreter itself is only about 43 Kb in size I > suggest copying the interpreter [...] which resolves the issue... Thorsten -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwi

Re: [ping] SWIG maintainer

Yep. The "const char *" declarations are missing with the current swig version so Python 2.5 doesn't work without modifications. It would be great to update SWIG now that Python is. Brian Hassink wrote: A friendly ping to the SWIG package maintainer... The current package is based on SWIG 1.

Re: PING ntsec [was RE: Can't start cron daemon in Cygwin 1.5.23 under WinXP SP2]

On Jan 26 12:00, Dave Korn wrote: > On 26 January 2007 09:34, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > > > once in a while? It's outdated (Dave?) > > Hi, haven't forgotten but got a bit overloaded. I'll try and finish a first > draft this weekend. Cool, thanks! Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen

Re: [PING boost maintainer] RE: boost 1.33.1-2 filesystem issue (was RE: Fatal Error w/ cygwin 1-5-23-*)

Dave Korn wrote: > On 01 January 2007 17:49, Dave Korn wrote: > > >> I'm going to try rebuilding the boost package JFTHOI, but I don't expect >> it to make any difference. > > > Well, I've done that, and somewhat to my surprise it does fix the problem, > so I can confirm to the maintainer

Re: ping: recvfrom: Invalid argument (cygwin-1.5.21 on Win XP SP2)

On Oct 20 14:42, Siegmar Gross wrote: > Hi, > > "ping" doesn't work for a normal user. Although this problem was reported > several times, I couldn't find a solution. Therefore I try once more with > additional information (at least I haven't seen some of my info in the > other mails). > > When I

RE: Ping Source Problem

On 20 September 2006 13:14, Stephen Grant Brown wrote: > I have downloaded the source for ping but when I go to compile it I get the > following output. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/src > $ ./ping-1.0-1.sh all > ./ping-1.0-1.sh: line 325: syntax error near unexpected token `&&' > ./ping-1.0-1.sh: l

Re: ping ignores ^C when host is not responding

On Jul 12 14:26, burning shadow wrote: > I cannot interrupt ping when host is not responding. I have to kill it > from another session. If host is responding, I can interrupt ping with > ^C. Look: This will work again in the next Cygwin version. In the meantime: - Just live with it, - Use Window

Re: Ping does not receive CTRL-C

On Wed, 31 May 2006, Igor Peshansky wrote: >On Wed, 31 May 2006, Rodrigo Medina wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I have found that, when a server does no respond, the ping program >> is not interrupted by CTRL-C or CTRL-Z. In order to stop ping, one >> has to open a new bash window and kill the ping process

Re: Ping does not receive CTRL-C

On Wed, 31 May 2006, Rodrigo Medina wrote: > Hi, > > I have found that, when a server does no respond, the ping program > is not interrupted by CTRL-C or CTRL-Z. In order to stop ping, one > has to open a new bash window and kill the ping process from there. > > $ ping mail.ivic.ve > PING mail.iv

Re: PING binutils maintainer (was: Re: Can we get a new release of binutils?)

On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 01:20:09PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 10:00:52AM -0800, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote: > >On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 09:17:37AM -0800, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote: > >>Can we get a new release of binutils? > > Nope. > > cgf OK. -- Unsubscri

Re: PING binutils maintainer (was: Re: Can we get a new release of binutils?)

On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 10:00:52AM -0800, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote: >On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 09:17:37AM -0800, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote: >>Can we get a new release of binutils? Nope. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cy

Re: ping

Ivan wrote: > Many thanks; cross-building from another directory did in fact > eliminate my problem. Anybody want a report saying that cross-build is > required on Cygwin but not on any (of several) other systems? I admit > the bell is more interesting :-) It is usual way to build any package o

Re: ping

On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 07:04:57PM -0800, Ivan Godard wrote: >Many thanks; cross-building from another directory did in fact >eliminate my problem. Anybody want a report saying that cross-build is >required on Cygwin but not on any (of several) other systems? I admit >the bell is more interesting

Re: ping

Ivan Godard wrote: Many thanks; cross-building from another directory did in fact eliminate my problem. Anybody want a report saying that cross-build is required on Cygwin but not on any (of several) other systems? Why not? I agree that not requiring cross-builds outside of the src director

Re: Ping

On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 05:00:12PM -0800, Ivan Godard wrote: >Thank you! Both the binutils from the distribution (as downloaded using >your standard tool) and the binutils direct from the gnu web site fail >in exactly the same way. I need to compile from source because we are >modifying that sou

Re: Ping

Thank you! Both the binutils from the distribution (as downloaded using your standard tool) and the binutils direct from the gnu web site fail in exactly the same way. I need to compile from source because we are modifying that source to cross-target a new processor. The UNmodified sources comp

Re: Ping

On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 04:43:25PM -0800, Ivan Godard wrote: >I have posted twice to this list in the last few days about being unable >to build binutils from source. In both cases the list reported my own >posting back to me (no bounce message). However, there has been neither >response to comm

Re: Ping autoconf maintainer (was Re: auto tools issues)

Brian Ford wrote: On Fri, 8 Jul 2005, Charles Wilson wrote: Short version: you're running the wrong aclocal. The automake tools no longer try to figure out which version of themselves to use; you need to tell them. Telling them used to be as easy as AC_REQUIRE(2.13) :-(. When it worked. W

Re: Ping autoconf maintainer (was Re: auto tools issues)

Thanks for the reply, Charles. On Fri, 8 Jul 2005, Charles Wilson wrote: > Brian Ford wrote: > >>$ aclocal > >>[snip underquoted macro definition warnings] > >>ac-wrapper: /usr/bin/autom4te-2.13 is missing or not executable. > >>Something is very wrong. > >>aclocal: autom4te failed wit

Re: Ping autoconf maintainer (was Re: auto tools issues)

Brian Ford wrote: $ aclocal [snip underquoted macro definition warnings] ac-wrapper: /usr/bin/autom4te-2.13 is missing or not executable. Something is very wrong. aclocal: autom4te failed with exit status: 1 Any ideas? Thanks. BTW, according to the http://cygwin.com/packages sear

Re: [Ping CKOA] Re: rebase-2.3-1 package

On Tue, 7 Jun 2005, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 02:30:02PM +0800, Carlo Florendo wrote: > >Jason Tishler wrote: > >>Please post instead of sending private email. > > > >Hey, I've seen this mentioned many times. A quick google with "Cygwin, > >Please post instead of sending

Re: [Ping CKOA] Re: rebase-2.3-1 package

On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 02:30:02PM +0800, Carlo Florendo wrote: >Jason Tishler wrote: >>Please post instead of sending private email. >> > >Hey, I've seen this mentioned many times. A quick google with "Cygwin, >Please post instead of sending private mail" would give around 200 hits > >Thus, with

Re: ping, nslookup can't resolve names

Rich McNeary wrote: I started trying to ping the other servers in cygwin's bash terminal but the host couldn't be found, nslookup had similar problems. I had a similar problem a few years ago. The problem was one of: - Windows not properly appending the domain name to a plain host name (i.e. a n

Re: ping, nslookup can't resolve names

On Thu, 31 Mar 2005, Rich McNeary wrote: > Hi, > > I feel like I should have been abe to find this, I've googled and > searched archives for 2 days, I see there are people who appear to > have a similar problem, but there's no resolution posted. > > I'm using Cygwin for jabber 1.4.3. Jabber compil

RE: ping command

At Friday, January 14, 2005 12:50 PM, Dr Jekyll wrote: > Hi, > I've installed full Cygwin but could not use "ping" command. Do you > have this problem, or do you know how to correct this error? > JK Search for ping.exe on http://sources.redhat.com/cygwin/packages/ and you will see that pin

Re: ping command

Dr Jekyll wrote: Hi, I've installed full Cygwin but could not use "ping" command. Do you have this problem, or do you know how to correct this error? JK Again, what was your first indication that it failed? Start here: http://cygwin.com/problems.html -- Happiness is merely the remission of pain. -

Re: Ping: Cygwin libtool / assembler problem with -DPIC

Yes, I know I'm annoying... configure already checks for needed gcc options: checking for gcc option to produce PIC... So why don't go with it and use the option which is issued here from configure? What are all the tests good for if finally libtool overrides it with its own flags? Gerrit --

Re: Ping: Cygwin libtool / assembler problem with -DPIC

Hi Charles, yet another contra: > You're missing the point. *libtool* doesn't know that -DPIC means > nothing for your code. On some platforms, you really have to compile > DIFFERENT CODE, not just compile the same code in a different way > (-fpic), when you want to make a pic object. Don't

Re: Ping: Cygwin libtool / assembler problem with -DPIC

Charles Wilson wrote: That's a gmp bug, not a libtool bug. And I don't think so. IMO all assembler code cannot be compiled on Cygwin when you use -DPIC to compile it. If libtool is used as it is now, the compilation will fail, so libntool should care about this and don't use this flag in case pla

Re: Ping: Cygwin libtool / assembler problem with -DPIC

Hi Charles, I just don't think it is good idea to use flags for s.th. else just because they are there anywhere. If there is need for anther special flag then introduce it, exactly for this reason and this platform and for nothing else. DLL_EXPORT is the best example, if there is really a need fo

Re: Ping: Cygwin libtool / assembler problem with -DPIC

Gerrit P. Haase wrote: I think it is a bad thing to add -D flags unconditionally and for sure it is a bad thing if it is a noop. You're missing the point. *libtool* doesn't know that -DPIC means nothing for your code. On some platforms, you really have to compile DIFFERENT CODE, not just compil

Re: Ping: Cygwin libtool / assembler problem with -DPIC

Hi Charles, > Libtool gives -DPIC -DDLL_EXPORT to indicate a cygwin or mingw DLL. We > undefine PIC since we don't need to be position independent in this > case and definitely don't want the ELF style _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ etc. > ifdef(`DLL_EXPORT',`undefine(`PIC')') > Now, on *mingw*, we do i

Re: Ping: Cygwin libtool / assembler problem with -DPIC

Gerrit P. Haase wrote: Noah Misch wrote: There was a thread about this general topic awhile ago. That GMP actively uses -DPIC to select the correct assembly came up: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool/2003-01/msg00060.html I saw that -DPIC was used on Cygwin to compile assembly and it co

Re: Ping: Cygwin libtool / assembler problem with -DPIC

Noah Misch wrote: On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 03:29:10PM +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: Gerrit wrote: PING! Hello, With GNU as PIC is not an noop, when -DPIC is used to invoke gas the generated assembly is broken. I saw this problem with a reautoconfiscated version of GMP. This may be unusual, but t

Re: Ping: Cygwin libtool / assembler problem with -DPIC

On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 03:29:10PM +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: > Gerrit wrote: > > PING! > > > Hello, > > > With GNU as PIC is not an noop, when -DPIC is used to invoke gas the > > generated assembly is broken. I saw this problem with a > > reautoconfiscated version of GMP. This may be unusu

Re: ping Corinna

On Tue, 8 Jul 2003, james lankton wrote: > Hello Elfyn, > no is the answer to your question, but I will today. > > What I would like to clear up is it not the case that > openssl 0.9.7b comes installed with cygwin if so > whats the point of running config and make? Erm, sorry..what do you mean?

Re: ping Corinna

Hello Elfyn, no is the answer to your question, but I will today. What I would like to clear up is it not the case that openssl 0.9.7b comes installed with cygwin if so whats the point of running config and make? James "james lankton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: ping Corinna

my fault again IDEA as in no-idea. my goodness I should really stop taking all those pills. james "Elfyn McBratney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Tue, 8 Jul 2003, james lankton wrote: > > > Hello Corinna, > > > > On the 31/6/2003 referring to ssl you wrote: > >

RE: ping Corinna

its an encryption algorithm, (International Data Encryption Algorithm) (a tiny bit about the idea algorithm.) -Original Message- > From: james lankton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 08 July 200

Re: ping Corinna

On Tue, 8 Jul 2003, james lankton wrote: > Hello Corinna, > > On the 31/6/2003 referring to ssl you wrote: > > >If you have a look into the util/cygwin.sh script, you'll find it makes > >basically this: > > > ./config --prefix=/usr shared no-idea no-rc5 no-mdc2 > >make depend > > make > Does

Re: ping Eduardo Chappa-pine

*** alex hardy ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote today: :) >Pine does not need to use ssmtp to send e-mail, that's a cygwin :) >program for mutt. When sending e-mail with Pine you need to define the :) >smtp-server variable. From the main screen press S C, it's almost at :) >the top. :) :) Here is what my

Re: Ping program?

Hopkins, Samuel wrote: I need the sourcecode to modify. =( If you *must* have a ping program that does something *special* then you might want to look at libpcap (www.tcpdump.org) and libnet (www.packetfactory.net) libraries then you should be able to implement whatever functionality you may

RE: Ping program?

The ping would always be launched with root (administrator) privileges on Windows 2000. -Original Message- From: Martin Gainty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 12:05 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Ping program? Igor makes a good point if you have any

Re: Ping program?

t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Hopkins, Samuel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 9:50 AM Subject: Re: Ping program? > On Mon, 31 Mar 2003, Hopkins, Samuel wrote: > > > I'm dying here. > > Sorry, can't hel

Re: Ping program?

On Mon, 31 Mar 2003, Hopkins, Samuel wrote: > I'm dying here. Sorry, can't help you with that... > Does anyone have a ping program that will compile under cygwin? I've > downloaded about 27 ping programs and none compile. > Thanks, > Sam IIRC, ping requires elevated privileges under WinNT/2k/XP

RE: Ping program?

I need the sourcecode to modify. =( -Original Message- From: Randall R Schulz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 11:42 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Ping program? Sam, You don't say which version of Windows you're running, but NT, 2000 and XP all

Re: Ping program?

Sam- There is ping source at the Birthplace of the HAL 9000 computer http://tecfa.unige.ch/guides/internet-tools-summary-decemj.html Do a find on ping / source Good Luck, Martin - Original Message - From: "Hopkins, Samuel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, March 31

Re: Ping program?

Sam, You don't say which version of Windows you're running, but NT, 2000 and XP all include a ping program. Is it insufficient for your needs? % type ping ping is /cygdrive/d/WINNT/system32/ping Randall Schulz At 08:24 2003-03-31, you wrote: I'm dying here. Does anyone have a ping program that

Re: ping on cygwin?

Tino Lange <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in gmane.os.cygwin on Mon, 13 Jan 2003 18:36:45 +0100: > Thanks! I read it once again and hence I like to (try to) contribute - > see below. > > I learned a lot about raw icmp sockets and why only root is allowed to > open them - maki

Re: ping on cygwin?

ain a Cygwin package. You can post questions you may have about your imminent package there. Thanks for your efforts so far! Larry Original Message: - From: Tino Lange [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 18:36:45 +0100 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: ping

Re: ping on cygwin?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi again! Again I have to direct you to the FAQ: Why isn't package available in Cygwin? (Or, why is your package so out of date?) Thanks! I read it once again and hence I like to (try to) contribute - see below. it's ver

  1   2   >